skip to main content
10.1145/1182475.1182490acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Interacting with embodied agents that can see: how vision-enabled agents can assist in spatial tasks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 October 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe user experiences with a system equipped with cognitive vision that interacts with the user in the context of personal assistance in the office. A cognitive vision computer can see the user and user responses and react to situations that happen in the environment, crossing the boundary between the virtual and the physical world. How should such a seeing computer interact with its users? Three different interface styles -- a traditional GUI, a cartoon-like embodied agent and a realistic embodied agent -- are tested in two tasks where users are actively observed by a (simulated) cognitive vision system. The system assists them in problem solving. Both the non-embodied and the embodied interaction styles offer the user certain advantages and the pros and cons based on the experiment results are discussed in terms of performance, intelligence, trust, comfort, and social presence.

References

  1. Andre, E., Rist, T., and Muller, J., 1998. Integrating Reactive and Scripted Behaviors in a Life-Like Presentation Agent, Proc. 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents '98), 261--268 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Ball and J. Breese, 2000. Emotion and personality in a conversational agent. In J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, and E. Churchill, Eds., Embodied conversational agents, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 189--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bickmore, T. W., 2003. Relational Agents: Effecting Change through Human-Computer Relationships, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bickmore, T. W. and Picard, R. W., 2005, Establishing and Maintaining Long-Term Human-Computer Relationships, ACM Transactions, 12 (2), 293--327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brennan, S. E. and Ohaeri, J. O., 1994. Effects of Message Style on Users' Attributions toward Agents, Conference Companion Proc. CHI '94, 281--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cole, R., Vuuren, S. v., Pellom, B., Hacioglu, K., Ma, J., Movellan, J., Schwartz, S., Wadestein, D., Ward, W. and Yan, J., 2003. Perceptive Animated Interfaces: First Steps Toward a New Paradigm for Human--Computer Interaction, Proc. IEEE, 91(9), 1391--1405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Cassell, J., 2001. Embodied Conversational Agents, AI Magazine, 22(4), 67--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dahlbäck, N., Jänsson, A. and Ahrenberg, L., 1993. Wizard of Oz Studies - Why and How, Proc. ACM International Workshop on Intelligent User Interfaces '93, 193--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. ECVision, online at http://www.ecvision.org. Last accessed: January 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Furnham, A., 1997. The psychology of behaviour at work, Psychology Press, Publishers, East Sussex, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. de Greef, H. P. and IJsselsteijn, W. A., 2000. Social Presence in the PhotoShare Tele-Application. Proc. PRESENCE 2000, Delft, The NetherlandsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Keirsey Online Temperament Sorter (German), http://www.keirsey.com/ Last accessed: January 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. King, W. J., and Ohya, J., 1995. The representation of agents: a study of phenomena in virtual environments, Proc. RO-MAN'95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Koda, T. and Maes, P., 1996. Agents with Faces: The Effects of Personification of Agents, Proc. HCI '96 UK, 98--103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lanier, J., 1995. Agents of alienation, ACM Interactions, 2 (3), 66--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lee, K. M. and Nass, C., 2003. Designing Social Presence of Social Actors in Human Computer Interaction, Proc. CHI '03, 289--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A. & Bhogal, R. S., 1997. The Persona Effect: Affective Impact of Animated Pedagogical Agents, Proc. CHI '97, 359--366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mori, M., 1970. The Uncanny Valley. Energy, 7, 33--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mori, M., 2005. On the Uncanny Valley. Proc. workshop Humanoids-2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nass, C., Steuer, J. and Tauber, E. R., 1994. Computers are Social Actors, Proc. CHI '94, 72--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Picard, R. W., 1997. Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Power, G., Wills, G. and Hall, W., 2002. User Perception of Anthropomorphic Characters with Varying Levels of Interaction. Proc. HCI '02 UK, 37--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Reeves, B. and Nass, C., 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sas, C., Hare, G. M. P. O., and Reilly, R., 2004. Presence and task performance: an approach in the light of cognitive style, Cognition, Technology & Work, 6 (1), 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Short, J. A., Williams, E., & Christie, B., 1976. The social psychology of telecommunications, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sproull, L., Walker, J., Subramani, R., Kiesler, S., and Waters, K., 1996. When the Interface is a Face, Human Computer Interaction, 11, 97--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Vernon, D., 2004. Cognitive Vision -- The Development of a Discipline, Proc. IST 2004 Event 'Participate in your future'.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Xiao, J., Catrambone, R. and Stasko, J., 2003. Be Quiet? Evaluating Proactive and Reactive User Interface Assistants, Proc. INTERACT 2003, 383--390.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Interacting with embodied agents that can see: how vision-enabled agents can assist in spatial tasks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '06: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles
      October 2006
      517 pages
      ISBN:1595933255
      DOI:10.1145/1182475

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 October 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader