skip to main content
10.1145/1140491.1140518acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapgvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Efficient selective rendering of participating media

Published:28 July 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Realistic image synthesis is the process of computing photorealistic images which are perceptually and measurably indistinguishable from real-world images. In order to obtain high fidelity rendered images it is required that the physical processes of materials and the behavior of light are accurately modelled and simulated. Most computer graphics algorithms assume that light passes freely between surfaces within an environment. However, in many applications, ranging from evaluation of exit signs in smoke filled rooms to design of efficient headlamps for foggy driving, realistic modelling of light propagation and scattering is required. The computational requirements for calculating the interaction of light with such participating media are substantial. This process can take many minutes or even hours. Many times rendering efforts are spent on computing parts of the scene that will not be perceived by the viewer. In this paper we present a novel perceptual strategy for physically-based rendering of participating media. By using a combination of a saliency map with our new extinction map (X-map) we can significantly reduce rendering times for inhomogenous media. We also validate the visual quality of the resulting images using two objective difference metrics and a subjective psychophysical experiment. Although the average pixel errors of these metric are all less than 1%, the experiment using human observers indicate that these degradation in quality is still noticeable in certain scenes, unlike previous work has suggested.

References

  1. Bolin, M. R., and Meyer, G. W. 1995. A frequency based ray tracer. In SIGGRAPH, 409--418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bolin, M. R., and Meyer, G. W. 1998. A perceptually based adaptive sampling algorithm. Computer Graphics 32, Annual Conference Series, 299--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cater, K., Chalmers, A., and Ward, G. 2003. Detail to attention: exploiting visual tasks for selective rendering. In EGRW '03: Proc. of the 14th Eurographics workshop on Rendering, Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 270--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Daly, S. 1993. The Visible Differences Predictor: An Algorithm for the Assessment of Image Fidelity. In Digital Images and Human Vision, A.B. Watson, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 179--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Debattista, K., and Chalmers, A. 2005. Component-based adaptive sampling. In SIBGRAPI 2005, IEEE Computer Society Press, 375--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Deussen, O., Keller, A., Bala, K., Dutré, P., Fellner, D. W., and Spencer, S. N., Eds. Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering Techniques, Konstanz, Germany, June 29 - July 1, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dumont, R., Pellacini, F., and Ferwerda, J. A. 2003. Perceptually-driven decision theory for interactive realistic rendering. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 2, 152--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ferwerda, J. A., Pattanaik, S. N., Shirley, P., and Greenberg, D. P. 1997. A model of visual masking for computer graphics. Computer Graphics 31, Annual Conference Series, 143--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Glassner, A. S. 1994. Principles of Digital Image Synthesis. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gutierrez, D., Munoz, A., Anson, O., and Serón, F. J. 2005. Non-linear volume photon mapping. In Proc. of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering Techniques, Konstanz, Germany, June 29 - July 1, 2005, 291--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Haber, J., Myszkowski, K., Yamauchi, H., and Seidel, H.-P. 2001. Perceptually Guided Corrective Splatting. In Computer Graphics Forum, Proc. of Eurographics 2001, Blackwell, Manchester, UK, A. Chalmers and T.-M. Rhyne, Eds., vol. 20 of Computer Graphics Forum, Eurographics, C142--C152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Itti, L., Koch, C., and Niebur, E. 1998. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 11, 1254--1259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kajiya, J. T. 1986. The rendering equation. In SIGGRAPH '86: Proc. of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 143--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Longhurst, P., Debattista, K., Gillibrand, R., and Chalmers, A. 2005. Analytic antialiasing for selective high fidelity rendering. In SIBGRAPI 2005, IEEE Computer Society Press, 359--366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Longhurst, P., Debattista, K., and Chalmers, A. 2006. A gpu based saliency map for high-fidelity selective rendering. In AFRIGRAPH 2006 4th Int. Conf. on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality, Visualisation and Interaction in Africa, ACM SIGGRAPH, 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Martens, W., and Myszkowski, K. 1998. Psychophysical validation of the visible differences predictor for global illumination applications. In IEEE Visualization '98 (Late Breaking Hot Topics), 49--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitchell, D. P. 1987. Generating antialiased images at low sampling densities. In SIGGRAPH '87: Proc. of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, 65--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Myszkowski, K. 1998. The visible differences predictor: Applications to global illumination problems. In Proc. of the Eurographics Workshop, 223--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Myszkowski, K. 2002. Perception-based global illumination, rendering, and animation techniques. In SCCG '02: Proc. of the 18th spring conference on Computer graphics, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 13--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Perez, F., Pueyo, X., and Sillion, F. X. 1997. Global illumination techniques for the simulation of participating media. In Proc. of the Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques '97, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 309--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Prikryl, J. 2001. Radiosity methods driven by human perception. PhD thesis, Institute of Computer Graphics and Algorithms, Vienna University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramasubramanian, M., Pattanaik, S. N., and Greenberg, D. P. 1999. A perceptually based physical error metric for realistic image synthesis. In SIGGRAPH '99: Proc. of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, 73--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rushmeier, H. 1994. Rendering participating media: Problems and solutions from application areas. In Proc. of the 5th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 117--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Siegel, R., and Howell, J. R. 1992. Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Stokes, W. A., Ferwerda, J. A., Walter, B., and Greenberg, D. P. 2004. Perceptual illumination components: a new approach to efficient, high quality global illumination rendering. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3, 742--749. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Sundstedt, V., Debattista, K., Longhurst, P., Chalmers, A., and Troscianko, T. 2005. Visual attention for efficient high-fidelity graphics. In Spring Conference on Computer Graphics (SCCG 2005), 162--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Yee, H., Pattanaik, S., and Greenberg, D. P. 2001. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. ACM Trans. Graph. 20, 1, 39--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Efficient selective rendering of participating media

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        APGV '06: Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization
        July 2006
        181 pages
        ISBN:1595934294
        DOI:10.1145/1140491

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 July 2006

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate19of33submissions,58%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader