skip to main content
article

Evaluation of auditory displays: Comments on Bonebright et al., ICAD 1998

Published:01 October 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This commentary was written for the article “Data collection analysis techniques for evaluating the perceptual qualities of auditory stimuli” that was presented at the International Conference on Auditory Display in 1998. The original paper was written as a primer for research design and statistical evaluation of perceptual responses to auditory displays as well as a catalyst for the formation of interdisciplinary teams for such research. The authors' commentary notes that the ICAD community has shown an increase in cross-disciplinary collaboration but that researchers need to continue to improve their research designs and their statistical techniques to ensure accurate evaluation of auditory displays.

References

  1. Berque, D., Bonebright, T. L., Kinnett, S. Nichols, N., and Peters, A. 2003. A case study in the design of software that uses auditory cues to help low vision students view notes on a blackboard. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2003). Boston, MA. 307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonebright, T. L. 1996. An investigation of data collection methods for auditory stimuli: Paired comparisons versus a computer sorting task. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 28, 275--278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonebright, T. L. 1997. Vocal affect expression: A comparison of multidimensional scaling solutions for paired comparisons and computer sorting tasks using perceptual and acoustic measures. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 57 (12-B), 7762.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonebright, T. L. 2001. Perceptual structure of everyday sounds: A multidimensional scaling approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2001). Helsinki, Finland. 73--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonebright, T. L., Nees, M. A., Connerley, T. T., and Mccain, G. R. 2001. Testing the effectiveness of sonified graphs for education: A programmatic research project. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2001). Helsinki, Finland. 62--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewster, S. A. and Clarke, C. V. 1997. The design and evaluation of a sonically-enhanced tool palette. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 1997). Palo Alto, CA. 119--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kramer, G., Ed. 1994. Auditory Display: Sonification, Audification, and Auditory Interfaces, Vol. 28. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Proceedings Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kramer, G., Walker, B., Bonebright, T. L., Flowers, J. H., Miner, N. E., and Neuhoff, J. 1999. Sonification report: Status of the field and research agenda, ICAD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lepatre, G. and Brewster, S. A. 1998. An investigation of using music to provide navigation cues. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 1998). Glasgow, Scotland. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Martens, W. L. 2002. Rapid psychophysical calibration using bisection scaling for individualized control of source elevation in auditory display. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2002). Kyoto, Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Martens, W. L. 2004. Decoupled loudness and range control for a source located within a small virtual acoustic environment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2004). Sydney, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Miner, N. E. 1998. Creating wavelet-based models for real-time synthesis of perceptually convincing environmental sounds. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 59. (03-B), 1204. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Miner, N. E. and Caudell, T. P. 1997. Using wavelets to synthesize stochastic-based sounds for immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Displays (ICAD 1997). Palo Alto, CA. 69--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Miner, N. E., Goldsmith, T. E., and Caudell, T. 2002. Perceptual validation experiments for evaluating the quality of wavelet-synthesized sounds. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11, 508--524. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Neuhoff, J. G. 2001. Perceiving acoustic source orientation in the three-dimensional space. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2001). Helsinki, Finland. 111--116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Neuhoff, J. G., Kramer, G., and Wayand, J. 2000. Sonification and the interaction of perceptual dimensions: Can the data get lost in the map? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2000). Atlanta, GA. 93--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Valenzuela, M. L., Sansalone, M. J., Krumhansl, C. L., and Streett, W. B. 1997. Use of sound for the interpretation of impact-echo signals. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 1997). Palo Alto, CA. 47--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
    ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 2, Issue 4
    October 2005
    191 pages
    ISSN:1544-3558
    EISSN:1544-3965
    DOI:10.1145/1101530
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2005 ACM

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 October 2005
    Published in tap Volume 2, Issue 4

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader