skip to main content
10.1145/1095890.1095901acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesancsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Design considerations for network processor operating systems

Published:26 October 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Network processors (NPs) promise a flexible, programmable packet processing infrastructure for network systems. To make full use of the capabilities of network processors, it is imperative to provide the ability to dynamically adapt to changing traffic patterns and to provide run-time support in the form of a network processor operating system. The differences to existing operating systems and the main challenges lie in the multiprocessor nature of NPs, their on-chip resources constraints, and the real-time processing requirements. In this paper, we explore the key design tradeoffs that need to be considered when designing a network processor operating system. In particular, we explore the performance impact of (1) application analysis for partitioning, (2) network traffic characterization, (3) workload mapping, and (4) run-time adaptation. We present and discuss qualitative and quantitative results in the context of a particular application analysis and mapping framework, but the observations and conclusions are generally applicable to any run-time environment for network processors.

References

  1. Baker, Z., and Prasanna, V. K. A methodology for synthesis of efficient intrusion detection systems on FPGAs. In Proc. of the IEEEConference on Field Programmable Custom Computing Machines(Napa, CA, Apr. 2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Elson, J., and Cerpa, A. Internet content adaptation protocol (ICAP). RFC3507, Network Working Group, Apr. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. EZchip Technologies Ltd. NP-110-Gigabit 7-Layer Network Processor. Yokneam, Israel, 2002. http://www.ezchip.com/html/pr_np-1.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gavrilovska, A., Schwan, K., Nordstrom, O., and Seifu, H. Network processors as building blocks in overlay networks. In Proc. of Hot Interconnects(Stanford, CA, Aug. 2003), ACM, pp. 83--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Goglin, S. D., Hooper, D., Kumar, A., and Yavatkar, R. Advanced software framework, tools, and languages for the IXP family. Intel Technology Journal 7, 4 (Nov. 2004), 64--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. IBM Corporation. IBMPower Network Processors, 2000. http://www.chips.ibm.com/products/wired/communications/network_processors.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Intel Corporation. Intel Second Generation Network Processor, 2002. http://www.intel.com/design/network/products/npfamily/ixp2400.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kohler, E., Morris, R., Chen, B., Jannotti, J., and Kaashoek, M. F. The Clickmodular router. ACMTransactions on Computer Systems 18, 3 (Aug. 2000), 263--297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kokku, R., Riché, T., Kunze, A., Mudigonda, J., Jason, J., and Vin, H. A case for run-time adaptation in packet processing systems. In Proc. of the 2nd Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HOTNETS-II)(Cambridge, MA, Nov. 2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lucent Technologies Inc. PayloadPlusTM Fast Pattern Processor, Apr. 2000. http://www.agere.com/support/non-nda/docs/FPPProductBrief.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Malloy, B. A., Lloyd, E. L., and Souffa, M. L. Scheduling DAG's for asynchronous multiprocessor execution. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 5, 5 (May 1994), 498--508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Memik, G., and Mangione-Smith, W. H. NEPAL: A framework for efficiently structuring applications for network processors. In Proc. of Second Network Processor Workshop (NP-2) in conjunction with Ninth International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA-9)(Anaheim, CA, Feb. 2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Motwani, R., and Raghavan, P. Randomized Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Plishker, W., Ravindran, K., Shah, N., and Keutzer, K. Automated task allocation for network processors. In Proc. of Network System Design Conference(Oct. 2004), pp. 235--245.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ramaswamy, R., Weng, N., and Wolf, T. Application analysis and resource mapping for heterogeneous network processor architectures. In Proc. of Third Workshop on Network Processors and Applications (NP-3) in conjunction with Tenth International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA-10)(Madrid, Spain, Feb. 2004), pp. 103--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramaswamy, R., Weng, N., and Wolf, T. Analysis of network processing workloads. In Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)(Austin, TX, Mar. 2005), pp. 226--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Shah, N., Plishker, W., and Keutzer, K. NP-Click: A programming model for the intel IXP1200. In Proc. of Second Network Processor Workshop (NP-2) in conjunction with Ninth International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA-9)(Anaheim, CA, Feb. 2003), pp. 100--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Taylor, D. E., Turner, J. S., Lockwood, J. W., and Horta, E. L. Dynamic hardware plugins: Exploiting reconfigurable hardware for high-performance programmable routers. Computer Networks 38, 3 (Feb. 2002), 295--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Teja Technologies. TejaNP Datasheet, 2003. http://www.teja.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Weng, N., and Wolf, T. Profiling and mapping of parallel workloads on network processors. In Proc. of The 20th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC)(Santa Fe, NM, Mar. 2005), pp. 890--896. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Wolf, T., and Franklin, M. A. CommBench - a telecommunications benchmark for network processors. In Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)(Austin, TX, Apr. 2000), pp. 154--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Design considerations for network processor operating systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ANCS '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Architecture for networking and communications systems
      October 2005
      230 pages
      ISBN:1595930825
      DOI:10.1145/1095890

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate88of314submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader