skip to main content
10.1145/1089444.1089487acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Performance investigation of IEEE 802.11 MAC in multihop wireless networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 October 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Medium access control (MAC) protocols have a large impact on the achievable system performance for wireless ad hoc networks. Because of the limitations of existing analytical models for ad hoc networks, many researchers have opted to study the impact of MAC protocols via discrete-event simulations. However, as the network scenarios, traffic patterns and physical layer techniques may change significantly, simulation alone is not efficient to get insights into the impacts of MAC protocols on system performance. In this paper, we analyze the performance of IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function (DCF) in multihop network scenario. We are particularly interested in understanding how physical layer techniques may affect the MAC protocol performance. For this purpose, the features of interference range is studied and taken into account of the analytical model. Simulations with OPNET show the effectiveness of the proposed analytical approach.

References

  1. G. Bianchi. Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function. IEEE JSAC, 18:535--547, March 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. R. Boorstyn, A. Kershenbaum, B. Maglaris, and V. Sahin. Throughput analysis in multihop CSMA packet radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 35(3):267--274, March 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. F. Cali, M. Conti, and E. Gregori. Dynamic tuning of the IEEE 802.11 protocol to achieve a theoretical throughput limit. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 8(6):785--799, December 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Carvalho and J. Aceves. Scalable model for channel access protocols in multihop ad hoc networks. In ACM Mobicom'04, September 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. M. Carvalho and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. Delay analysis of IEEE 802.11 in single-hop networks. In Proc. of ICNP, pages 84--89, November 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. Chhaya and S. Gupta. Performance modeling of asynchronous data transfer methods of IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol. Wireless Networks, 3:217--234, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Foh and M. Zukerman. Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol. In Proc. of European Wireless, pages 184--190, February 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Gupta and P. Kumar. The capacity of wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 46(2), March 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. He, L. Zheng, Z. Yang, and C. Chou. Performance analysis and service differentiation in IEEE 802.11e EDCF. In Proc. of LCN, pages 184--190, October 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. He, L. Zheng, Z. Yang, and C. Chou. Investigation of service differentiation mechanisms for IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN. IEICE Tran. on Commun., June 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Hu and J. Zhang. MIMO ad hoc networks: medium access control, saturation throughput and optimal hop distance. Journal of Commun. and Networks, pages 317--330, December 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. IEEE. IEEE standard for wireless lan medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. November 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. OPNET Technologies Inc. OPNET modeler, http://www.opnet.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Johnson and D. Maltz. Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. Kluwer Mobile Computing, pages 153--181, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. L. Kleinrock and F. A. Tobagi. Packet switching in radio channels: Part I - carrier sense multiple-access modes and their throughput-delay characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Commun., 23(12):1400--1416, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Li, C. Blake, D. Couto, H. Lee, and R. Morris. Capacity of ad hoc wireless networks. ACM Mobicom, pages 61--69, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Robinson and T. Randhawa. Saturation throughput analysis of IEEE 802.11e enhanced distributed coordination function. IEEE JSAC, 22:917--928, June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. CMU Monarch Project Extensions to NS2. http://www.monarch.cs.cmu.edu/cmu-ns.html. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. F. A. Tobagi. Analysis of a two-hop centralized packet radio network - part I: Slotted aloha. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 28(2):196--207, February 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. F. A. Tobagi. Analysis of a two-hop centralized packet radio network - part II: Carrier sense multiple access. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 28(2):208--216, February 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. F. A. Tobagi and L. Kleinrock. Packet switching in radio channels: Part II - the hidden terminal problem in carrier sense multiple-access modes and the busy-tone solution. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 23(12):1417--1433, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Y. Wang and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. Performance of collision avoidance protocols in single-channel ad hoc networks. In Proc. of ICNP, pages 184--190, November 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. L. Wu and P. Varshney. Performance analysis of CSMA and BTMA protocols in multihop networks (i). single channel case. Information Sciences, 120:159--177, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Y. Xiao. A simple and effective priority scheme for IEEE 802.11. IEEE Communications Letters, 7:70--72, February 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. K. Xu, M. Gerla, and S. Bae. Effectiveness of RTS/CTS handshake in IEEE 802.11 based ad hoc networks. Journal of Ad Hoc Networks, pages 107--123, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Z. Yin and V. Leung. Performance improvements of integrating ad hoc operations into infrastructure IEEE 802.11 wireless local area networks. Computer Communications, October 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Performance investigation of IEEE 802.11 MAC in multihop wireless networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MSWiM '05: Proceedings of the 8th ACM international symposium on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems
        October 2005
        372 pages
        ISBN:1595931880
        DOI:10.1145/1089444

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 October 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        MSWiM '05 Paper Acceptance Rate48of165submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader