skip to main content
10.1145/1135777.1135851acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Bootstrapping semantics on the web: meaning elicitation from schemas

Published: 23 May 2006 Publication History

Abstract

In most web sites, web-based applications (such as web portals, e-marketplaces, search engines), and in the file systems of personal computers, a wide variety of schemas (such as taxonomies, directory trees, thesauri, Entity-Relationship schemas, RDF Schemas) are published which (i) convey a clear meaning to humans (e.g. help in the navigation of large collections of documents), but (ii) convey only a small fraction (if any) of their meaning to machines, as their intended meaning is not formally/explicitly represented. In this paper we present a general methodology for automatically eliciting and representing the intended meaning of these structures, and for making this meaning available in domains like information integration and interoperability, web service discovery and composition, peer-to-peer knowledge management, and semantic browsers. We also present an implementation (called CtxMatch2) of how such a method can be used for semantic interoperability.

References

[1]
Y. An, A. Borgida, and J. Mylopoulos. Constructing complex semantic mappings between xml data and ontologies. In Y. Gil, E. Motta, V. R. Benjamins, and M. A. Musen, editors, 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC'05), LNCS 3729, pages 6--20. Springer, 2005.]]
[2]
F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. F. Patel-Schneider, editors. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2003.]]
[3]
M. Bonifacio, P. Bouquet, G. Mameli, and M. Nori. Kex: a peer-to-peer solution for distributed knowledge management. In D. Karagiannis and U. Reimer, editors, Fourth International Conference on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management (PAKM-2002), Vienna (Austria), 2002.]]
[4]
A. Borgida, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati. Description logics for databases. In F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. Patel-Schneider, editors, The Description Logics Handbook, chapter 16, pages 472--494. Cambridge University Press, 2002.]]
[5]
P. Bouquet, L. Serafini, and S. Zanobini. Semantic coordination: A new approach and an application. In D. Fensel, K. Sycara, and J. Mylopoulos, editors, The Semantic Web - ISWC 2003, LNCS 2870, pages 130--145, Sanibel Island (FL, USA), Springer, 2003.]]
[6]
P. Bouquet, L. Serafini, and S. Zanobini. Peer-to-peer semantic coordination. Journal of Web Semantics, 2(1), 2005.]]
[7]
P. Bouquet, M. Yatskevich, and S. Zanobini. Critical analysis of mapping languages and mapping techniques. Technical Report DIT-05-052, DIT-University of Trento, 2005.]]
[8]
C. Fellbaum, editor. wordnet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-06197-X.]]
[9]
F. Giunchiglia, M. Marchese, and I. Zaihrayeu. Towards a theory of formal classification. Technical Report DIT-05-048, DIT University of Trento, 2005.]]
[10]
F. Giunchiglia, P. Shvaiko, and M. Yatskevich. S-match: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching. In Y. Kalfoglou, M. Schorlemmer, A. Sheth, S. Staab, and M. Uschold, editors, Semantic Interoperability and Integration, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 04391, 2005.]]
[11]
P. Hayes. RDF Semantics - W3C Recommendation 10 Feb 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/.]]
[12]
B. Magnini, L. Serafini, and M. Speranza. Making explicit the semantics hidden in schema models. In A. Cappelli and F. Turini, editors, 8th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, Pisa, Italy, LNAI 2829, pages 436--448. Springer, 2003.]]
[13]
L. L. McGuinness and F. van Harmelen. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview - W3C Recommendation 10 Feb 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.]]
[14]
R. Möller and V. Haarslev. Description logic systems. In F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. Patel-Schneider, editors, The Description Logic Handbook, chapter 8, pages 282--305. Cambridge University Press, 2003.]]
[15]
A. H. P. Cimiano and S. Staab. Learning concept hierarchies from text corpora using formal concept analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 24:305--339, 2005.]]
[16]
A. L. Rector, J. E. Rogers, and P. A. Pole. The Galen high level ontology. In Proceedings MIE 96, pages 174--178. IOS Press, 1996.]]
[17]
L. Serafini, S. Sceffer, and S. Zanobini. Semantic coordination of hierarchical classifications with attributes. Technical Report T04-12-04, ITC-IRST, 2004.]]
[18]
S. Tiun, R. Abdullah, and T. Enyakong. Automatic topic identification using ontology hierarchy. In 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing-2001), 2001.]]
[19]
M. van Assem, M. R. Menken, G. Schreiber, J. Wielemaker, and B. Wielinga. A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL. In Proceedings of the Third International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC'04), LNCS 3298, pages 17--31, Hiroshima (Japan), Springer, 2004]]
[20]
L. L. Whyte, A. G. Wilson, and D. Wilson, editors. Hierarchical structures. American Elsevier, 1969.]]

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Efficient High-Level Semantic Enrichment of Undocumented Enterprise DataThe Semantic Web: ESWC 2019 Satellite Events10.1007/978-3-030-32327-1_41(220-230)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2019
  • (2015)Resolving Interoperability in Concurrent EngineeringConcurrent Engineering in the 21st Century10.1007/978-3-319-13776-6_6(133-163)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2015
  • (2013)Using Semantics to Discover Web Services Based on Partial DataInternational Journal of Strategic Information Technology and Applications10.4018/ijsita.20131001034:4(44-59)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WWW '06: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web
May 2006
1102 pages
ISBN:1595933239
DOI:10.1145/1135777
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 May 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. meaning elicitation
  2. schema matching
  3. semantic web

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

WWW06
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Efficient High-Level Semantic Enrichment of Undocumented Enterprise DataThe Semantic Web: ESWC 2019 Satellite Events10.1007/978-3-030-32327-1_41(220-230)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2019
  • (2015)Resolving Interoperability in Concurrent EngineeringConcurrent Engineering in the 21st Century10.1007/978-3-319-13776-6_6(133-163)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2015
  • (2013)Using Semantics to Discover Web Services Based on Partial DataInternational Journal of Strategic Information Technology and Applications10.4018/ijsita.20131001034:4(44-59)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013
  • (2013)ThesIS: A semantic interoperability service for a middleware service oriented architectureProceedings of the 2013 IEEE 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD)10.1109/CSCWD.2013.6580976(281-286)Online publication date: Jun-2013
  • (2013)Overview of Matching SystemsOntology Matching10.1007/978-3-642-38721-0_8(201-283)Online publication date: 2013
  • (2013)Global Matching MethodsOntology Matching10.1007/978-3-642-38721-0_6(121-148)Online publication date: 2013
  • (2013)Knowledge Engineering via Human ComputationHandbook of Human Computation10.1007/978-1-4614-8806-4_13(131-151)Online publication date: 20-Nov-2013
  • (2012)Detection and resolution of semantic inconsistency and redundancy in an automatic ontology merging systemJournal of Intelligent Information Systems10.1007/s10844-012-0202-y39:2(535-557)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2012
  • (2011)Towards ensuring Satisfiability of Merged OntologyProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2011.04.2424(2216-2225)Online publication date: 2011
  • (2011)Knowledge-based sense disambiguation (almost) for all structuresInformation Systems10.1016/j.is.2010.08.00436:2(406-430)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2011
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media