skip to main content
10.1145/1183512.1183523acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Designing what-if analysis: towards a methodology

Published:10 November 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to be able to evaluate beforehand the impact of a strategical or tactical move, decision makers need reliable previsional systems. What-ifanalysis satisifies this need by enabling users to simulate and inspect the behavior of a complex system under some given hypotheses, called scenarios. Though a few commercial tools are capable of performing forecasting and what-if analysis, and some papers describe relevant applications in different fields, no attempt has been made so far to comprehensively address methodological and modeling issues in this field. This paper is a preliminary work in the direction of devising a structured approach to designing what-if applications in the BI context. Its goal is to summarize the main lessons we have learnt by facing real what-if projects, and to discuss the related research issues. We also provide a methodological framework for design and discuss its application to a case study.

References

  1. Applix Inc. The TM1 platform: Taking business performance management to a new dimension. http://www.applix.com, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Armstrong and R. Brodie. Forecasting for marketing. In G. Hooley and M. Hussey, editors, Quantitative methods in marketing, pages 92--119. Int. Thompson Business Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Baybutt. Major hazards analysis - an improved process hazard analysis method. Process Safety Progress, 22(1):21--26, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. H.K. Bhargava, R. Krishnan, and R. Müller. Electronic commerce in decision technologies: A business cycle analysis. Int. Jour. of Electronic Commerce, 1(4):109--127, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Chaudhuri and V. Narasayya. Autoadmin what-if index analysis utility. SIGMOD Rec., 27(2):367--378, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Chen, L. Chen, Y. Lin, and R. Ramakrishnan. Prediction cubes. In Int.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R.G. Coyle. System Dynamics Modelling: A Practical Approach. Chapman & Hall, London, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Fischer. Business Planning With SAP SEM. SAP Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J.W. Forrester. Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1961.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. C. Fossett, D. Harrison, and H. Weintrob. An assessment procedure for simulation models: a case study. Operations Research, 39(5):710--723, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Golfarelli, D. Maio, and S. Rizzi. The Dimensional Fact Model: A conceptual model for data warehouses. Int. Jour. of Cooperative Inf. Syst., 7(2-3):215--247, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Kleijnen. Sensitivity analysis and optimization in simulation models: design of experiments and case studies. In Proc. Winter Simulation Conf., 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Kleijnen, S. Sanchez, T. Lucas, and T. Cioppa. State-of-the-art review: A user's guide to the brave new world of designing simulation experiments. INFORMS Jour. on Computing, 17(3):263--289, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Klosterman. The What if? collaborative support system. Environment and Planning, B: Planning and Design, 26:393--408, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. N.-S. Koutsoukis, G. Mitra, and C. Lucas. Adapting on-line analytical processing for decision modelling: the interaction of information and decision technologies. Decis. Support Syst., 26(1):1--30, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. I. Lee and M. Gahegan. What-if analysis for point data sets using generalised Voronoi diagrams. In Proc. Int. Conf. on GeoComputation, Greenwich, UK, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Leonard. Large-scale automatic forecasting with inputs and calendar events. In Proc. Workshop on Temporal Data Mining, San Francisco, US, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. L.F. Luna-Reyes and D.L. Andersen. Collecting and analyzing qualitative data for system dynamics: methods and models. System Dynamics Review, 19(4):271--296, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Natrajan. Consistency Maintenance in Concurrent Representations. PhD thesis, Dep. Computer Science, Univ. of Virginia, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Philippakis. Structured what if analysis in DSS models. In Proc. HICSS, pages 366--370, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. H. Qudrat-Ullah. Structural validation of system dynamics and agent-based simulation models. In Proc. European Conf. on Modelling and Simulation 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. E.B. Roberts. Managerial Applications of System Dynamics. Pegasus Communications, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S.R. Srinivasan, S. Ramakrishnan, and S.E. Grasman. Incorporating cannibalization models into demand forecasting. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 23(5):470--485, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Designing what-if analysis: towards a methodology

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DOLAP '06: Proceedings of the 9th ACM international workshop on Data warehousing and OLAP
        November 2006
        110 pages
        ISBN:1595935304
        DOI:10.1145/1183512

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 November 2006

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate29of79submissions,37%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader