skip to main content
10.1145/1108590.1108612acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesafrigraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Volumetric high dynamic range windowing for better data representation

Published:25 January 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Volume data is usually generated by measuring devices (eg. CT scanners, MRI scanners), mathematical functions (eg., Marschner/Lobb function), or by simulations. While all these sources typically generate 12 bit integer or floating point representations, commonly used displays are only capable of handling 8 bit gray or color levels. In a typical medical scenario, a 3D scanner will generate a 12 bit dataset, from which a subrange of the active full accuracy data range of 0 up to 4096 voxel values will be downsampled to an 8 bit per-voxel accuracy. This downsampling is usually achieved by a linear mapping operation and by clipping of value ranges left and right of the chosen subrange.In this paper, we propose a novel windowing operation that is based on methods from high dynamic range image mapping. With this method, the contrast of mapped 8 bit volume datasets is significantly enhanced, in particular if the imaging modality allows for a high tissue differentiation (eg., MRI). Thus, it also allows better and easier segmentation and classification. We demonstrate the improved contrast with different error metrics and a perception-driven image difference to indicate differences between three different high dynamic range operators.

References

  1. Adams, A. 1980. The Camera. The Ansel Adams Photography Series. Little, Brown and Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, A. 1983. The Print. The Ansel Adams Photography series. Little, Brown and Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashikhmin, M. 2002. A Tone Mapping Algorithm for High Contrast Images. In Proc. of Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Barco, 2003. MeDis Grayscale CRT Display Systems Product Brochure. Barco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardera, A., Feixas, M., and Boada, I. 2004. Normalized Similarity Measures for Medical Image Registration. In Proc. of SPIE Medical Imaging.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartz, D. 2002. Advanced Virtual Medicine: Techniques and Applications for Virtual Endoscopy. In ACM SIGGRAPH Course 52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Blommaert, F., and Martens, J. 1990. An Object-Oriented Model for Brightness Perception. Spatial Vision 5, 1, 15--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chiu, K., Herf, M., Shirley, P., Swamy, S., Wang, C., and Zimmerman, K. 1993. Spatially Nonuniform Scaling Functions for High Contrast Images. In Proc. of Graphics Interface, 245--253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Devlin, K. 2002. A Review of Tone Reproduction Techniques. Tech. Rep. 117, Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, November.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Drago, F., Myszkowski, K., Annen, T., and Chiba, N. 2003. Adaptive Logarithmic Mapping for Displaying High Contrast Scenes. Computer Graphics Forum 22, 3, 419--426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Durand, F., and Dorsey, J. 2002. Fast Bilateral Filtering for the Display of High Dynamic Range Image. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 257--265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fattal, R., Lischinski, D., and Werman, M. 2002. Gradient Domain High Dynamic Range Compression. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 249--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gonzalez, R., and Woods, R. 1992. Digital Image Processing. Addison-Wesleym, Reading. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kugler, A., Grunert, T., Becker, E., and Strasser, W. 1998. MEDStation: Bringing Together Medical Imaging and Diagnosis. In Proc. of European Multimedia, Microprocessor Systems and Electronic Commerce.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitchell, J., accessed 2004. Real-Time 3D Scene Post-Processing. Game Developer Conference 2003: http://www.ati.com/developer/gdc/GDC2003_ ScenePost-processing.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Petterson, H., accessed 2005. Window (The Encyclopaedia of Medical Imaging website). http://www.amershamhealth.com/medcyclopaedia/ medical.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. R. Mantiuk and K. Myszkowski and H. Seidel. 2004. Visible Difference Predicator for High Dynamic Range Images. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Systems. Man and Cybernetics, 2763--2769.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Reinhard, E., Stark, M., Shirley, P., and Ferwerda, J. 2002. Photographic Tone Reproduction for Digital Images. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 267--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Steinmetz, R. 2000. Multimedia Technologie - Grundlagen, Komponenten und Systeme, 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tumblin, J., and Turk, G. 1999. LCIS: A Boundary Hierarchy for Detail-Preserving Contrast Reduction. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 83--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Tumblin, J., Hodgins, J. K., and Guenter, B. 1999. Two Methods for Display of High Contrast Images. ACM Transactions on Graphics 1, 18 (January), 56--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Yuan, X., Nguyen, M., Chen, B., and Porter, D. 2005. High Dynamic Range Volume Visualization. In Proc. of IEEE Visualization, 327--334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Volumetric high dynamic range windowing for better data representation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          AFRIGRAPH '06: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Computer graphics, virtual reality, visualisation and interaction in Africa
          January 2006
          183 pages
          ISBN:1595932887
          DOI:10.1145/1108590

          Copyright © 2006 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 January 2006

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate47of90submissions,52%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader