skip to main content
article

Report on ACM SIGIR 2006 workshop on evaluating exploratory search systems

Published:01 December 2006Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Exploratory search systems (ESS) are designed to help users move beyond simply finding information toward using that information to support learning, analysis, and decision-making. The evaluation of the interactive systems designed specifically to help exploratory searchers is a challenging area, worthy of further discussion in the research community. In this article we report on a workshop conducted in conjunction with the ACM SIGIR Conference in Seattle, USA, in August 2006. The workshop involved researchers, academics, and practitioners discussing the formative and summative evaluation of ESS.

References

  1. Allan, J. (2003). HARD Track Overview in TREC 2003: High accuracy retrieval from documents. In Proceedings of the Text Retrieval Conference, pp 24--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett, L. F. and Barrett, D. J. (2001). An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computing Review, 19(2):175--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Borlund, P. and Ingwersen, P. (1998). Measures of relative relevance and ranked half-life: performance indicators for interactive IR. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 324--331. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cronen-Townsend, S., Zhou, Y., and Croft. W. B. (2002). Predicting query performance. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 299--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dumais, S. and Belkin, N. J. (2005). The TREC Interactive Track: Putting the user into search. In Voorhees, E. and Harman, D. (Eds.) TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval, MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lagergren, E. and Over, P. (2001). Comparing interactive information retrieval systems across sites: The TREC-6 interactive track matrix experiment. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 164--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Landauer, T. K. (2002). On the computational basis of learning and cognition: Arguments from LSA. The psychology of learning and motivation, 41: 43--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. White, R. W., Drucker, S., Kules, B. and schraefel, m. c. (2006). Supporting exploratory search. Communications of the ACM (Special Section), 49 (4): 36--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Report on ACM SIGIR 2006 workshop on evaluating exploratory search systems
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGIR Forum
        ACM SIGIR Forum  Volume 40, Issue 2
        December 2006
        64 pages
        ISSN:0163-5840
        DOI:10.1145/1189702
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2006 Authors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 December 2006

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader