skip to main content
10.1145/1140104.1140119acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

An evaluation of availability latency in carrier-based wehicular ad-hoc networks

Published:25 June 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

On-demand delivery of audio and video clips in peer-to-peer vehicular ad-hoc networks is an emerging area of research. Our target environment uses data carriers, termed zebroids, where a mobile device carries a data item on behalf of a server to a client thereby minimizing its availability latency. In this study, we quantify the variation in availability latency with zebroids as a function of a rich set of parameters such as car density, storage per device, repository size, and replacement policies employed by zebroids. Using analysis and extensive simulations, we gain novel insights into the design of carrier-based systems. Significant improvements in latency can be obtained with zebroids at the cost of a minimal overhead. These improvements occur even in scenarios with lower accuracy in the predictions of the car routes. Two particularly surprising findings are: (1) a naive random replacement policy employed by the zebroids shows competitive performance, and (2) latency improvements obtained with a simplified instantiation of zebroids are found to be robust to changes in the popularity distribution of the data items.

References

  1. Federal Highway Administration. Corridor simulation. Version 5.1, http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/trafficanalysistools/cors im.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Aldous and J. Fill. Reversible markov chains and random walks on graphs. Under preparation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Bar-Noy, I. Kessler, and M. Sidi. Mobile Users: To Update or Not to Update. In IEEE Infocom, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. Burgess, B. Gallagher, D. Jensen, and B. Levine. MaxProp: Routing for Vehicle-Based Disruption-Tolerant Networking. In IEEE Infocom, April 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. E. Cohen and S. Shenker. Replication Strategies in Unstructured Peer-to-Peer Networks. In SIGCOMM, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Dan, D. Dias, R. Mukherjee, D. Sitaram, and R. Tewari. Buffering and Caching in Large-Scale Video Servers. In COMPCON, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Ghandeharizadeh, S. Kapadia, and B. Krishnamachari. PAVAN: A Policy Framework for Content Availabilty in Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks. In VANET, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Ghandeharizadeh, S. Kapadia, and B. Krishnamachari. Comparison of Replication Strategies for Content Availability in C2P2 networks. In MDM, May 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Ghandeharizadeh, S. Kapadia, and B. Krishnamachari. An Evaluation of Availability Latency in Carrier-based Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California,CENG-2006-1, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Ghandeharizadeh and B. Krishnamachari. C2p2: A peer-to-peer network for on-demand automobile information services. In Globe. IEEE, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. T. Hara. Effective Replica Allocation in Ad Hoc Networks for Improving Data Accessibility. In IEEE Infocom, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H. Hayashi, T. Hara, and S. Nishio. A Replica Allocation Method Adapting to Topology Changes in Ad Hoc Networks. In DEXA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Juang, H. Oki, Y. Wang, M. Martonosi, L. Peh, and D. Rubenstein. Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: design tradeoffs and early experiences with ZebraNet. SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Pentland, R. Fletcher, and A. Hasson. DakNet: Rethinking Connectivity in Developing Nations. Computer, 37(1):78--83, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. F. Sailhan and V. Issarny. Cooperative Caching in Ad Hoc Networks. In MDM, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. Shah, S. Roy, S. Jain, and W. Brunette. Data mules: Modeling and analysis of a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks. Elsevier Ad Hoc Networks Journal, 1, September 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. T. Spyropoulos, K. Psounis, and C. Raghavendra. Single-Copy Routing in Intermittently Connected Mobile Networks. In SECON, April 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Tanenbaum. Modern Operating Systems, 2nd Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.4 . Prentice Hall, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Vahdat and D. Becker. Epidemic routing for partially-connected ad hoc networks. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Duke University, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. W. Zhao, M. Ammar, and E. Zegura. A message ferrying approach for data delivery in sparse mobile ad hoc networks. In MobiHoc, pages 187-198, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Zonoozi and P. Dassanayake. User Mobility Modeling and Characterization of Mobility Pattern. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 15:1239--1252, September 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. An evaluation of availability latency in carrier-based wehicular ad-hoc networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiDE '06: Proceedings of the 5th ACM international workshop on Data engineering for wireless and mobile access
      June 2006
      104 pages
      ISBN:1595934367
      DOI:10.1145/1140104

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 June 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate23of59submissions,39%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader