skip to main content
10.1145/1183471.1183499acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Object localization based on directional information case of 2D vector data

Published:10 November 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

If you were told that some object A was perfectly (or somewhat, or not at all) in some direction d (e.g., west, above-right) of some reference object B, where in space would you look for A? Cognitive experiments suggest that you would mentally build a spatial template. Using essentially angular deviation, you would partition the space into regions where the relationship "in direction d of B" holds (to various extents) and regions where it does not hold. You would then be able to locate the objects for which the relationship holds best, and find A. Spatial templates, therefore, represent directional spatial relationships to reference objects (e.g., "east of the post office"). Note that other names can also be found in the literature (e.g., fuzzy landscape, applicability structure, potential field). There exists a very simple and yet cognitively plausible way to mathematically model a spatial template without sacrificing the geometry of the reference object (i.e., the object is not approximated through its centroid or minimum bounding rectangle). In case of 2D raster data, exact calculation of the model can easily be achieved but is computationally expensive, and tractable approximation algorithms were proposed. In case of 2D vector data, exact calculation of the model is not conceivable. In previous work, we introduced the concept of the F-template. We discussed the case of 2D raster data and designed, based on this concept, an efficient approximation algorithm for spatial template computation. The algorithm is faster, gives better results, and is more flexible than its competitors. Here, comparable advances are presented in the case of 2D vector data. These advances are of particular interest for spatial query processing in Geographic Information Systems.

References

  1. R. Krishnapuram, J.M. Keller, and Y. Ma, "Quantitative Analysis of Properties and Spatial Relations of Fuzzy Image Regions", IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, 1993, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 222--233Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Sharma, and D.M. Flewelling, "Inferences from Combined Knowledge about Topology and Direction", SSD'95 (Advances in Spatial Databases: 42nd Symposium), 1995, Proceedings, pp. 279--291 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Papadias, and Y. Theodoridis, "Spatial Relations, Minimum Bounding Rectangles, and Spatial Data Structures", Int. J. of Geographical Information Science, 1997, vol. 11, pp. 111--138Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. P. Matsakis, and L. Wendling, "A New Way to Represent the Relative Position of Areal Objects", IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1999, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 634--643 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. F. Petry, M. Cobb, D. Ali, R. Angryk, M. Paprzycki, S. Rahimi, L. Wen, and H. Yang, "Fuzzy Spatial Relationships and Mobile Agent Technology in Geospatial Information Systems", in P. Matsakis, and L. Sztandera (Eds.), Applying Soft Computing in Defining Spatial Relations, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Physica-Verlag, 2002, vol. 106, pp. 123--155 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Peuquet, and C.-X. Zhan, "An algorithm to determine the directional relationship between arbitrarily-shaped polygons in a plane", Pattern Recognition, 1987, vol. 20, pp. 65--74 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. K. Goyal, and M. J. Egenhofer, "Similarity of Cardinal Directions", in C. Jensen, M. Schneider, B. Seeger, V. Tsotras (Eds.), Seventh International Symposium on Spatial and Temporal Databases Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2001, vol. 2121, pp. 36--55 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Claramunt, and M. Theriault, "Fuzzy semantics for direction relations between composite regions", Information Science, 2004, pp. 73--90 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. U. Frank, "Qualitative spatial reasoning: Cardinal directions as an example", International Journal of Geographical Information Systems (10) 3, 1996, pp. 269--290Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. I. Bloch, "Fuzzy Relative Position Between Objects in Image Processing: A Morphological Approach", IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1999, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 657--664 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G.D. Logan, and D.D. Sadler, "A Computational Analysis of the Apprehension of Spatial Relations", in P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M.F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K.-P. Gapp, "Basic Meanings of Spatial Relations: Computation and Evaluation in 3D Space", 12th National Conf. on Artificial intelligence, Seattle, Washington, 1994, Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 1393--1398 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Olivier, and J.-I. Tsuji, "Quantitative Perceptual Representation of Prepositional Semantics", in Artificial Intelligence Review (Special Issue on Integration of Natural Language and Vision Processing), 1994, vol. 8, pp. 147--158Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Matsakis, J. Ni, X. Wang, "Object Localization Based on Directional Information: Case of 2D Raster Data", ICPR 2006 (Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition), Hong-Kong, 2006 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Freeman, "The Modeling of Spatial Relations", Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 1975, vol. 4, pp. 156--171Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. K.-P. Gapp, "Angle, Distance, Shape, and Their Relationship to Projective Relations", 17th Annual Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995, Proceedings, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 112--117Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. N. Franklin, L.A. Henkel, and T. Zengas, "Parsing Surrounding Space Into Regions", Memory and Cognition, 1995, vol. 23, pp. 397--407Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. P. Matsakis, Relations Spatiales Structurelles et Interprétation d'images, PhD Thesis, Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse, France, 1998Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Object localization based on directional information case of 2D vector data

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  GIS '06: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems
                  November 2006
                  264 pages
                  ISBN:1595935290
                  DOI:10.1145/1183471

                  Copyright © 2006 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 10 November 2006

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader