skip to main content
10.1145/1185347.1185354acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesancsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Packet classification using coarse-grained tuple spaces

Published:03 December 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

While the problem of high performance packet classification has received a great deal of attention in recent years, the research community has yet to develop algorithmic methods that can overcome the drawbacks of TCAM-based solutions. This paper introduces a hybrid approach, which partitions the filter set into subsets that are easy to search efficiently. The partitioning strategy groups filters that are close to one another in tuple space [10], which makes it possible to use information from single field lookups to limit the number of subsets that must be searched. We can trade-off running time against space consumption by adjusting the coarseness of the tuple space partition. We find that for two-dimensional filter sets, the method finds the best-matching filter with just four hash probes while limiting the memory space expansion factor to about 2. We also introduce a novel method for Longest Prefix Matching (LPM), which we use as a component of the overall packet classification algorithm. Our LPM method uses a small amount of on-chip memory to speedup the search of an off-chip data structure, but uses significantly less on-chip memory than earlier methods based on Bloom filters.

References

  1. F. Baboescu, S. Singh, and G. Varghese. Packet classification for core routers: Is there an alternative to CAMs? In IEEE INFOCOM 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. Buddhikot, S. Suri, and M. Waldvogel. Space Decomposition Techniques for Fast Layer-4 Switching. In Conference on Protocols for High Speed Networks 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. Cohen and C. Lund. Packet Classification in Large ISPs: Design and Evaluation of Decision Tree Classifiers. In ACM SIGMETRICS/Performance 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Dharmapurikar, P. Krishnamurthy, and D. Taylor. Longest Prefix Matching using Bloom Filters. In ACM SIGCOMM Aug. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. W. Eatherton, G. Varghese, and Z. Dittia. Tree Bitmap: hardware/software IP Lookups with Incremental Updates. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Hasan and T. N. Vijaykumar. Dynamic Pipelining: Making IP Lookup Truly Scalable. In ACM SIGCOMM 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. Sangireddy, N. Futamura, S. Aluru, and A. K. Somani. Scalable, Memory Efficient, High-Speed IP Lookup Algorithms. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 13, Aug. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. Song, S. Dharmarpurikar, J. Turner, and J. Lockwood. Fast Hash Table Lookup Using Extended Bloom Filter: An Aid to Network Processing. In ACM SIGCOMM 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Song, J. Turner, and J. Lockwood. Shape Shifting Tries for Faster IP Lookup. In IEEE ICNP 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. V. Srinivasan, S. Suri, and G. Varghese. Packet Classification Using Tuple Space Search. In ACM SIGCOMM 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. V. Srinivasan and G. Varghese. Fast Address Lookups using Controlled Prefix Expansion. ACM Transaction on Computer Systems 17, Feb. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. V. Srinivasan, G. Varghese, S. Suri, and M. Waldvogel. Fast and Scalable Layer Four Switching. In ACM SIGCOMM 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Waldvogel, G. Varghese, J. Turner, and B. Plattner. Scalable High Speed IP Routing Lookups. In ACM SIGCOMM 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Warkhede, S. Suri, and G. Varghese. Fast Packet Classification for Two-Dimensional Conflict-Free Filters. In IEEE INFOCOM 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Packet classification using coarse-grained tuple spaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ANCS '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE symposium on Architecture for networking and communications systems
      December 2006
      202 pages
      ISBN:1595935800
      DOI:10.1145/1185347

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 December 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate88of314submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader