skip to main content
10.1145/1141277.1141284acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

On handling conflicts between rules with numerical features

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 April 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Rule conflicts can arise in machine learning systems that utilise unordered rule sets. A rule conflict is when two or more rules cover the same example but differ in their majority classes. This conflict must be solved before a classification can be made. The standard methods for solving this type of problem are to use naive Bayes to solve the conflict or using the most frequent class (CN2). This paper studies the problem of rule conflicts in the area of numerical features. A novel family of methods, called distance based methods, for solving rule conflicts in continuous domains is presented. An empirical evaluation between a distance based method, CN2 and naive Bayes is made. It is shown that the distance based method significantly outperforms both naive Bayes and CN2.

References

  1. P. Clark and R. Boswell. Rule induction with CN2: Some recent improvements. In Proceedings of the Fifth European Working Session on Learning, pages 151--163, Berlin, 1991. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. Clark and T. Niblett. The CN2 Induction Algorithm. Machine Learning, 3, 261--283, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. James Dougherty, Ron Kohavi, and Mehran Sahami. Supervised and unsupervised discretization of continuous features. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 194--202, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Tom Fawcett. Using rule sets to maximize roc performance. In ICDM, pages 131--138, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. U. M. Fayyad and K. B. Irani. On the handling of continuous-valued attributes in decision tree generation. Machine Learning, 8:87--102, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Fürnkranz and G. Widmer. Incremental Reduced Error Pruning. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Machine Learning, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Johannes Fürnkranz. Separate-and-Conquer Rule Learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Kohavi, B. Becker, and D. Sommerfield. Improving simple Bayes. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. T. Lindgren and H. Boström. Resolving rule conflicts with double induction. Intelligent Data Analysis - An International Journal, Volume 8, Number 5, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Tony Lindgren. Methods for Rule Conflict Resolution. In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML-04), pages 262--273. Springer, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tony Lindgren and Henrik Boström. Classification with Intersecting Rules. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory (ALT'02), pages 395--402. Springer, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Huan Liu, Farhad Hussain, Chew Lim Tan, and Manoranjan Dash. Discretization: An enabling technique. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 6(4):393--423, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. R. Quinlan. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1:81--106, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. RDS. Rule Discovery System (RDS) --- 1.0, Compumine AB, 2003. www.compumine.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On handling conflicts between rules with numerical features

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAC '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing
      April 2006
      1967 pages
      ISBN:1595931082
      DOI:10.1145/1141277

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 April 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader