skip to main content
10.1145/1159913.1159938acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

The impact and implications of the growth in residential user-to-user traffic

Published: 11 August 2006 Publication History

Abstract

It has been reported worldwide that peer-to-peer traffic is taking up a significant portion of backbone networks. In particular, it is prominent in Japan because of the high penetration rate of fiber-based broadband access. In this paper, we first report aggregated traffic measurements collected over 21 months from seven ISPs covering 42% of the Japanese backbone traffic. The backbone is dominated by symmetric residential traffic which increased 37%in 2005. We further investigate residential per-customer trafficc in one of the ISPs by comparing DSL and fiber users, heavy-hitters and normal users, and geographic traffic matrices. The results reveal that a small segment of users dictate the overall behavior; 4% of heavy-hitters account for 75% of the inbound volume, and the fiber users account for 86%of the inbound volume. About 63%of the total residential volume is user-to-user traffic. The dominant applications exhibit poor locality and communicate with a wide range and number of peers. The distribution of heavy-hitters is heavy-tailed without a clear boundary between heavy-hitters and normal users, which suggests that users start playing with peer-to-peer applications, become heavy-hitters, and eventually shift from DSL to fiber. We provide conclusive empirical evidence from a large and diverse set of commercial backbone data that the emergence of new attractive applications has drastically affected traffic usage and capacity engineering requirements.

References

[1]
Australian Bureau of Statistics: Internet Activity, Australia, Mar 2005. http://www.abs.gov.au/.
[2]
Cisco Sampled NetFlow. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newf%t/120limit/120s/120s11/12s_sanf.htm.
[3]
K. Claffy, G. Polyzos, and H. Braun. Traffic characteristics of the T1 NSFNET backbone. In INFOCOM '93, pages 885--892, San Francisco, CA, Mar. 1993.
[4]
A. Feldmann, A. G. Greenberg, C. Lund, N. Reingold, J. Rexford, and F. True. Deriving traffic demands for operational IP networks:methodology and experience. In SIGCOMM, pages 257--270, Stockholm, Sweden, Aug. 2000.
[5]
C. Fraleigh, S. Moon, B. Lyles, C. Cotton, M. Khan, D. Moll, R. Rockell, T. Seely, and C. Diot. Packet-Level Traffic Measurements from the Sprint IP Backbone. IEEE Network 17(6):6--16, Nov. 2003.
[6]
K. Fukuda, K. Cho, and H. Esaki. The impact of residential broadband traffic on Japanese ISP backbones. SIGCOMM CCR, 35(1):15--21, Jan. 2005.
[7]
K. P. Gummadi, R. J. Dunn, S. Saroiu, S. D. Gribble, H. M. Levy, and J. Zahorjan. Measurement, modeling, and analysis of a peer-to-peer file-sharing workload. In SOSP-19, pages 314--329, Bolton Landing, NY, Oct. 2003.
[8]
L. Guo, S. Chen, Z. Xiao, E. Tan, X. Ding, and X. Zhang. Measurements, analysis, and modeling of bittorrent-like systems. In IMC2005, pages 35--48, Berkeley, CA, Oct. 2005.
[9]
Hong Kong OFTA: Statistics of Internet Traffic Volume. http://www.ofta.gov.hk/en/tele-lic/operator-licensees/opr-isp/s2.html.
[10]
M. Izal, G. Urvoy-Keller, E. W. Biersack, P. A. Felber, A. A. Hamra, and L. Garces-Erice. Dissecting bittorrent:Five months in a torrent's lifetime. In PAM2004 (LNCS3015), pages 1--11, Antibes Juan-les-Pins, France, Apr. 2004.
[11]
Japan Internet Exchange Co., Ltd. http://www.jpix.co.jp.
[12]
Multifeed JPNAP service. http://www.jpnap.net.
[13]
I. Kaneko. The Technology of Winny (In Japanese). ASCII, Tokyo, Japan, 2005.
[14]
T. Karagiannis, A. Broido, N. Brownlee, kc claffy, and M. Faloutsos. Is p2p dying or just hiding?In Globecom 2004, pages 1532--538, Dallas, TX, Dec. 2004.
[15]
T. Karagiannis, P. Rodriguez, and D. Papagiannaki. Should Internet service providers fear peer-assisted content distribution?In IMC2005, pages 63--76, Berkeley, CA, Oct. 2005.
[16]
A. Klemm, C. Lindemann, M. K. Vernon, and O. P. Waldhorst. Characterizing the query behavior in peer-to-peer file sharing systems. In IMC2004, pages 55--67, Sicily, Italy, Oct. 2004.
[17]
L. Lessig. The future of ideas. Random House, 2001.
[18]
NSPIXP. http://nspixp.wide.ad.jp.
[19]
A. M. Odlyzko. Internet traffic growth: Sources and implications. In Optical Transmission Systems and Equipment for WDM Networking II, pages 1--15, San Jose, CA, Jan. 2003.
[20]
OECD Broadband Statistics, December 2005. http://oecd.org/sti/ict/broadband.
[21]
T. Oetiker. RRDtool: Round Robin Database Tool. http://ee-sta~ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/rrdtool/.
[22]
T. Oetiker. MRTG: The multi router traffic grapher. In USENIX LISA, pages 141--147, Boston, MA, Dec. 1998.
[23]
V. Paxson. Growth trends in wide-area TCP connections. IEEE Network, 8(4):8--17, July 1994.
[24]
L. Plissonneau, J.-L. Costeux, and P. Brown. Analysis of peer-to-peer traffic on ADSL. In PAM2005 (LNCS3431), pages 69--82, Boston, MA, Mar. 2005.
[25]
M. Roughan, A. Greenberg, C. Kalmanek, M. Rumsewicz, J. Yates, and Y. Zhang. Experience in measuring Internet backbone traffic variability:Models, metrics, measurements and meaning. In International Teletraffic Congress 18, 2003.
[26]
S. Saroiu, P. K. Gummadi, and S. D. Gribble. A measurement study of peer-to-peer file sharing systems. In MMCN '02, pages 156--170, San Jose, CA, Jan. 2002.
[27]
S. Sen and J. Wang. Analyzing peer-to-peer traffic across large networks. In IMW, pp. 137--150, Marseille, France, Nov. 2002.
[28]
D. Stutzbach, R. Rejaie, and S. Sen. Characterizing unstructured overlay topologies in modern p2p file-share systems. In IMC2005, pages 49--62, Berkeley, CA, Oct. 2005.
[29]
Statistical Outlook of the Internet in Japan (in Japanese). The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, 2005.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The impact and implications of the growth in residential user-to-user traffic

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGCOMM '06: Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
    September 2006
    458 pages
    ISBN:1595933085
    DOI:10.1145/1159913
    • cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
      ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 36, Issue 4
      Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
      October 2006
      445 pages
      ISSN:0146-4833
      DOI:10.1145/1151659
      Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 August 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. ISP backbone traffic
    2. residential broadband
    3. traffic growth

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    SIGCOMM06
    Sponsor:
    SIGCOMM06: ACM SIGCOMM 2006 Conference
    September 11 - 15, 2006
    Pisa, Italy

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 462 of 3,389 submissions, 14%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)121
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Research Frontiers of Network Behavior AnalysisNetwork Behavior Analysis10.1007/978-981-16-8325-1_8(119-163)Online publication date: 16-Dec-2021
    • (2019)GAMPAL: Anomaly Detection for Internet Backbone Traffic by Flow Prediction with LSTM-RNNMachine Learning for Networking10.1007/978-3-030-45778-5_13(196-211)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2019
    • (2016)Charactering network latency in ChinaJournal of High Speed Networks10.3233/JHS-16054722:4(253-264)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016
    • (2016)Cache Replacement Based on Distance to Origin ServersIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2016.260024013:4(848-859)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016
    • (2016)A Case Study of Traffic Demand Response to Broadband Service-Plan UpgradesPassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-319-30505-9_10(124-135)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2016
    • (2016)Secure the Internet, one home at a timeSecurity and Communication Networks10.1002/sec.15699:16(3821-3832)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2016
    • (2016)Insights into the issue in IPv6 adoptionConcurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience10.1002/cpe.332728:3(616-630)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2016
    • (2014)Need, Want, Can AffordProceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/2663716.2663753(73-86)Online publication date: 5-Nov-2014
    • (2014)Using tuangou to reduce IP transit costsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2013.227823622:5(1415-1428)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014
    • (2014)Characterizing home network trafficPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/s00779-013-0711-x18:4(967-975)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2014
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media