skip to main content
10.1145/1165485.1165524acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicailConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The integration of narrative and argumentation for a scenario based learning environment in law

Published:06 June 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Narrative or story telling has long been used to structure and organise human experience. In contrast to logical models of reasoning, narrative models enable complex situations to be understood and recalled by humans readily. There is also some indication that narrative models represent the way in which jurors weigh up the veracity of legal evidence. In this work a narrative model is integrated into a logical reasoning model for the purpose of advancing a learning environment that promises to be engaging and effective. The narrative model includes a representation of the point of a story and a simple story grammar. The learning environment is designed to enable the automated generation of plausible scenarios representing a variety of family law property division cases told from the point of view of numerous characters.

References

  1. Aleven, A., 2003. Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: a computational model and an intelligent learning environment. Artificial Intelligence. Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Vol 150. No. 1--2. Elsevier Science. pp183--237 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bennett, W. L. and Feldman, M. S. 1981. Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture. Rutgers University Press, USA; Methuen-Tavistock, Great Britain,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hall, R., 2002. Towards Using Stories to Analyse Evidence. Workshop on Modelling Evidence and Intelligence Joseph Bell Centre for Forensic Statistics and Legal Reasoning. University of Edinburgh, ScotlandGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Leary, D. 2002. The art of storytelling in police investigations. Workshop on Modelling Evidence and Intelligence Joseph Bell Centre for Forensic Statistics and Legal Reasoning. University of Edinburgh, ScotlandGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Nissan, E, The Jama Legal Narrative. Part II: A Foray into concepts of Improbability. Proceedings of the AISB'00 Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning University of Birmingham, U.K p37--45Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Pennington, N and Hastie, R. 1981. Juror decision-making models: The generalization gap. Psychological Bulletin, 89:246--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Pennington, N and Hastie, R. 1992. Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62:189--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Schank, R, C. 1996. Goal-Based Scenarios: Case-Based Reasoning Meets Learning by Doing, in Leake, David, Eds. Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons & Future Directions, pages pp. 295--347. AAAI Press/The MIT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Yearwood, J., and Stranieri, A., 2005. The Generic Actual Argument Model of Practical Reasoning. To appear in Decision Support Systems Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Wilensky, R., 1982, Points: A Theory of the Structure of Stories in Memory, In Strategies for Natural Language Processing, (eds. W. G. Lehnert and M. H. Ringle), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICAIL '05: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
    June 2005
    270 pages
    ISBN:1595930817
    DOI:10.1145/1165485

    Copyright © 2005 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 6 June 2005

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate69of169submissions,41%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader