skip to main content
10.1145/1099554.1099688acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Intelligent GP fusion from multiple sources for text classification

Published:31 October 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper shows how citation-based information and structural content (e.g., title, abstract) can be combined to improve classification of text documents into predefined categories. We evaluate different measures of similarity -- five derived from the citation information of the collection, and three derived from the structural content -- and determine how they can be fused to improve classification effectiveness. To discover the best fusion framework, we apply Genetic Programming (GP) techniques. Our experiments with the ACM Computing Classification Scheme, using documents from the ACM Digital Library, indicate that GP can discover similarity functions superior to those based solely on a single type of evidence. Effectiveness of the similarity functions discovered through simple majority voting is better than that of content-based as well as combination-based Support Vector Machine classifiers. Experiments also were conducted to compare the performance between GP techniques and other fusion techniques such as Genetic Algorithms (GA) and linear fusion. Empirical results show that GP was able to discover better similarity functions than GA or other fusion techniques.

References

  1. R. Amsler. Application of citation-based automatic classification. Technical report, The University of Texas at Austin, Linguistics Research Center, Austin, TX, 1972.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. Calado, M. Cristo, E. S. de Moura, N. Ziviani, B. A. Ribeiro-Neto, and M. A. Gonçalves. Combining link-based and content-based methods for Web document classification. In Proc. of CIKM-03, pages 394--401, New Orleans, US, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Chakrabarti, B. Dom, and P. Indyk. Enhanced hypertext categorization using hyperlinks. In Proc. of SIGMOD, pages 307--318, Seattle, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. M. Cheang, K. H. Lee, and K. S. Leung. Data classification using genetic parallel programming. In GECCO-03, volume 2724 of LNCS, pages 1918--1919, Chicago, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. CITIDEL. Computing and Information Technology Interactive Digital Educational Library, www.citidel.org, 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Clack, J. Farringdon, P. Lidwell, and T. Yu. Autonomous document classification for business. In AGENTS-97, pages 201--208, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Cohn and T. Hofmann. The missing link - a probabilistic model of document content and hypertext connectivity. In NIPS 13, pages 430--436. MIT Press, 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Dean and M. R. Henzinger. Finding related pages in the World Wide Web. Computer Networks, 31(11--16):1467--1479, 1999. Also in Proceedings of the 8th International World Wide Web Conference.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. D. del Castillo and J. I. Serrano. A multistrategy approach for digital text categorization from imbalanced documents. SIGKDD, 6(1):70--79, 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Eggermont, J. N. Kok, and W. A. Kosters. Genetic programming for data classification: Refining the search space. In Proc. of BNAIC-03, pages 123--130, Nijmegen, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. W. Fan, E. A. Fox, P. Pathak, and H. Wu. The effects of fitness functions on genetic programming-based ranking discovery for web search. JASIST, 55(7):628--636, 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. W. Fan, M. D. Gordon, and P. Pathak. Discovery of context-specific ranking functions for effective information retrieval using genetic programming. TKDE-04, 16(4):523--527, 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. W. Fan, M. D. Gordon, P. Pathak, W. Xi, and E. A. Fox. Ranking function optimization for effective web search by genetic programming: An empirical study. In Proc. of HICSS-04, pages 105--112, Hawaii, 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Fisher and R. Everson. When are links useful? Experiments in text classification. In Proc. of ECIR-03, pages 41--56, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. Furnkranz. Exploiting structural information for text classification on the WWW. In IDA-99, pages 487--498, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. E. J. Glover, K. Tsioutsiouliklis, S. Lawrence, D. M. Pennock, and G. W. Flake. Using Web structure for classifying and describing Web pages. In Proc. of WWW-02, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Gordon. Probabilistic and genetic algorithms for document retrieval. CACM, 31(10):1208--1218, 1988.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. H. Holland. Adaption in Natural and Artificial Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. Joachims. Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In Proc. of ECML-98, pages 137--142, Chemnitz, Germany, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. T. Joachims, N. Cristianini, and J. Shawe-Taylor. Composite kernels for hypertext categorisation. In Proc. of ICML-01, pages 250--257, Williams College, US, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. N. Kampanya, R. Shen, S. Kim, C. North, and E. A. Fox. CitiViz: A visual user interface to the CITIDEL system. In Proc. of ECDL-04, pages 122--133, Bath, UK, 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. M. M. Kessler. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1):10--25, 1963.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. J. K. Kishore, L. M. Patnaik, V. Mani, and V. K. Agrawal. Application of genetic programming for multicategory pattern classification. IEEE TEC-00, 4(3):242--258, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. K. Kishore, L. M. Patnaik, V. Mani, and V. K. Agrawal. Genetic programming based pattern classification with feature space partitioning. Information Sciences, 131(1-4):65--86, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. R. Koza. Genetic programming: On the programming of computers by natural selection. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1992.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Krowne and E. A. Fox. An architecture for multischeming in digital libraries. In Proc. of ICADL-03, pages 563--577, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. W. B. Langdon. Data Structures and Genetic Programming: Genetic Programming + Data Structures = Automatic Programming! Kluwer, Boston, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. W. B. Langdon and R. Poli. Foundations of Genetic Programming. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S. Lawrence, C. L. Giles, and K. Bollacker. "Digital Libraries and Autonomous Citation Indexing". IEEE Computer, 32(6):67--71, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. T. M. Mitchell. Machine learning. McGraw Hill, New York, US, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. H.-J. Oh, S. H. Myaeng, and M.-H. Lee. A practical hypertext catergorization method using links and incrementally available class information. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 264--271, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. H. G. Small. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of relationship between two documents. JASIS, 24(4):265--269, 1973.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. A. Sun, E.-P. Lim, and W.-K. Ng. Web classification using support vector machine. In Proc. of WIDM-02, pages 96--99, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Y. Yang. Expert network: effective and efficient learning from human decisions in text categorisation and retrieval. In Proc. of SIGIR-94, pages 13--22, Dublin, IE, 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Y. Yang, S. Slattery, and R. Ghani. A study of approaches to hypertext categorization. JIIS, 18(2-3):219--241, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. B. Zhang, M. A. Gonçalves, W. Fan, Y. Chen, E. A. Fox, P. Calado, and M. Cristo. Intelligent fusion of structural and citation-based evidence for text classification. Technical Report TR-04-16, Computer Science, Virginia Tech, 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. B. Zhang, M. A. Gonçalves, and E. A. Fox. An OAI-based filtering service for CITIDEL from NDLTD. In Proc. of ICADL-03, pages 590--601, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Intelligent GP fusion from multiple sources for text classification

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CIKM '05: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
        October 2005
        854 pages
        ISBN:1595931406
        DOI:10.1145/1099554

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 31 October 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        CIKM '05 Paper Acceptance Rate77of425submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader