skip to main content
10.1145/1083292.1083294acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Value-based quality processes and results

Published: 17 May 2005 Publication History

Abstract

Cost effectiveness is one of the important issues for developing products in a life cycle. And review is a key activity that can detect defects from the early stage and fix them. This paper provides Value-based review techniques adding cost effectiveness into review processes and reports on an experiment on Value-based review. Through the experiment, the Value-based review is shown to have higher cost effectiveness in review processes.

References

[1]
Boehm, B and Turner, R. Balancing Agility and Discipline, Addison Wesley, 2004.
[2]
Fagan, M., Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development, IBM Sys. J IS(3), 1976, pp. 182--211
[3]
Gilb, T and Graham, D 1993. Software Inspection. Addison-Wesley, 1993.
[4]
Shull, F., Basili, V., Zelkowitz, M., Boehm, B., Brown, A, W., Port, D., Rus, I., and Tesoreiro, R., What we have learned about fighting defects, Proc, Intl. Conf. SW Metrics, June 2002.
[5]
Aurum, A., Petersson, H., and Wohlin, C., State-of-the-Art: software inspections after 25 years, Software Testing, Verification, and Reliability, Vol. 12, 2002, pp. 133--154.
[6]
A. Porter, L. Votta, and V. Basili, Comparing Detection Methods for software Requirement Inspection: a Replicated Experiment, IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol 21, no 6, pp. 563--575, june 1995.
[7]
Abdelrabi, Z. Cantone, E., Ciolkowski, M., and Rombach, D., Comparing code reading techniques applied to object-oriented software frameworks with regard to effectiveness and defect detection rate, Proc, ISESE 2004, pp 239--248.
[8]
Basili, V., Green, S., Laitenberger, O., Lanubile, F., Shull, F., Sorumgard, S., and Zelkowitz, M. The empirical investigation of perspective-based reading, Intl. J. Empirical SW. Engr., 1(2) 1996, pp.133--164.
[9]
Conradi, R,. and Wang, A. (eds.), Empirical Methods and Studies in Software Engineering: Experiences from ESERNET, Springer Verlag, 2003.
[10]
Thelin, T., Runeson, P., and Wohlin, C., Prioritized use cases as a vehicle for software inspections, Software, July/Aug 2003, pp. 30--33.
[11]
Denger, C., Ciolkowski, M., and Lanubile, F., Investing the active guidance factor in reading techniques for defect detection, Proc., ISESE 2004, pp. 219--228.
[12]
Berling, T., and Thelin, T., A case study of reading techniques in a software company, Proc., ISESE 2004, pp. 229--238.
[13]
Lee, K., Phongpaibul, M., and Boehm, B., Value-based verification and validation guidelines, Technical Report USC-CSE-2005-502, February 2005.
[14]
Boehm, B., Egyed, A., Kwan, J., Port, D., Shah, A., and Madachy, R., Using the Win Win Spiral Model: A Case Study, Computer, July 1998, pp. 33--44.
[15]
Boehm, B., Port, D., Abi-Antoun, M., and Egyed, A., Guidelines for the Life Cycle Objectives (LCO) and the Life Cycle Architecture (LCA) deliverables for Model-Based Architecting and Software Engineering (MBASE), USC Technical Report USC-CSE-98-519, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, February 1999.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
3-WoSQ: Proceedings of the third workshop on Software quality
May 2005
75 pages
ISBN:1595931228
DOI:10.1145/1083292
  • cover image ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
    ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes  Volume 30, Issue 4
    July 2005
    1514 pages
    ISSN:0163-5948
    DOI:10.1145/1082983
    Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 May 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cost effectiveness
  2. value- based review

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 7 of 11 submissions, 64%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media