skip to main content
10.1145/1073970.1074018acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspaaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Traffic engineering of management flows by link augmentations on confluent trees

Published:18 July 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Service providers rely on the management systems housed in their Network Operations Centers (NOCs) to remotely operate, monitor and provision their data networks. Lately there has been a tremendous increase in management traffic due to the growing complexity and size of the data networks and the services provisioned on them. Traffic engineering for management flows is essential for the smooth functioning of these networks to avoid congestion, which can result in loss of critical data such as billing records, network alarms, etc. As is the case with most intra-domain routing protocols, the management flows in many of these networks are routed on shortest paths connecting the NOC with the service provider's POPs (points of presence). This collection of paths thus forms a "confluent" tree rooted at the gateway router connected to the NOC. The links close to the gateway router may form a bottleneck in this tree resulting in congestion. Typically this congestion is alleviated by adding layer two tunnels (virtual links) that offload the traffic from some links of this tree by routing it directly to the gateway router. The traffic engineering problem is then to minimize the number of virtual links needed for alleviating congestion. The traffic engineering problem described above also has applications to alleviating congestion resulting from focused overloads in VoIP networks and for dealing with congesting resulting from flash crowds in the world wide web.In this paper we formulate a traffic engineering problem motivated by the above mentioned applications. We show that the general versions of this problem are hard to solve. However, for some simpler cases in which the underlying network is a tree, we design efficient algorithms. We use these algorithms as the basis for designing efficient heuristics for alleviating congestion in general (non-tree) service provider network topologies.

References

  1. D. Applegate and E. Cohen. Making intra-domain routing robust to changing and uncertain traffic demands: Understanding fundamental tradeoffs. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Y. Bejerano and R. Rastogi. Robust monitoring of link delays and faults in IP networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Bienkowski, M. Korzeniowski, and H. Räcke. A practical algorithm for constructing oblivious routing schemes. In 15th Annual ACM symp. on Parallel algorithms and architectures (SPAA), pages 24--33, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Breitbart, C. Y. Chan, M. Garofalakis, R. Rastogi, and A. Silberschatz. Efficiently monitoring bandwidth and latency in ip networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Chen, R. Kleinberg, L. Lovasz, R. Rajaraman, R. Sundaram, and A. Vetta. (almost) tight bounds and existence theorems for confluent flows. In Symp. on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Chen, R. Rajaraman, and R. Sundaram. Meet and merge: approximation algorithms for confluent flow. In Symp. on Theory of Computing (STOC), pages 373--382, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Ford and D. Fulkerson. Flows in Network. Princeton University Press, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. B. Fortz, J. Rexford, and M. Thorup. Internet traffic engineering by optimizing OSPF weights. In IEEE INFOCOM, pages 118--124, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. B. Fortz, J. Rexford, and M. Thorup. Traffic engineering with traditional IP routing protocols. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(10):118--124, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Fortz and M. Thorup. Optimizing OSPF/IS-IS weights in a changing world. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 20(4):756--767, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Frank. Connectivity augmentation problems in network design. Mathematical Programming: state of the art, pages 34--63, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Iyer, S. Bhattacharrya, N. Taft, and C. Diot. An approach to alleviate link overload as observed on an IP backbone. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Jamin, C. Jin, Y. Jin, D. Raz, Y. Shavitt, and L. Zhang. On the placement of internet instrumentation. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. Kleinberg. Approximation algorithms for disjoint paths problems. Phd Thesis, MIT, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Kumar, R. Rastogi, A. Siberschatz, and B. Yener. Algorithms for provisioning virtual private networks in the hose model. In ACM SIGCOMM, pages 135--148, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. L. Li, M. Thottan, B. Yao, and S. Paul. Distributed network monitoring with bounded link utilization in ip networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. D. Lorenz, A. Orda, D. Raz, and Y. Shavit. How good can IP routing be? In DIMACS technical report: 2001-17, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Wang and K. Nahrsdedt. Hop-by-hop routing algorithms for premimum-class traffic in diffserv networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Traffic engineering of management flows by link augmentations on confluent trees

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SPAA '05: Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM symposium on Parallelism in algorithms and architectures
        July 2005
        346 pages
        ISBN:1581139861
        DOI:10.1145/1073970
        • General Chair:
        • Phil Gibbons,
        • Program Chair:
        • Paul Spirakis

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 July 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate447of1,461submissions,31%

        Upcoming Conference

        SPAA '24
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader