skip to main content
article

Moral intensity and ethical decision-making: a contextual extension

Published: 19 September 2006 Publication History

Abstract

This paper explores the role of an individual's perception of situation-specific issues on decision-making in ethical situations. It does so by examining the influence of moral intensity on a person's perceptions of an ethical problem, and subsequent intentions. Moral intensity (Jones, 1991) is an issue-contingent model of ethical decision-making based on the supposition that situations vary in terms of the moral imperative present in that situation. An individual's decision is guided by his or her assessment of six different components that collectively comprise the moral intensity of the situation. The relationship between the components of moral intensity and the decision-making process is tested through the use of scenarios that present IS-related ethical situations. The results indicate that moral intensity plays a significant role in shaping the perceptions and intentions of individuals faced with IS-related ethical situations. The conclusion drawn from this is that, consistent with prior research, the decision-making process is influenced by an individual's perception of situation-specific issues; that is, the moral intensity of the situation.

References

[1]
Athey, S. (1993). "Comparison of Experts' and High Tech Students' Ethical Beliefs in Computer Related Situations," Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.12, No.5, pp. 359--370.
[2]
Banerjee, D., Cronan, T., and Jones, T. (1998). "Modeling IT Ethics: A Study in Situational Ethics," MIS Quarterly, Vol.22, No.1, pp. 31--60.
[3]
Cappel, J. and Windsor, J. (1998). "A Comparative Investigation of Ethical Decision Making: Information Systems Professionals versus Students," The Database for Advances in Information Systems, Vol.29, No.2, pp. 20--34.
[4]
Cheng, H., Sims, R., and Teegen, H. (1997). "To Purchase or Pirate Software: An Empirical Study," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.13, No.4, pp. 49--60.
[5]
Chia, A. and Mee, L. (2000). "The Effects of Issue Characteristics on the Recognition of Moral Issues," Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.27, No.3, pp. 255--269.
[6]
Chin, W.W. (1998a). "Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling," MIS Quarterly, Vol.22, No.1, pp. vii--xvi.
[7]
Chin, W.W. (1998b). "The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling," in Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 295-336.
[8]
Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., and Newsted, P.R. (2003). "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study," Information Systems Research, Vol.14, No.2, pp. 189--217.
[9]
Congor, S. and Loch, K. (2001). "Invitation to a Public Debate on Ethical Computer Use," The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol.32, No.1, pp. 58--69.
[10]
Dubinsky, A. and Loken, B. (1989). "Analyzing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing," Journal of Business Research, Vol.19, No.2, pp. 83-107.
[11]
Ellis, T. and Griffith, D. (2001). "The Evaluation of IT Ethical Scenarios Using a Multidimensional Scale," The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol.32, No.1, pp. 75--85.
[12]
Ferrell, O.C., Gresham, L.G., and Fraedrich, J. (1989). "A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Models for Marketing," Journal of Macro-marketing, Vol.9, No.2, pp. 55--64.
[13]
Ford, R. and Richardson, W. (1994). "Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Journal of Business Ethics Vol.13, No.3, pp. 205--221.
[14]
Frey, B. (2000). "The Impact of Moral Intensity on Decision Making in a Business Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.26, No.3, pp. 181--195.
[15]
Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., and Boudreau, M.C. (2000). "Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice," Commun-ications of the AIS, Vol.4, No.7, pp. 1--77.
[16]
Harrington, S. (1996). "The Effects of Codes of Ethics and Personal Denials of Responsibility on Computer Abuse Judgments and Intentions," MIS Quarterly, Vol.20, 3, pp. 257--278.
[17]
Hunt, S. and Vitell, S. (1986). "A General Theory of Marketing Ethics," Journal of Macromarketing, Vol.8, No.1, pp. 5--16.
[18]
Jones, T. (1991). "Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model," Academy of Management Review, Vol.16, No.2, pp. 231--248.
[19]
Loe, T., Ferrell, L., and Mansfield, P. (2000). "A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.25, No.3, pp. 185--204.
[20]
Maner, W. (1996). "Unique Ethical Problems in Information Technology," Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol.2, No.2, pp. 137--152.
[21]
Marshall, K.P. (1999). "Has Technology Introduced New Ethical Problems?" Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.19, No.1, pp. 81--90.
[22]
Moor, J.H. (1985). "What Is Computer Ethics?" Metaphilosophy, Vol.16, No.4, pp. 266--275.
[23]
Morris, S. and McDonald, R. (1995). "The Role of Moral Intensity in Moral Judgments: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.14, 9, pp. 715--726.
[24]
Ogburn, W.F. (1966). Social Change with Regard to Cultural and Original Nature, New York: Dell Publishing Co.
[25]
Paolillo, J. and Vitell, S. (2002). "An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Selected Personal, Organizational and Moral Intensity Factors on Ethical Decision Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.35, No.1, pp. 65--74.
[26]
Rubin, R. (1994). "Moral Distancing and the Use of Information Technologies: The Seven Temptations," Proceedings of the ACM Con-ference on Ethics in the Computer Age, Gatlinburg, TN, pp. 151--155.
[27]
Sambamurthy, V. and Chin, W. (1994). "The Effects of Group Attitudes toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision-Making Performance of Computer-Supported Groups," Decision Sciences, Vol.25, No.2, pp. 215--241.
[28]
Sims, R., Cheng, H., and Teegen, H. (1996). "Toward a Profile of Student Software Piraters," Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.15, No.8, pp. 839--849.
[29]
Singer, M. (1996). "The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgments of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public," Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.15, No.4, pp. 459--474.
[30]
Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S., and Kraft, K. (1996). "Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-Making of Marketing Professionals," Journal of Business Research, Vol.36, No.3, pp. 245--255.
[31]
Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S., and Franklin, G.R. (1999). "Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Effects of Perceived Moral Intensity and Personal Moral Philosophies," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.27, No.1, pp. 19--36.
[32]
Straub, D.W., Carlson, P.J., and Jones, E.H. (1993). "Deterring Cheating by Student Programmers: A Field Experiment in Computer Security," Journal of Management Systems, Vol.5, No.1, pp. 33--48.
[33]
Tavani, H.T. (2002). "The Uniqueness Debate in Computer Ethics: What Exactly is at Issue, and Why Does it Matter?" Ethics and Information Technology, Vol.4, No.1, pp. 37--54.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Specifics of military leadershipMegatrend revija10.5937/MegRev2401145B21:1(145-164)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Moral Intensity: It Is What Is, But What Is It? A Critical Review of the LiteratureJournal of Business Ethics10.1007/s10551-024-05869-8Online publication date: 16-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Practitioner Application of Ethics in Ethical Decision-Making Within Projects: A Process Theory ViewProject Management Journal10.1177/8756972823116691754:4(334-348)Online publication date: 10-May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 37, Issue 2-3
Spring-Summer 2006
178 pages
ISSN:0095-0033
EISSN:1532-0936
DOI:10.1145/1161345
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 September 2006
Published in SIGMIS Volume 37, Issue 2-3

