skip to main content
10.1145/1143997.1144080acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Hierarchically organised evolution strategies on the parabolic ridge

Published:08 July 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Organising evolution strategies hierarchically has been proposed as a means for adapting strategy parameters such as step lengths. Experimental research has shown that on ridge functions, hierarchically organised strategies can significantly outperform strategies that rely on mutative self-adaptation. This paper presents a first theoretical analysis of the behaviour of a hierarchically organised evolution strategy. Quantitative results are derived for the parabolic ridge that describe the dependence on the length of the isolation periods of the mutation strength and the progress rate. The issue of choosing an appropriate length of the isolation periods is discussed and comparisons with recent results for cumulative step length adaptation are drawn.

References

  1. D. V. Arnold and H.-G. Beyer. Performance analysis of evolutionary optimization with cumulative step length adaptation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(4):617--622, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D. V. Arnold and H.-G. Beyer. Evolution strategies with cumulative step length adaptation on the noisy parabolic ridge. Technical Report CS-2006-02, Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, 2006. Available at http://www.cs.dal.ca/research/techreports/2006/CS-2006-02.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. H.-G. Beyer. Toward a theory of evolution strategies: Self-adaptation. Evolutionary Computation, 3(3):311--347, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H.-G. Beyer. On the performance of (1,λ)-evolution strategies for the ridge function class. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 5(3):218--235, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. H.-G. Beyer and H.-P. Schwefel. Evolution strategies - A comprehensive introduction. Natural Computing, 1(1):3--52, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier. Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evolutionary Computation, 9(2):159--195, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Herdy. Reproductive isolation as strategy parameter in hierarchically organized evolution strategies. In R. Männer and B. Manderick, editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN II, pages 207--217. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Herdy. The number of offspring as strategy parameter in hierarchically organized evolution strategies. ACM SIGBIO Newsletter, 13(2):2--9, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Ostermeier, A. Gawelczyk, and N. Hansen. Step-size adaptation based on non-local use of selection information. In Y. Davidor et al., editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN III, pages 189--198. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. I. Oyman and H.-G. Beyer. Analysis of the (μ/μλλ)-ES on the parabolic ridge. Evolutionary Computation, 8(3):267--289, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. I. Oyman, H.-G. Beyer, and H.-P. Schwefel. Where elitists start limping: Evolution strategies at ridge functions. In A. E. Eiben et al., editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN V, pages 109--118. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. I. Oyman, H.-G. Beyer, and H.-P. Schwefel. Analysis of the (1,λ)-ES on the parabolic ridge. Evolutionary Computation, 8(3):249--265, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. I. Rechenberg. Evolutionsstrategie - Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution. Friedrich Frommann Verlag, Stuttgart, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. I. Rechenberg. Evolutionsstrategien. In B. Schneider and U. Ranft, editors, Simulationsmethoden in der Medizin und Biologie, pages 83--114. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. I. Rechenberg. Evolutionsstrategie '94. Friedrich Frommann Verlag, Stuttgart, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. H.-P. Schwefel. Numerical Optimization of Computer Models. Wiley, Chichester, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Whitley, M. Lunacek, and J. Knight. Ruffled by ridges: How evolutionary algorithms can fail. In K. Deb et al., editors, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation - GECCO 2004, pages 294--306. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Hierarchically organised evolution strategies on the parabolic ridge

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Conferences
                    GECCO '06: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
                    July 2006
                    2004 pages
                    ISBN:1595931864
                    DOI:10.1145/1143997

                    Copyright © 2006 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 8 July 2006

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • Article

                    Acceptance Rates

                    GECCO '06 Paper Acceptance Rate205of446submissions,46%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

                    Upcoming Conference

                    GECCO '24
                    Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
                    July 14 - 18, 2024
                    Melbourne , VIC , Australia

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader