skip to main content
10.1145/1165485.1165533acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicailConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A metalogic formalization of legal argumentation as game trees with defeasible reasoning

Published: 06 June 2005 Publication History

Abstract

We outline an approach to logical analysis and formalization of legal argumentation and dispute as game trees, wellknown in AI, using metalogic programming. The argument/counter-argument dialectic is facilitated through defeasible reasoning, and the applied principles are sought demonstrated by unravelling of a legal case within statutory law.

References

[1]
G. Antoniu, D. Billington, G. Governatori and M. J. Maher: A Flexible Framework for Defeasible Logics, Proceedings of the 17th American National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000), 2000.
[2]
G. Antoniu, D. Billington, G. Governatori and M. J. Maher: Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logics, J. Logic Computat., 14/5, 2004.
[3]
C. I. Chesñevar, A. G. Maguitman and R. P. Loui: Logical Models of Argument, ACM Computing Surveys 32/4, 2000.
[4]
H. Prakken, G. Sartor: Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6, 1998.

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)A dynamic metalogic argumentation framework implementationProceedings of the 5th international conference on Rule-based reasoning, programming, and applications10.5555/2032787.2032798(83-98)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2011
  • (2011)A Dynamic Metalogic Argumentation Framework ImplementationRule-Based Reasoning, Programming, and Applications10.1007/978-3-642-22546-8_8(83-98)Online publication date: 2011
  • (2009)An Asymmetric Protocol for Argumentation Games in Defeasible LogicAgent Computing and Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/978-3-642-01639-4_19(219-231)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2009
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICAIL '05: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
June 2005
270 pages
ISBN:1595930817
DOI:10.1145/1165485
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • The International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law
  • CIRSFID

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 June 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

ICAIL05
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 169 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)A dynamic metalogic argumentation framework implementationProceedings of the 5th international conference on Rule-based reasoning, programming, and applications10.5555/2032787.2032798(83-98)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2011
  • (2011)A Dynamic Metalogic Argumentation Framework ImplementationRule-Based Reasoning, Programming, and Applications10.1007/978-3-642-22546-8_8(83-98)Online publication date: 2011
  • (2009)An Asymmetric Protocol for Argumentation Games in Defeasible LogicAgent Computing and Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/978-3-642-01639-4_19(219-231)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2009
  • (2007)Dialogue games in defeasible logicProceedings of the 20th Australian joint conference on Advances in artificial intelligence10.5555/1781238.1781302(497-506)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2007
  • (2007)A rule-sceptic characterization of acceptable legal argumentsProceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law10.1145/1276318.1276372(283-284)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2007
  • (2007)Dialogue Games in Defeasible LogicAI 2007: Advances in Artificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-540-76928-6_51(497-506)Online publication date: 2007
  • (2007)Dialogue Game Tree with Nondeterministic Additive ConsolidationComputational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/978-3-540-69619-3_7(115-133)Online publication date: 2007
  • (2006)Dialogue game tree with nondeterministic additive consolidationProceedings of the 7th international conference on Computational logic in multi-agent systems10.5555/1758663.1758671(115-133)Online publication date: 8-May-2006

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media