Cited By
View all- Murukannaiah PAjmeri NSingh M(2016)Engineering Privacy in Social ApplicationsIEEE Internet Computing10.1109/MIC.2016.3020:2(72-76)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016
An ontology of social control tools
Pages 1369 - 1371
Abstract
In multi-agent systems, social commitments are increasingly used to capture roles, social norms, the semantics of agent communication as well as other inter-agent dependencies. Those systems rest on the assumption that agents respect their commitments. In this paper, we present an ontology of sanctions and punishment philosophies which are required ingredients of any social control mechanism susceptible to fosters agents' compliance with the commitments they create.
References
[1]
J. Bates. The role of emotion in believable agents. Communications of the ACM, 37(7):122--125, July 1994.
[2]
C. Beccaria. On Crimes and Punishments. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1963.
[3]
J. Bentham. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: The Athlone Press, 1970.
[4]
M. Hechter and K. D. Opp. Introduction. In M. Hechter and K. D. Opp, editors, Social Norms, pages xi--xx. Russell Sage Foundation, 2001.
[5]
C. Hewitt. Open information systems semantics for distributed artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 47:76--106, 1991.
[6]
D. J. Levinson. Collective sanctions. Public law research paper no. 57, New York University, School of Law, Center for Law and Business Research, 2003.
[7]
D. Martindale. Social Control for the 1980s: A Handbook for Order in a Democratic Society, chapter The theory of social control, pages 46--58. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1978.
[8]
M. A. Polinsky and S. Shavel. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and The Law, volume 3, chapter Punitive Damages, pages 192--198. London: Macmillan Reference Limited, 1998.
[9]
R. A. Posner and E. B. Rasmusen. Creating and enforcing norms, with special reference to sanctions. International Review of Law and Economics, 19(3):369--382, 1999.
[10]
G. B. Vold, T. J. Bernard, and J. B. Snipes. Theoretical Criminology. Oxford University Press, 5 th edition, 2002.
Index Terms
- An ontology of social control tools
Recommendations
The 5C categorization of social media tools
AcademicMindtrek '16: Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek ConferenceSocial media can offer potential business benefits in the company context. However, successful social media initiative calls for careful strategic planning and approaching social media tools as enablers for reaching a purpose. A categorization of social ...
Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital
Applying uses and gratifications theory (UGT) and social capital theory, our study examined users of four social networking sites (SNSs) (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat), and their influence on online bridging and bonding social capital. ...
Social Ontology and Semantic Actions: Enabling Social Networking Services for Distributed Web Tasking
SERVICES '13: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Ninth World Congress on ServicesEnd-users are confined by the social networking platforms that they invest effort in to set up their social contacts and relationships. The centralized, monopolized, and silo approach of today's social networking providers discourage interoperability ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2006
1631 pages
ISBN:1595933034
DOI:10.1145/1160633
- General Chairs:
- Hideyuki Nakashima,
- Michael Wellman,
- Program Chairs:
- Gerhard Weiss,
- Peter Stone
Copyright © 2006 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
- IFMAS: The International Foundation for Multiagent Systems
- SIGAI: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
- ATAL: The International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 08 May 2006
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Article
Conference
AAMAS06
Sponsor:
- IFMAS
- SIGAI
- ATAL
AAMAS06: AAMAS '06 - 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems 2006
May 8 - 12, 2006
Japan, Hakodate
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 294Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)1
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Murukannaiah PAjmeri NSingh M(2016)Engineering Privacy in Social ApplicationsIEEE Internet Computing10.1109/MIC.2016.3020:2(72-76)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in