skip to main content
article

Goal-oriented optimal subset selection of correlated multimedia streams

Published:01 February 2007Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A multimedia analysis system utilizes a set of correlated media streams, each of which, we assume, has a confidence level and a cost associated with it, and each of which partially helps in achieving the system goal. However, the fact that at any instant, not all of the media streams contribute towards a system goal brings up the issue of finding the best subset from the available set of media streams. For example, a subset of two video cameras and two microphones could be better than any other subset of sensors at some time instance to achieve a surveillance goal (e.g. event detection). This article presents a novel framework that finds the optimal subset of media streams so as to achieve the system goal under specified constraints. The proposed framework uses a dynamic programming approach to find the optimal subset of media streams based on three different criteria: first, by maximizing the probability of achieving the goal under the specified cost and confidence; second, by maximizing the confidence in the achieved goal under the specified cost and probability with which the goal is achieved; and third, by minimizing the cost to achieve the goal with a specified probability and confidence. Each of these problems is proven to be NP-Complete. From an AI point of view, the solution we propose is heuristic-based, and for each criterion, utilizes a heuristic function which for a given problem, combines optimal solutions of small-sized subproblems to yield a potential near-optimal solution to the original problem. The proposed framework allows for a tradeoff among the aforementioned three criteria, and offers the flexibility to compare whether any one set of media streams of low cost would be better than any other set of higher cost, or whether any one set of media streams of high confidence would be better than any other set of low confidence. To show the utility of our framework, we provide the experimental results for event detection in a surveillance scenario.

References

  1. Atrey, P. K. and Kankanhalli, M. S. 2005. Goal based optimal selection of media streams. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). 305--308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Atrey, P. K., Kankanhalli, M. S., and Jain, R. 2005. Timeline-Based information assimilation in multimedia surveillance and monitoring systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks (Singapore). 103--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Atrey, P. K., Maddage, N. C., and Kankanhalli, M. S. 2006. Audio based event detection for multimedia surveillance. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. V813--816.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Debouk, R., Lafortune, S., and Teneketzis, D. 2002. On an optimal problem in sensor selection. J. Discrete Event Dynamic Syst.: Theory Appl. 12, 417--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Isler, V. and Bajcsy, R. 2005. The sensor selection problem for bounded uncertainty sensing models. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (Los Angeles, CA). 151--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jain, R. 2004. Refining the search engine. Ubiquity 5, 29 (Sept.). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jiang, S., Kumar, R., and Garcia, H. E. 2003. Optimal sensor selection for discrete event systems with partial observation. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 48, 369--381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lam, K.-Y., Cheng, R., Liang, B., and Chau, J. 2004. Sensor node selection for execution of continuous probabilistic queries in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks (New York). 63--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Nevatia, R., Zhao, T., and Hongeng, S. 2003. Hierarchical language-based representation of events in video streams. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Event Mining (Madison, WI).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Oommen, B. J. and Rueda, L. 2005. A formal analysis of why heuristic functions work. Artif. Intell. J. 164, 1--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Pahalawatta, P., Pappas, T. N., and Katsaggelos, A. K. 2004. Optimal sensor selection for video-based target tracking in a wireless sensor network. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Singapore, V:3073--3076.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Siegel, M. and Wu, H. 2004. Confidence fusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot Sensing. 96--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Stauffer, C. and Grimson, W. E. L. 1999. Adaptive background mixture models for real-time tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2 (Ft. Collins, CO). 252--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Goal-oriented optimal subset selection of correlated multimedia streams

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader