skip to main content
10.1145/1133265.1133283acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Improving scalability and awareness in iconic interfaces for multiple-device environments

Published:23 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Iconic interfaces offer a promising interaction metaphor for effectively managing applications in multi-device environments. However, current implementations scale poorly for even a modest number of applications and do not allow users to maintain adequate awareness of the workspace. To overcome these limitations, we have designed new interaction techniques and prototyped them within a new iconic interface. Our interface uses zooming and animation-based interactions to improve scalability and uses application icons and portal views with real-time updates to enhance awareness. Results from a user study confirm the efficacy of these techniques. These techniques can be used to improve the broader class of iconic and portal-based interfaces.

References

  1. Bederson, B. B., J. Grosjean and J. Meyer. Toolkit Design for Interactive Structured Graphics. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30 (8), 535--546, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Biehl, J. T. and B. P. Bailey. ARIS: An Interface for Application Relocation in an Interactive Space. Proceedings of Graphics Interface, 2004, 107--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Biehl, J. T. and B. P. Bailey. A Toolset for Constructing and Supporting Iconic Interfaces for Interactive Workspaces. Proc. INTERACT, 2005, 699--712. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chang, B. and D. Ungar. Animation: From Cartoons to the User Interface. UIST, 1993, 45--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Endsley, M. R. Direct Measurement of Situation Awareness: Validity and Use of SAGAT. in Endsley, M. R. and Garland, D. J. eds. Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2000, 147--174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Endsley, M. R., Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 1988, 789--795.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Gutwin, C. and S. Greenberg. A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware. Journ. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (3--4), 411--446, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Johanson, B., A. Fox and T. Winograd. The Interactive Workspaces Project: Experiences with Ubiquitous Computing Rooms. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 1 (2), 67--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kahn, A., G. et. al. A Remote Control Interface for Large Displays. UIST, 2004, 127--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lewis, J. R. Ibm Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. International J. Human-Computer Interaction, 7 (1), 57--78, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. MacIntyre, B., et al. Support for Multitasking and Background Awareness Using Interactive Peripheral Displays. UIST, 2001, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Miller, G. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two. The Psychological Review, 63, 81--97, 1956.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ponnekanti, S. R., B. Lee, A. Fox, P. Hanrahan and T. Winograd. Icrafter: A Service Framework for Ubiquitous Computing Environments. Proc. Ubiquitous Computing, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rekimoto, J. and M. Saitoh. Augmented Surfaces: A Spatially Continuous Work Space for Hybrid Computing Environments. CHI, 1999, 378--385. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Román, M., et. al. Gaia: A Middleware Infrastructure to Enable Active Spaces. IEEE Pervasive Comp., 1 (4), 74--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Shen, C., K. M. Everitt and K. Ryall. Ubitable: Impromptu Face-to-Face Collaboration on Horizontal Interactive Surfaces. Proc. Ubiquitous Computing, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Streitz, N. A. and e. al. I-Land: An Interactive Landscape for Creativity and Innovation. CHI, 1999, 120--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Tang, J. Findings from Observational Studies of Collaborative Work. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies, 34 (2), 143--160, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improving scalability and awareness in iconic interfaces for multiple-device environments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AVI '06: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
        May 2006
        512 pages
        ISBN:1595933530
        DOI:10.1145/1133265
        • General Chair:
        • Augusto Celentano

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 May 2006

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate107of408submissions,26%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader