skip to main content
article

Moving digital libraries into the student learning space: The GetSmart experience

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 March 2006Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The GetSmart system was built to support theoretically sound learning processes in a digital library environment by integrating course management, digital library, and concept mapping components to support a constructivist, six-step, information search process. In the fall of 2002 more than 100 students created 1400 concept maps as part of selected computing classes offered at the University of Arizona and Virginia Tech. Those students conducted searches, obtained course information, created concept maps, collaborated in acquiring knowledge, and presented their knowledge representations. This article connects the design elements of the GetSmart system to targeted concept-map-based learning processes, describes our system and research testbed, and analyzes our system usage logs. Results suggest that students did in fact use the tools in an integrated fashion, combining knowledge representation and search activities. After concept mapping was included in the curriculum, we observed improvement in students' online quiz scores. Further, we observed that students in groups collaboratively constructed concept maps with multiple group members viewing and updating map details.

References

  1. Ausubel, D. P. 1968. Educational Psychology: A Ccognitive View. Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Canas, A. J., Leake, D. B., and Wilson, D. C. 1999. Managing, mapping and manipulating conceptual knowledge: exploring the synergies of knowledge management & case-based reasoning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Exploring Synergies of Knowledge Management and Case-based Reasoning (Menlo Park, CA), 10--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, S.-W., Lin, S. C., and Chang, K. E. 2001. Attributed concept maps: Fuzzy integration and fuzzy matching. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 31, 842--852. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chmielewski, T. L. and Dansereau, D. F. 1998. Enhancing the recall of text: knowledge mapping training promotes implicit transfer. J. Educational Psychology 90, 407--413.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalgarno, B. 2001. Interpretations of constructivism and consequences for computer assisted learning. British J. Educational Technology 32, 183--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaines, B. R. 1995. Class library implementation of an open architecture knowledge support system. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 41, 59--107. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaines, B. R. and Shaw, M. L. G. 1995. Concept maps as hypermedia components. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 43, 323--361. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamilton, S. 2001. Thinking outside the box at the IHMC. IEEE Computer 34, 61--71. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Herl, H. E., O'Neil, J., Chung, G., and Schacter, J. 1999. Reliability and validity of a computer-based knowledge mapping system to measure content understanding. Computers in Human Behavior 15, 315--333.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Honey, M., McMillan Culp, K., and Carrigg, F.1999. Perspectives on technology and education research: Lessons from the past and present. Presented at the National Conference on Educational Technology (Washington DC). http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/techconf99/whitepapers/paper1.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hung, D. 2001. Design principles for web-based learning: Implications from Vygotskian thought. Educational Technology 41, 33--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hung, D. and Nichani, M. 2001. Constructivism and e-learning: balancing between the individual and social levels of cognition. Educational Technology 41, 40--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kinchin, I. M. 2001. If concept mapping is so helpful to learning biology, why aren't we all doing it? Int. J. Science Education 23, 1257--1269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Komis, V., Avouris, N., and Fidas, C. 2002. Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: study of synchronous peer interaction. Education and Information Technology 7, 169--188. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kremer, R. 1994. Concept mapping: informal to formal. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Conceptual Structures (University of Maryland) http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~kremer/papers/ICCS94.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kremer, R. and Gaines, B. R. 1994. Groupware concept mapping techniques. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Iinternational Conference on Systems Documentation (Banff, Alberta). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuhlthau, C. 1997. Learning in digital libraries: An information search process approach. Library Trends 45, 708--724.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuhlthau, C. 1991. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. J. American Society for Information Science 42, 361--371.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lagoze, C., Arms, W., Gan, S., Hillmann, D., Ingram, C., Krafft, D., Marisa, R., Phipps, J., Saylor, J., Terrizzi, C., Hoehn, W., Millman, D., Allan, J., Guzman-Lara, S., and Kalt, T. 2002. Core services in the architecture of the national science digital library (NSDL). In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (Portland, OR). ACM, New York,. 201--209. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lambiotte, J. G., Skaggs, L. P., and Dansereau, D. F. 1993. Learning from lectures - Effects of knowledge maps and cooperative review strategies. Applied Cognitive Psychology 7, 483--497.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lambiotte, J. G., Dansereau, D. F., Cross, D. R., and Reynolds, S. B. 1989. Multirelational semantic maps. Educational Psychology Rev. 1, 331--367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Marshall, B., Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Lally, Shen, A. R., Fox, E., and Cassel, L. 2003. Convergence of knowledge management and e-learning: the GetSmart experience. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (Houston, TX). 135--146. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Marshall, B., Chen, H., and Madhusudan, T. 2006. Matching knowledge elements in concept maps using a similarity flooding algorithm. Decision Support Systems 42, 1290--1306. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. McCagg, E. C. and Dansereau, D. F. 1991. A convergent paradigm for examining knowledge mapping as a learning-strategy. J. Educational Research 84, 317--324.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. McClure, J. R., Sonak, B., and Suen, H. K. 1999. Concept map assessment of classroom learning: reliability, validity and logistical practicality. J. Research in Science Teaching 36, 475--492.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mishra, S. 2002. A design framework for online learning environments. British J. Educational Technology 33, 493--496.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Novak, J. 1998. Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Novak, J. and Gowin, D. B. 1984. Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. NSF 2005. NSDL Funded Projects, 2005. Accessed 9/7/05. http://nsdl.org/about/projects.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. NSF 2004. NSDL Annual Report, 2004. Accessed 9/7/05. http://nsdl.org/about/annual_report.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., and Hall, R. H. 2002. Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Rev. 14, 71--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Oliver, R. 1999. Exploring strategies for online teaching and learning. Distance Education 20, 240--254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Oughton, J. M. and Reed, W. M. 1999. The influence of learner differences on the construction of hypermedia concepts: a case study.Computers in Human Behavior 15, 11--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Perugini, S., McDevitt, K., Richardson, R., Perez-Quinones, M., Shen, R., Ramakrishnan, N., Williams, C., and Fox, E. A. 2004. Enhancing usability in CITIDEL: Multimodal, multilingual, and interactive visualization interfaces. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. (Tucson, AZ). ACM, New York, 315--324. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Regev, G. 2000. Knoware, a concept map based collaborative virtual environment. SIGGROUP Bull. 21, 14--15. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Saad, A. and Zaghloul, A.-R. M. 2002. A knowledge visualization tool for teaching and learning computer engineering knowledge, concepts, and skills. In Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (Boston, MA), T2F-7--T2F-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Soloway, E., Norris, C., Blumfield, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J., and Marx, R. 2000. K-12 and the Internet. Commun. ACM 43, 19--23. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sowa, J. F. 1984. Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Sumner, T. and Marlino, M. 2004. Digital libraries and educational practice: A case for new models. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (Tucson, AZ). ACM, New York, 170--178. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Moving digital libraries into the student learning space: The GetSmart experience

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Journal on Educational Resources in Computing
        Journal on Educational Resources in Computing  Volume 6, Issue 1
        March 2006
        53 pages
        ISSN:1531-4278
        EISSN:1531-4278
        DOI:10.1145/1217862
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 March 2006
        Published in jeric Volume 6, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader