skip to main content
10.1145/1141277.1141677acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A dissimilarity measure for ALC concept descriptions

Published:23 April 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

This work presents a dissimilarity measure for Description Logics that are the theoretical counterpart of the standard representations for ontological knowledge. The focus is on the definition of a dissimilarity measure for ALC concept descriptions, based both on the syntax and on the semantics of the descriptions. An extension of the measure is proposed for involving individuals and then for evaluating their dissimilarity.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., and Patel-Schneider, P., Eds. The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bacchus, F. Lp, a logic for representing and reasoning with statistical knowledge. Computational Intelligence 6 (1990), 209--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bock., H. Analysis of Symbolic Data: Exploratory Methods for Extracting Statistical Information from Complex Data. Springer-Verlag, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Borgida, A., Walsh, T., and Hirsh, H. Towards measuring similarity in description logics. In Working Notes of the International Description Logics Workshop (Edinburgh, UK, 2005), CEUR Workshop Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bright, M. W., Hurson, A. R., and Pakzad, S. H. Automated resolution of semantic heterogeneity in multidatabases. ACM Transaction on Database Systems 19, 2 (1994), 212--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cohen, W., and Hirsh, H. Learning the CLASSIC description logic. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (1994), P. Torasso, J. Doyle, and E. Sandewall, Eds., Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 121--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. d'Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., and Esposito, F. A semantic similarity measure for expressive description logics. In Proceedings of Convegno Italiano di Logica Computazionale (CILC05) (Rome, Italy, 2005), A. Pettorossi, Ed.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Donini, F. M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., and Schaerf, A. Deduction in concept languages: From subsumption to instance checking. Journal of Logic and Computation 4, 4 (1994), 423--452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Mantay, T. Commonality-based ABox retrieval. Tech. Rep. FBI-HH-M-291/2000, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Hamburg, Germany, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Resnik, P. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11 (1999), 95--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rodriguez, A. Assessing semantic similarity between spatial entity classes. PhD thesis, University of Maine, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Rodríguez, M., and Egenhofer, M. Determining semantic similarity among entity classes from different ontologies. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15, 2 (2003), 442--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Schmidt-Schauss, M., and Smolka, G. Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence 48, 1 (1991), 1--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Shvaiko, P., and Euzenat, J. A survey of schema-based matching approaches. Journal on Data Semantics IV (2005), 146--171. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tversky, A. Features od similarity. Psycological Review 84, 4 (1997), 327--352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Weinstein, P., and Bimingham, P. Comparing concepts in differentiated ontologies. In Proceedings of 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modelling, Management (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A dissimilarity measure for ALC concept descriptions

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SAC '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing
            April 2006
            1967 pages
            ISBN:1595931082
            DOI:10.1145/1141277

            Copyright © 2006 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 April 2006

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader