Federico Barbagli
Abstract
Despite a wealth of literature on discrimination thresholds for displacement, force magnitude, stiffness, and viscosity, there is currently a lack of data on our ability to discriminate force directions. Such data are needed in designing haptic rendering algorithms where force direction, as well as force magnitude, are used to encode information such as surface topography. Given that haptic information is typically presented in addition to visual information in a data perceptualization system, it is also important to investigate the extent to which the congruency of visual information affects force-direction discrimination. In this article, the authors report an experiment on the discrimination threshold of force directions under the three display conditions of haptics alone (H), haptics plus congruent vision (HVcong), and haptics plus incongruent vision (HVincong). Average force-direction discrimination thresholds were found to be 18.4°, 25.6°, and 31.9° for the HVcong, H and HVincong conditions, respectively. The results show that the congruency of visual information significantly affected haptic discrimination of force directions, and that the force-direction discrimination thresholds did not seem to depend on the reference force direction. The implications of the results for designing haptic virtual environments, especially when the numbers of sensors and actuators in a haptic display do not match, are discussed.
- Armstrong, L. and Marks, L. E. 1999. Haptic perception of linear extent. Perception Psychophys. 61, 1211--1226.Google Scholar
- Barbagli, F. and Salisbury, K. 2003. The effect of sensor/actuator asymmetries in haptic interfaces. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. 140--147. Google Scholar
- Brisben, A. J., Hsiao, S. S., and Johnson, K. O. 1999. Detection of vibration transmitted through an object grasped in the hand. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 1548--1558.Google Scholar
- Calvert, G., Spence, C., and Stein, B. E. (Eds.) 2004. The Handbook of Multisensory Processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Clark, F. J. 1992. How accurately can we perceive the position of our limbs? Behavioral Brain Sci. 15, 725--726.Google Scholar
- Clark, F. J., Burgess, R. C., and Chapin, J. W. 1986. Proprioception with the proximal interphalangeal joint of the index finger: Evidence for a movement sense without a static-position sense. Brain 109, 1195--1208.Google Scholar
- DiFranco, D. E., Beauregard, G. L., and Srinivasan, M. A. 1997. The effect of auditory cues on the haptic perception of stiffness in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, DSC-Vol. 61, 17--22.Google Scholar
- Durfee, W. K., Hendrix, C. M., Cheng, P., and Varughese, G. 1997. Influence of haptic and visual displays on the estimation of virtual environment stiffness. In Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, DSC-Vol. 61, 139--144.Google Scholar
- Durlach, N. I., Delhorne, L. A., Wong, A., Ko, W. Y., Rabinowitz, W. M., and Hollerbach, J. 1989. Manual discrimination and identification of length by the finger-span method. Perception Psychophys. 46, 29--38.Google Scholar
- Ernst, M. O. and Banks, M. S. 2002. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature (London) 415, 429--433.Google Scholar
- Guest, S. and Spence, C. 2003. What role does multisensory integration play in the visuotactile perception of textute? Int. J. Psychophysiol. 50, 63--80.Google Scholar
- Hayward, V. and Astley, O. R. 1996. Performance measures for haptic interfaces. In Robotics Research: The 7th International Symposium. G. Giralt and G. Hirzinger, Eds. Springer Verlag, New York, 195--207.Google Scholar
- Heller, M. A., Calcaterra, J. A., Green, S. L., and Brown, L. 1999. Intersensory conflict between vision and touch: The response modality dominates when precise, attention-riveting judgments are required. Perception Psychophys. 61, 1384--1398.Google Scholar
- Hendrix, C. M., Cheng, P.-M., and Durfee, W. K. 1999. Relative influence of sensory cues in a multi-modal virtual environment, In Proceedings the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, Vol. DSC-Vol. 67. ASME, 59--64.Google Scholar
- Hillis, J. M., Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S., and Landy, M. S. 2002. Combining sensory information: Mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses, Science 298, 1627--1630.Google Scholar
- Jones, L. A. 1989. Matching forces: Constant errors and differential thresholds. Perception 18, 681--687.Google Scholar
- Jones, L. A. and Hunter, I. W. 1990. A perceptual analysis of stiffness. Experimental Brain Res. 79, 150--156.Google Scholar
- Jones, L. A. and Hunter, I. W. 1992. Differential thresholds for limb movement measured using adaptive techniques. Perception Psychophys. 52, 529--535.Google Scholar
- Jones, L. A. and Hunter, I. W. 1993. A perceptual analysis of viscosity. Experimental Brain Res. 94, 343--351.Google Scholar
- Klein, R. M. 1977. Attention and visual dominance: A chronometric analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Perception Performance 3, 365--378.Google Scholar
- Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S., and Reed, C. 1987. There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. J. Exp. Psychol. General, 116, 356--369.Google Scholar
- Lawrence, D. A., Pao, L. Y., Dougherty, A. M., Salada, M. A., and Pavlou, Y. 2000. Rate-hardness: A new performance metric for haptic interface. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 16, 357--371.Google Scholar
- Lederman, S. J. and Klatzky, R. L. 2004. Multisensory texture perception. In The Handbook of Multisensory Processes, G. A. Calvert, C. Spence, and B. E. Stein, Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 107--122.Google Scholar
- Lederman, S. J., Thorne, G., and Jones, B. 1986. Perception of texture by vision and touch: Multidimensionality and intersensory integration. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Perception Performance 12, 169--180.Google Scholar
- Levitt, H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoustical Soc. Am. 49, 467--477.Google Scholar
- O'Malley, M. and Goldfarb, M. 2002. The implications of surface stiffness for size identification and perceived surface hardness in haptic interfaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 1255--1260.Google Scholar
- Otaduy, M. A. and Lin, M. C. 2003. Sensation preserving simplification for haptic rendering. ACM Trans. Graphics 22, 543--553. Google Scholar
- Pang, X. D., Tan, H. Z., and Durlach, N. I. 1991. Manual discrimination of force using active finger motion. Perception Psychophys. 49, 531--540.Google Scholar
- Robles-De-La-Torre, G. and Hayward, V. 2001. Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature (London) 412, 445--448.Google Scholar
- Rock, I. and Victor, J. 1964. Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the senses. Science 143, 594--596.Google Scholar
- Roder, B., Rosler, F., and Spence, C. 2004. Early vision impairs tactile perception in the blind. Curr. Biol. 14, 121--124.Google Scholar
- Soto-Faraco, S., Spence, C., Fairbank, K., Kingstone, A., Hillstrom, A. P., and Shapiro, K. 2002. A crossmodal attentional blink between vision and touch. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 9, 731--738.Google Scholar
- Spence, C. and Driver, J. Eds. 2004. Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Spence, C. and Driver, J. 1997. Cross-modal links in attention between audition, vision, and touch: Implications for interface design. Int. J. Cognitive Ergonomics 1, 351--373.Google Scholar
- Spence, C., Pavani, F., and Driver, J. 2000. Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Perception Performance 26, 1298--1319.Google Scholar
- Srinivasan, M. A., Beauregard, G. L., and Brock, D. L. 1996. The impact of visual information on the haptic perception of stiffness in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, K. Danai, Ed., Vol. 58. Atlanta, GA: ASME, 555--559.Google Scholar
- Tan, H. Z., Durlach, N. I., Beauregard, G. L., and Srinivasan, M. A. 1995. Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: The roles of force and work cues. Perception Psychophys. 57, 495--510.Google Scholar
- Van Beers, R. J., Wolpert, D. M., and Haggard, P. 2002. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr. Biol. 12, 834--837.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Haptic discrimination of force direction and the influence of visual information
Recommendations
Anisotropy in the Haptic Perception of Force Direction and Magnitude
Although force-feedback devices are already being used, the human ability to perceive forces has not been documented thoroughly. The haptic perception of force direction and magnitude has mostly been studied in discrimination tasks in the direction of ...
The Effects of Hand Motion on Haptic Perception of Force Direction
EuroHaptics '08: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Haptics: Perception, Devices and ScenariosMost studies on the haptic perception of force direction have been conducted without hand movements, whereas hand movements are normally required in real-world applications. This paper reports a study on the perception of haptic force direction during ...
The Influence of Different Haptic Environments on Time Delay Discrimination in Force Feedback
Proceedings, Part I, of the International Conference on Haptics: Generating and Perceiving Tangible Sensations - Volume 6191Time delay in haptic telepresence arising from compression or communication alters the phase characteristics of the environment impedance. This paper describes how well a human operator can discriminate these changes in haptic environments. Three ...
Comments