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. PLS
  2. ethical decision-making
  3. ethics
  4. intentions
  5. moral intensity
  6. perceived ethical problems

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Specifics of military leadershipMegatrend revija10.5937/MegRev2401145B21:1(145-164)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Moral Intensity: It Is What Is, But What Is It? A Critical Review of the LiteratureJournal of Business Ethics10.1007/s10551-024-05869-8Online publication date: 16-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Practitioner Application of Ethics in Ethical Decision-Making Within Projects: A Process Theory ViewProject Management Journal10.1177/8756972823116691754:4(334-348)Online publication date: 10-May-2023
  • (2023)The impact of work pressure and work completion justification on intentional nonmalicious information security policy violation intentionComputers & Security10.1016/j.cose.2023.103253130(103253)Online publication date: Jul-2023
  • (2021)An Empirical Investigation of Decision Making in IT-Related DilemmasResearch Anthology on Recent Trends, Tools, and Implications of Computer Programming10.4018/978-1-7998-3016-0.ch075(1671-1690)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2019)Information protection behaviors: morality and organizational criticalityInformation and Computer Security10.1108/ICS-07-2018-0092Online publication date: 3-Jun-2019
  • (2019)Misuse of Police Information Systems: Predicting Perceived Likelihood of Misuse among Unsworn Police EmployeesPolicing: A Journal of Policy and Practice10.1093/police/paz034Online publication date: 5-Jul-2019
  • (2019)Bank customers’ decision-making process in choosing between ethical and conventional banking: a survey-based examinationJournal of Business Economics10.1007/s11573-019-00934-589:6(655-697)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2019
  • (2018)Putting the Pieces Back Together: Moral Intensity and Its Impact on the Four‐component Model of MoralityBusiness and Society Review10.1111/basr.12141123:2(243-268)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2018
  • (2018)Anti-money laundering and moral intensity in suspicious activity reportingJournal of Money Laundering Control10.1108/JMLC-09-2017-004821:4(520-533)Online publication date: Oct-2018
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media