skip to main content
10.1145/112646.112682acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicailConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Networks at work: a connectionist approach to non-deductive legal reasoning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 May 1991Publication History
First page image

References

  1. Anderson J.R. (1983) The Architecture of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Ma. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bench-Capon T, Sergot M.J. (1985) Towards a role based representation of open texture in law, Imperial College of Science and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Breuker J., Wielinga B. (1988) Models of Expertise in Knowledge Acquisition, in Topics in Expert System Design: Methodologies and Tools, Guida G. & Tasso C. (eds), North Holland, Amsterdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fernhout F. (1989) Using a Parallel Distributed Processing Model as part of a Legal Expert System, in Pre-Proceedings of Third International Conference on Logica, Informatim, Diritto, Vol. I, Martino A.A. (ed.), Florence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Laird J.E, Rosenbloom P.S, Newell A (1986), Chunking in SOAR: The anatomy of a general learning mechanism, in Machine Learning 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gardner A. v.d.L. (1987)An AmJicial intelligence Approach to Legal Reasoning, Bradford Books/The MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Opdorp G.J van, Walker R.F. (1990) A neural network approach to open texture, in Amongst friends in Computers and Law, Kaspersen H.W.K, Oskamp A. (eds), Kluwer, Deventer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Oskamp A., Walker R.F., Schrickx J.A., Opdorp G.J van, Berg P.H. van den (1989) PROLEXS, DIVIDE AND RULE: a legal application, in Proceedings ICAIL '89, Vancouver, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Phillppa L. (1989)Arc Lcsal Dcclalona baaed on the Application of Rules or Prototypes Recognition? Legal Science on the way to Neural Networks, in Pre-Proceedings of Third International Conference on Logica, Informatica, Diritto, Vol. II, Martino A.A. (ed.), Florence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Popper K.R (1968) The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Harper & Row, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Quinlan J.R (1986) Induction of decision trees, in Machine Learning 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Rissland E.L., Ashley K.D. (1988) Credit assignment and the problent of competing factors in case-based reasoning, in Proceedings Case-Based Reasoning Workshop, DARPA, Clearwater Beach.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rissland E.L., Ashley K.D. (1989), HYPO: A Precedent- Based Legal Reasoner, in Law and Information Technology, Prof. Dr. G.P.V. Vandenberghe (ed.), Kluwer, Deventer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Rissland E.L., Skalak D.B. (1989), Interpreting Statutory Predicates, in Proceedings ICAIL '89, Vancouver, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rose D.E., Belew R.K. (1989), Legal Information Retrieval: A Hybrid Approach, in Proceedings iCAIL 89, Vancouver, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rumelhart D.E, Hinton G.E, Williams R.J (1986) Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation, in Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructttres of cognition Vol. I, Rumelhart D.E., Mccleland J.L & The PDP Research Group (eds), Cambridge, Massachusetts. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rumelhart D.E., Mccleland J.L & The PDP Research Group (1986), Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructures of cognition, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Schrickx J.A. (1989) Prolexs-formalization, a way to enhance validation, in Legal Knowledge System& An overview of criteria for validation and practical use, Kracht D, Vey Mestdagh C.N.J de, Svensson J.S (eds), Koninklijke Vermande.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Susskind R.E. (1987) Expert systems in law, Clarendon Press, Oxford. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Walker R.F., Berg P.H. van den, Zeinstra P.G.M. (1989) A model to model knowledge about knowledge, in Law a~d Information Technology, Prof. Dr. G.P.V. Vandenberghe (ed.), Kluwer, Deventer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Walker R.F., Oskamp A., Schrickx J.A., Opdorp G.J. van, Berg P.H. van den (1991) PROLEXS: Creating Law and Order in a Heterogeneous Domain, in Int. J. of Man-Machine Studies, to be published. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wildt, J.H. de, Quast J.A., Kenmerken van LEiDRAAD, een kennissysteem voor de werkloosheidswet, in Proceedings Ai toepassingen '89, SIC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Zadeh L.A. (1975) Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning, in Synthese vol. 30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Zijl P.H. van, Wolf C. de (1973) Her begrip {oassende arbeid' in de sociale zekerheidsregelingen, SMA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Networks at work: a connectionist approach to non-deductive legal reasoning

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  ICAIL '91: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
                  May 1991
                  309 pages
                  ISBN:089791399X
                  DOI:10.1145/112646

                  Copyright © 1991 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 1 May 1991

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate69of169submissions,41%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader