skip to main content
10.1145/1185657.1185685acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

JPEG-HDR: a backwards-compatible, high dynamic range extension to JPEG

Published:30 July 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

The transition from traditional 24-bit RGB to high dynamic range (HDR) images is hindered by excessively large file formats with no backwards compatibility. In this paper, we demonstrate a simple approach to HDR encoding that parallels the evolution of color television from its grayscale beginnings. A tone-mapped version of each HDR original is accompanied by restorative information carried in a subband of a standard output-referred image. This subband contains a compressed ratio image, which when multiplied by the tone-mapped foreground, recovers the HDR original. The tone-mapped image data is also compressed, and the composite is delivered in a standard JPEG wrapper. To naive software, the image looks like any other, and displays as a tone-mapped version of the original. To HDR-enabled software, the foreground image is merely a tone-mapping suggestion, as the original pixel data are available by decoding the information in the subband. Our method further extends the color range to encompass the visible gamut, enabling a new generation of display devices that are just beginning to enter the market.

References

  1. ASHIKHMIN, M. 2002. A Tone Mapping Algorithm for High Contrast Images. In Proceedings of 13th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 145-156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. BAKER, S & KANADE, T. 2002. Limits on super-resolution and how to break them. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence., 24(9):1167-1183, September. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. CHIU, K. HERF, M., SHIRLEY, P., SWAMY, M., WANG, C., and ZIMMERMAN, K., 2002. A Tone Mapping Algorithm for High Contrast Images. In Proceedings of 13th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 245-253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. DALY, S. 1993. The Visible Differences Predictor: An Algorithm for the Assessment of Image Fidelity. In Digital Images and Human Vision, A.B. Watson, editor, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. DEBEVEC, P., and MALIK, J. 1997. Recovering High Dynamic Range Radiance Maps from Photographs. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 1997, 369-378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. DEBEVEC, P. 1998. Rendering Synthetic Objects into Real Scenes: Bridging Traditional and Image-Based Graphics with Global Illumination and High Dynamic Range Photography. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 1998, 189-198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. DURAND, F., and DORSEY, J. 2002. Fast Bilateral Filtering for the Display of High-Dynamic Range Images. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21, 3, 249-256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. FATTAL, R., LISCHINSKI, D., and WERMAN, M. 2002. Gradient Domain High Dynamic Range Compression. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21, 3, 257-266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. IEC. 2003. 61966-2-2. Extended RGB colour space - scRGB, Multimedia systems and equipment - Colour measurement and management - Part 2-2: Colour management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. INDEPENDENT JPEG GROUP. 1998. www.ijg.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. JOLLIFFE, C.B., 1950. Answers to Questions about Color Television. members.aol.com/ajaynejr/rca2.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. JOURLIN, M., PINOLI, J-C., 1988. A model for logarithmic image processing, Journal of Microscopy, 149(1), pp. 21-35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. KAINS, F., BOGART, R., HESS, D., SCHNEIDER, P., ANDERSON, B., 2002. OpenEXR. www.openexr.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. LEFFLER, S., WARMERDAM, F., KISELEV, A., 1999. libTIFF. remotesensing.org/libtiff.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. LI, Y., SHARAN, L., ADELSON, E. 2005. "Compressing and Companding High Dynamic Range Images with Subband Architectures," ACM Trans. on Graphics (Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH), pp. 836-44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. MANTIUK, R., KRAWCZYK, G., MYSZKOWSKI, K., SEIDEL, H-P. 2004. "Perception-motivated High Dynamic Range Video Encoding," SIGGRAPH 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. MOON P., and SPENCER, D. 1945. The Visual Effect of Non-Uniform Surrounds. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 35, 3, 233- 248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. PATTANAIK, S., FERWERDA, J., FAIRCHILD, M., and GREENBERG, D. 1998. A Multiscale Model of Adaptation and Spatial Vision for Realistic Image Display, In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 1998, 287-298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. REINHARD, E., WARD, G., PATTANAIK, S., DEBEVEC, P. 2005. High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display, and Image-based Lighting, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. REINHARD, E., STARK, M., SHIRLEY, P., and FERWERDA, J. 2002. Photographic Tone Reproduction for Digital Images. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21,3, 267-276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. SEETZEN, H., HEIDRICH, W., STUEZLINGER, W., WARD, G., WHITEHEAD, L., TRENTACOSTE, M., GHOSH, A., VOROZCOVS, A. 2004. "High Dynamic Range Display Systems," ACM Trans. Graph. (special issue SIGGRAPH 2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. SPAULDING, K., WOOLFE, G., & JOSHI, R. 2003. "Using a Residual Image to Extend the Color Gamut and Dynamic Range of an sRGB Image," white paper posted on the Kodak website.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. SPINAL TAP, THIS Is. 1984. Dir. Rob Reiner. MGM Home Entertainment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. STOKES, M., ANDERSON, M., CHANDRASEKAR, S., and MOTTA, R. 1996. Standard Default Color Space for the Internet. www.w3.org/Graphics/Color/sRGB.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. TUMBLIN, J., and TURK, G. 1999. LCIS: A Boundary Hierarchy for Detail-Preserving Contrast Reduction. ACM Trans. on Graphics, 21, 3, 83-90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. WALLACE, G. 1991. The JPEG Still Picture Compression Standard. Communications of the ACM, 34, 4, 30-44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. WARD LARSON, G., RUSHMEIER, H., and PIATKO, C. 1997. A Visibility Matching Tone Reproduction Operator for High Dynamic Range Scenes. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 3, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. WARD LARSON, G. 1998. Overcoming Gamut and Dynamic Range Limitations in Digital Images. Proc. of IS&T 6th Color Imaging Conf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. WARD, G. 1991. Real Pixels. In Graphics Gems II, edited by James Arvo, Academic Press, 80-83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. WARD, G. 1994. The RADIANCE Lighting Simulation and Rendering System., In sProceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 1994, 459-472. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. WARD, G. & SIMMONS, M. 2004. "Subband Encoding of High Dynamic Range Imagery," First Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. JPEG-HDR: a backwards-compatible, high dynamic range extension to JPEG

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGGRAPH '06: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Courses
            July 2006
            83 pages
            ISBN:1595933646
            DOI:10.1145/1185657

            Copyright © 2006 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 30 July 2006

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

            Upcoming Conference

            SIGGRAPH '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader