skip to main content
10.1145/1097064.1097096acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Towards topological consistency and similarity of multiresolution geographical maps

Published:04 November 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Several application contexts require the ability to use together and compare different geographic datasets (maps) concerning the same or overlapping areas. This is for example the case of mediator systems, integrating distinct data sources for query processing, and GISs dealing with multi-resolution maps. In both cases, distinct maps may represent the same geographic feature with different geometry type (a road can be a region in one map and a line in another one). An important issue is therefore determining whether two multi-resolution maps are consistent, i.e., they represent the same area without contradictions, and, if not, if they are at least similar. In this paper we consider consistency and similarity of multi-resolution maps with respect to topological information. Existing approaches do not take feature geometry type into account. In this paper, we extend them with two notions of topological consistency, the first requiring the same topological relation between pairs of common features, the second `relaxing' the first one by considering similarity between topological relations. A similarity function for multi-resolution maps is then provided, taking into account both feature geometry types and topological relations of map objects. We finally discuss how the proposed consistency and similarity concepts can be significantly used in GIS applications. Some experimental results are also reported to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

References

  1. ArcGIS Working With Geodatabase Topology. http://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/geodatabase-topology.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. H. T. Burns and M. J. Egenhofer. Similarity of Spatial Scenes. In Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Spatial Data Handling, pages 31--42, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Clementini, P. di Felice, and P. van Oosterom. A Small Set of Formal Topological Relationships Suitable for End-User Interaction. In LNCS 692: Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Advances in Spatial Databases, pages 277--295, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. J. Egenhofer and K. Al-Taha. Reasoning about Gradual Changes of Topological Relationships. In LNCS 639: Proc. of Theory and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space, pages 196--219, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. J. Egenhofer, E. Clementini, and P. di Felice. Evaluating Inconsistency Among Multiple Representations. In Proc. 6th Int. Symp. on Spatial Data Handling, pages 143--160, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. J. Egenhofer and R. D. Franzosa. Point-set Topological Spatial Relations. Int. Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 5(2):161--174, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. J. Egenhofer and J. Herring. Categorizing Binary Topological Relations Between Regions, Lines and Points in Geographic Databases. Tech. Rep., Dep. of Surveying Engineering, University of Maine, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. J. Egenhofer and D. Mark. Modeling Conceptual Neighborhoods of Topological Line-Region Relations. Int. Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 9(5):555--565, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Essid, O. Boucelma, F. M. Colonna, and Y. Lassoued. Query Processing in a Geographic Mediation Systems. In Proc. 12th ACM Int. Work. on Geographic Information Systems, pages 101--108, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. JTS Topology Suite. http://www.vividsolutions.com/jts/jtshome.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. OpenGeoSpatial Consortium. OpenGIS Simple Features Specification for SQL. Technical Report OGC 99-049, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Oracle Spatial User's Guide and Reference 10g. http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01 linebreak/appdev.101/b10826.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. N. Tryfona and M. J. Egenhofer. Multi-Resolution Spatial Databases: Consistency Among Networks. In Proc. 6th Int. Work. on Foundations of Models and Languages for Data and Objects, pages 119--132, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. N. Tryfona and M. J. Egenhofer. Consistency among Parts and Aggregates: A Computational Model. Transactions in GIS, 1(3):189--206, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. E. Puppo and G. Dettori. Towards a Formal Method for Multiresolution Spatial Maps. In Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Advances in Spatial Databases, pages 152--169, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Towards topological consistency and similarity of multiresolution geographical maps

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GIS '05: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international workshop on Geographic information systems
      November 2005
      306 pages
      ISBN:1595931465
      DOI:10.1145/1097064

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 November 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader