Article

Implications for design

Author:

Paul DourishAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 541 - 550

https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124855

Published: 22 April 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Although ethnography has become a common approach in HCI research and design, considerable confusion still attends both ethnographic practice and the criteria by which it should be evaluated in HCI. Often, ethnography is seen as an approach to field investigation that can generate requirements for systems development; by that token, the major evaluative criterion for an ethnographic study is the implications it can provide for design. Exploring the nature of ethnographic inquiry, this paper suggests that "implications for design" may not be the best metric for evaluation and may, indeed, fail to capture the value of ethnographic investigations.

References

[1]

Ackerman, M. 2000. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 179--203.

Digital Library

[2]

Anderson, R. 1994. Representation and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design. Human-Computer Interaction, 9(2), 151--182.

Digital Library

[3]

Bazerman, C. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

[4]

Becker, H. 1993. Theory: The Necessary Evil. In Flinders and Mills (eds), Theory and Concepts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives from the Field, 218--229. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

[5]

Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. 1997. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufman.

Digital Library

[6]

Button, G. 2000. The Ethnographic Tradition and Design. Design Studies, 21, 319--332.

[7]

Campbell, D. T. 1969. Ethnocentrism of Disciplines and the Fishscale Model of Omniscience. In: Sherif and Sherif (eds), Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences, 328--348. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

[8]

Clifford, C. 1983. On Ethnographic Authority. Representations, 2, 118--146.

[9]

Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

[10]

Cypher, A. 1993. Watch What I Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[11]

Dourish, P. and Button, G. 1998. On Technomethodology: Foundational Relationships between Ethnomethodology and Systems Design. Human-Computer Interaction, 13(4), 395--432.

Digital Library

[12]

Forsythe, D. 1989. It's Just a Matter of Common Sense: Ethnography as Invisible Work. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 8(1--2), 127--145.

Digital Library

[13]

Frost, P. and Stablien, R. (eds). 1992. Doing Exemplary Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

[14]

Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.

[15]

Gaver, W., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. 1999. Cultural Probes. interactions, 6(1), 21--29.

Digital Library

[16]

Geertz, C. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford University Press.

[17]

Geertz, C. 2000. Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton University Press.

[18]

Geiryn, T. 1983. Boundary Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(4), 781--795.

[19]

Grudin, J. 1990. The Computer Reaches Out: The Historical Continuity of Interface Design. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI'90 (Seattle, WA), 261--268. New York: ACM.

Digital Library

[20]

Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. 1997. Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley: University of California.

[21]

Hill, R. 1995. Blackfellas and Whitefellas: Aboriginal Land Rights, The Mabo Decision, and the Meaning of Land. Human Rights Quarterly, 17(2), 303--322.

[22]

Hughes, J., Randall, D., and Shapiro, D. 1993. From Ethnographic Record to System Design: Some Experiences from the Field. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 123--141.

[23]

Hutchinson, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N., Eiderbäck, B., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S., and Evans, H. 2003. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design For and With Families. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2003 (Ft Lauderdale, FL), 17--24. New York: ACM.

Digital Library

[24]

Kling, R., McKim, G., Fortuna, J. and King, A. 2000. Scientific Collaboratories as Socio-Technical Interaction Networks: A Theoretical Approach. American Conference on Information Systems.

[25]

Levi-Strauss, C. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

[26]

Mackay, W. 1990. Patterns of Sharing Customizable Software. Proc. ACM Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW'90 (Los Angeles, CA), 209-221. New York: ACM.

Digital Library

[27]

MacLean, A., Carter, K., Lövstrand, L., and Moran, T. 1990. User-Tailorable Systems: Pressing the Issues with Buttons. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI'90 (Seattle, WA). New York: ACM.

Digital Library

[28]

Malinowski, B. 1967. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge.

[29]

Marcus, G. 1995. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95--117.

[30]

Marcus, G. and Fischer, M. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[31]

Miller, D. and Slater, D. 2000. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg.

[32]

Nardi, B. 1993. A Small Matter of Programming: Perspectives on End-User Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Digital Library

[33]

Plowman, L., Rogers, Y., and Ramage, M. 1995. What are Workplace Studies For? Proc. European Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'95 (Stockholm, Sweden). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Digital Library

[34]

Povinelli, E. 1995. Do Rocks Listen? The Cultural Politics of Apprehending Aboriginal Labor. American Anthropologist, 97(3), 505--518.

[35]

Rogers, Y. 1997. Reconfiguring the Social Scientist: Shifting from Telling Designers What to Do to Getting More Involved. In Bowker et al., Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. London: Erlbaum.

[36]

Schmidt, K. 2000. The Critical Role of Workplace Studies in CSCW. In Heath, Hindmarsh, and Luff (eds), Workplace Studies: Rediscovering Work Practice and Informing Design. Cambridge University Press.

[37]

Suchman, L. 2002. Practice-Based Design of Information Systems: Notes from the Hyperdeveloped World. The Information Society, 18, 139--144.

Cited By

Kaltenhauser ASavino Gvon Felten NSchöning J(2025)CHI's Greatest Hits: Analyzing the 100 Most-Cited Papers in 43 Years of Research at ACM CHIInteractions10.1145/370480432:1(28-33)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3704804
Berkholz JRahman AStevens G(2025)Playing with Privacy: Exploring the Social Construction of Privacy Norms Through a Card GameProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/37012029:1(1-23)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3701202
Wang S(2025)Data auxiliaries: making online dating ‘work’ with dating spreadsheetsInformation, Communication & Society10.1080/1369118X.2025.2474564(1-18)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2474564
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Implications for design
1. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

Responsibilities and implications: further thoughts on ethnography and design
DUX '07: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing for User eXperiences

Many researchers and practitioners in user experience design have turned towards social sciences to find ways to understand the social contexts in which both users and technologies are embedded. Ethnographic approaches are increasingly prominent as ...
Design ethnography in information systems

Until recently, most ethnographic research in information systems has been based on the traditional anthropological model of ethnography. In this traditional model of ethnography, one of the most important data-gathering techniques is participant ...
Al Osool: Understanding information behavior for community development at Za'atari Syrian refugee camp
C&T '19: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities

Za'atari Syrian Refugee Camp in Jordan is home to about 83,000 people fleeing the violence in Syria. Building on a multi-year engagement at Za'atari, we developed an information-enabled community engagement approach to identify and address challenges at ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2006

1353 pages

ISBN:1595933727

DOI:10.1145/1124772

Editors:
Rebecca Grinter
Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
,
Thomas Rodden
University of Nottingham, UK
,
Paul Aoki
Intel, USA
,
Ed Cutrell
Microsoft, USA
,
Robin Jeffries
Google, USA
,
Gary Olson
University of Michigan, USA

Copyright © 2006 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 April 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

CHI06

Sponsor:

CHI06: CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 22 - 27, 2006

Québec, Montréal, Canada

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

527
Total Citations
View Citations
10,941
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)837
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)84

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Kaltenhauser ASavino Gvon Felten NSchöning J(2025)CHI's Greatest Hits: Analyzing the 100 Most-Cited Papers in 43 Years of Research at ACM CHIInteractions10.1145/370480432:1(28-33)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3704804
Berkholz JRahman AStevens G(2025)Playing with Privacy: Exploring the Social Construction of Privacy Norms Through a Card GameProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/37012029:1(1-23)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3701202
Wang S(2025)Data auxiliaries: making online dating ‘work’ with dating spreadsheetsInformation, Communication & Society10.1080/1369118X.2025.2474564(1-18)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2474564
Putro BRosmansyah YSuhardi Hadi SPutra RRachman E(2025)A learning service computing model in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL)Interactive Learning Environments10.1080/10494820.2024.2443777(1-26)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2443777
Duc Son N(2024)Exploring User Cultural Identity in Shaping Reflective Design Style on Interactive User InterfacesUser Experience - A Multidimensional Analysis of Human-Artefact Interactions [Working Title]10.5772/intechopen.1007184Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1007184
Díaz MSmith ADas SGreen BVarshney KGanapini MRenda A(2024)What Makes an Expert? Reviewing How ML Researchers Define "Expert"Proceedings of the 2024 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society10.5555/3716662.3716693(358-370)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3716662.3716693
Wang SCooper NEby M(2024)From human-centered to social-centered artificial intelligence: Assessing ChatGPT's impact through disruptive eventsBig Data & Society10.1177/2053951724129022011:4Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241290220
Wu YMiller AChung CKaziunas E(2024)"The struggle is a part of the experience": Engaging Discontents in the Design of Family Meal TechnologiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870168:CSCW2(1-33)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3687016
Goree SAppleby GCrandall DSu N(2024)Attention is All They Need: Exploring the Media Archaeology of the Computer Vision Research PaperProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869558:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686955
Resor E(2024)Simple Scores are Messy Signals: How Users Interpret Scores on Real Estate PlatformsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869358:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686935
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten