skip to main content
article

Choice in the classroom

Published: 01 December 2005 Publication History

Abstract

Not all decisions that an instructor makes about a course are well-founded and set in stone. Indeed, for some decisions, students can be empowered with choices that allow them to take control of some aspects of their coursework. We describe two techniques for accomplishing this: time banks and contract weighting. Time banks are a way of allowing students to customize assignment deadlines; contract weighting is a novel derivation of contract grading which allows students to set their own assignment weights. Both have been tried in the classroom, and proffer benefits to the students and the instructor. Surprisingly, neither requires much effort from the instructor to implement. We report on six years' worth of experience with times banks and one year of experience with contract weighting.

References

[1]
Bunn Hiller, T., & Hietapelto, A. B. (2001). Contract grading: Encouraging commitment to the learning process. Journal of Management Education, 25, 660--684.
[2]
Gross Davis, B. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[3]
Karasek, R. A., Jr. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285--308.
[4]
Leff, L. L. (1998). Contract grading in teaching computer programming. Journal of Computer Science Education, 12, 16--22.
[5]
Marincovich, M. (Ed.) (2001). Teaching at Stanford: An introductory handbook for faculty, academic staff-teaching, and teaching assistants. Center for Teaching and Learning, Stanford University. Available: http://ctl.stanford.edu/teach/handbook.pdf.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Comparing the Impact of Strict and Flexible Deadline PoliciesProceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3641554.3701819(192-198)Online publication date: 12-Feb-2025
  • (2024)Student Perspectives on Assignment Deadline Policies in Computer Science CoursesProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630932(659-665)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Specifications and Contract Grading in Computer Science EducationProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630929(477-483)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 37, Issue 4
December 2005
184 pages
ISSN:0097-8418
DOI:10.1145/1113847
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2005
Published in SIGCSE Volume 37, Issue 4

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. assignments
  2. contract grading
  3. deadlines
  4. due dates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Comparing the Impact of Strict and Flexible Deadline PoliciesProceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3641554.3701819(192-198)Online publication date: 12-Feb-2025
  • (2024)Student Perspectives on Assignment Deadline Policies in Computer Science CoursesProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630932(659-665)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Specifications and Contract Grading in Computer Science EducationProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630929(477-483)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2023)The Value of Time Extensions in Identifying Students AbilitiesProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3587102.3588847(512-518)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media