ABSTRACT
You may have browsed or searched one of the large Content Management Systems that store and display useful information; many universities, departments, and library research desks have turned to these to manage both their long-term reference materials and daily-changing data. What if we'd like to manage our own content, but our staff consists of one overworked, time-challenged, long-term-memory-impaired worker: ourself?My own information storage system was "heap-based:" several overflowing desktops of stacks of papers, journals, post-its, and scribbled memos. I needed something better, but didn't have anyone to give this project to and only a modest amount of time to devote to a new project myself.I decided to look at a range of open-source Content Management Systems (CMS) and compare freely-available packaged systems with a completely handmade system based on PHP and MySQL -- all topics with which I had little or no experience.Advantages to setting up a CMS like this (beyond organizing your own data) include gaining familiarity with concepts and systems that are likely to be increasingly important in the future. You may, if you wish, become a mentor to others with the same needs. The goal is to allow the wide-spread sharing of ideas and content without having to spend a lot of time fooling around with the technical details of presentation - a useful tool many people might be interested in.I hope my experience and conclusions will help you decide if a CMS is the answer to your data problems, and which path might be the best route for you to take.
- http://apache.org/Google Scholar
- Yank, K., Build Your Own Database Driven Website Using PHP & MySQL. Sitepoint, Victoria, Australia, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- http://www.softpress.com/kb/article.php?id=657Google Scholar
- http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/feature/595.htmlGoogle Scholar
- http://support.bryght.com/adminguide/how-toGoogle Scholar
- http://www.cmsmatrix.orgGoogle Scholar
- http://www.opensourcecms.com/Google Scholar
- http://www.drupal.org/Google Scholar
- http://www.mamboserver.com/Google Scholar
- http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~dsimpson/cms/Google Scholar
- http://plone.org/Google Scholar
- http://osuosl.org/Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Content for one: developing a personal content management system
Recommendations
Understaffed?: A Case Study in Empowering a User Community to Get a Large Project Done
SIGUCCS '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGUCCS Annual ConferenceThe University of Minnesota Duluth made the decision to transition the majority of its websites into Drupal, a content management system (CMS). Additionally, during the process the university's website underwent a complete redesign as well as a content ...
Plone and Content Management
In this column, the authors look at Plone, which they feel is one of the best content management systems available today. Even better, it's distributed under a free open-source license: the cost of getting started is only limited to the time you have ...
Automation is a breeze with AutoIt
SIGUCCS '05: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User servicesAutoIt is a free scripting language for Microsoft Windows that simulates Windows commands, mouse movements, and mouse-clicks; sends keystrokes to applications; and works with the clipboard to cut and paste text, among other tasks. Unlike many other ...
Comments