skip to main content
article

A comparison of bidding strategies for simultaneous auctions

Published: 01 January 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Bidding for multiple items or bundles on online auctions raise challenging problems. We assume that an agent has a valuation function that returns its valuation for an arbitrary bundle. In the real world all or most of the items of interest to an agent is not present in a single combinatorial auction. We focus on bidding for multiple items in a set of auctions, each of which sell only a single unit of a particular item. Hence an agent has to bid in multiple auctions to obtain item bundles. While an optimal bidding strategy is known when bidding in sequential auctions, only suboptimal strategies are available when bidding for items sold in auctions running simultaneously. We investigate a hill-climbing bidding strategy, which is optimal given an infinite number of restarts, to decide on an agent's bid for simultaneous auctions. We provide a comparison of this algorithm with existing ones, both in terms of utilities generated and computation time, along with a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of these strategies.

References

[1]
BOUTILIER, C., GOLDSZMIDT, M., AND SABATA, B. 1999. Sequential auctions for the allocation of resources with complementarities. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 527-534.
[2]
CANDALE, T. 2005. Hill-climbing approach to bidding for bundles in simultaneous auctions. M.S. thesis, University of Tulsa.
[3]
GREENWALD, A. AND BOYAN, J. 2004. Bidding under uncertainty: theory and experiments. In AUAI '04: Proceedings of the 20th conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. AUAI Press, 209-216.
[4]
GREENWALD, A. AND BOYAN, J. 2005. Bidding algorithms for simultaneous auctions: A case study. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 10, 1, 67-89.
[5]
PARKES, D. C. 2001. Iterative combinatorial auctions: Achieving economic and computational efficiency. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
[6]
SANDHOLM, T. 2000. emediator: a next generation electronic commerce server. In AGENTS '00: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Autonomous agents. ACM Press, 341-348.
[7]
SEN, S., CANDALE, T., AND BASAK, S. 2005. Profit sharing auction. In Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2005).
[8]
STONE, P. AND GREENWALD, A. 2003. The first international trading agent competition: Autonomous bidding agents. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research.
[9]
STONE, P., SCHAPIRE, R. E., LITTMAN, M. L., CSIRIK, J. A., AND MCALLESTER, D. 2003. Decision-theoretic bidding based on learned density models in simultaneous, interacting auctions. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 19, 209-242.
[10]
WURMAN, P. R., WELLMAN, M. P., AND WALSH, W. E. 1998. The Michigan Internet AuctionBot: A configurable auction server for human and software agents. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents'98), K. P. Sycara and M. Wooldridge, Eds. ACM Press, New York, 301-308.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)E-BIDDER (Bidding is now on your fingers)International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology10.32628/CSEIT2172118(617-624)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2021
  • (2010)General auction-theoretic strategies for distributed partner selection in cooperative wireless networksIEEE Transactions on Communications10.1109/TCOMM.2010.082010.08024858:10(2903-2915)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010
  • (2007)Multi-dimensional bid improvement algorithm for simultaneous auctionsProceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence10.5555/1625275.1625472(1215-1220)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2007

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGecom Exchanges
ACM SIGecom Exchanges  Volume 5, Issue 5
January 2006
48 pages
EISSN:1551-9031
DOI:10.1145/1124566
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2006
Published in SIGECOM Volume 5, Issue 5

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. auctions
  2. bidding
  3. experimentation
  4. multi-dimensional bid improvement
  5. performance

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)E-BIDDER (Bidding is now on your fingers)International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology10.32628/CSEIT2172118(617-624)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2021
  • (2010)General auction-theoretic strategies for distributed partner selection in cooperative wireless networksIEEE Transactions on Communications10.1109/TCOMM.2010.082010.08024858:10(2903-2915)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010
  • (2007)Multi-dimensional bid improvement algorithm for simultaneous auctionsProceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence10.5555/1625275.1625472(1215-1220)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2007

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media