skip to main content
10.1145/1141277.1141548acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A benchmark on soap's transport protocols performance for mobile applications

Published:23 April 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Handheld mobile devices with wireless capability are gaining popularity. SOAP is a text-based protocol for Web services, but it has high overhead and its suitability for resource-constrained devices over wireless networks needs to be reevaluated. SOAP uses HTTP; HTTP in turn uses TCP as the underlying transport protocol for transmitting messages. However, TCP has a high overhead and high network latency. In this paper, a benchmark of the performance of different underlying transport protocols for SOAP is reported. We show that SOAP-over-HTTP and SOAP-over-TCP are inefficient and lead to high latency and transmission overhead for wireless networks. The results also show that SOAP-over-UDP provides much higher throughput compared to SOAP-over-HTTP.

References

  1. Apache Software Foundation, Web Services - Axis. http://ws.apache.org/axis/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, L. and Nath, R. A Framework for Mobile Business Applications. International Journal of Mobile Communications, Vol. 2, No.4, pp.368--381. 2004. http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?mainAction=search&action=record&rec_id=5857. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chiu, K., Govindaraju, M., and Bramley, R. Investigating the Limits of SOAP Performance for Scientific Computing. In Proceedings of 11th. IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing HPDC-11 2002 (HPDC'02). Edinburgh, Scotland, p. 246--254:IEEE, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Davis, D. and Parashar, M. Latency Performance of SOAP Implementations. In Proceedings of IEEE Cluster Computing and the GRID 2002. Berlin, Germany, IEEE, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Davis, A., Zhang, D. A Comparative Study of DCOM and SOAP. In Proceedings of the IEEE Fourth International Symposium on Multimedia Software Engineering. IEEE, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Devaram, K., Andresen, D. SOAP Optimization via Client-side Caching. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, 439--312. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Enhydra: An open source SOAP for the kVM. http://ksoap.objectweb.org, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferris, C. and Williams, S. SOAP Underlying Protocol Binding. W3C. 2001. http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/12/Binding_Framework_Proposal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gebauer, J., Shaw, M. Success Factors and Impacts of Mobile Business Applications: Results from a Mobile e-Procurement Study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 8, No. 3 (2004), 19--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gehlen, G., Bergs, R. Performance of mobile Web Service Access using the Wireless Application Protocol (WAP). In Proceedings of World Wireless Congress. Sanfransico, USA, 2004. http://www.comnets.rwthaachen.de/207+M57d37c0ef02.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gryazin, E., Seppala, O. SOAP and CORBA Productivity Comparison for Resource-Limited Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the International Conference Software Engineering, February 17--19, 2004. Innsbruck, Austria. http://www.cs.hut.fi/~gryazin/418--809.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kohlhoff C. and Steele R. Evaluating SOAP of High Performance Business Applications: Real- Time Trading Systems. In Proceedings of WWW2003, Budapest Hungry, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. BEA Systems Inc., Lexmark, Microsoft Corporation, Inc and Ricoh. SOAP-Over-UDP Specification. Technical Report. September, 2004 http://ftpna2.bea.com/pub/downloads/SOAPover-UDP.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Microsoft Corporation, Inc. Web Service Enhancement. http://msdn.microsoft.com/webservices/building/wse/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Microsoft Corporation, Inc. Understanding Web services. 2005. http://msdn.microsoft.com/webservices/understanding/default.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ng, A., Chen, S., Greenfield, P. An Evaluation of Contemporary Commercial SOAP Implementations. Technical Report. Department of Computing, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sun Microsystems Inc., 2004, Web Services Performance-Comparing Java 2 Enterprise Edition and .NET Framework. http://java.sun.com/performance/reference/whitepapers/WS_Test-1_0.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. V. Bansal and A. Dalton. A performance analysis of web services on wireless PDA. http://www.cs.duke.edu/vkb/advnw/project/PDAWebServices.pdf, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tian, M., Voigt, T., Naumowicz, T., Ritter, H. and Schiller, J. Performance considerations for mobile web services. In IEEE Communication Society Workshop on Applications and Services in Wiresless Networks, July 2003. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/577608.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A benchmark on soap's transport protocols performance for mobile applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAC '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing
      April 2006
      1967 pages
      ISBN:1595931082
      DOI:10.1145/1141277

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 April 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader