skip to main content
article
Free Access

LEGALESE: a legal argumentation tool

Published:01 January 1991Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

For my dissertation I have constructed a computer tool called LEGALESE that assists lawyers in the construction of legal arguments. The specific type of legal argument involved is the kind presented in legal briefs, where a lawyer presents an argument on behalf of a client. LEGALESE is a graphical, hypertext based tool that has been constructed on a Macintosh computer using HyperCard.

References

  1. Conklin, J. and Begeman, M. L., "gIBIS: A hypertext tool for team design deliberation," Hypertext '87 Papers, pp. 247--251, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Conklin, J. and Begeman, M. L., "gIBIS: A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion," Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 140--152, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Frank, J., Courts on Trial, Princeton University Press, 1949.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Gomez, L. M., and Dumais, S. T., "The vocabulary problem in human-system communication," 30 CACM 964--971, November, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Landauer, T. K., Galotti, K. M., and Hartwell, S., "Natural command names and initial learning: A study of text-editing terms," 26 CACM 495--503, July, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Loevinger, L., "Jurimetrics the next step forward," University of Minnesota Law Review, 33:455--493, 1949.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Marshall, C. C., "Exploring representation problems using hypertext," Proceedings of Hypertext-87, pp. 253--268, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Marshall, C. C., "Representing the structure of a legal argument," Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 121--127, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. McCall, R., "PHI: An argumentative design method," to appear in Design Methods and Theories.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Boston, Massachusetts, May 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vancouver, British Columbia, June, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Smolensky, P., Fox, B., King, R., and Lewis, C., "Computer-aided reasoned discourse, or, how to argue with a computer," Cognitive Science and Its Applications for Human-Computer Interaction, Guindon, R. (ed.), pp. 109--162, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Toulmin, S., The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, 1958.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. LEGALESE: a legal argumentation tool

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGCHI Bulletin
          ACM SIGCHI Bulletin  Volume 23, Issue 1
          Jan. 1991
          90 pages
          ISSN:0736-6906
          DOI:10.1145/122672
          • Editor:
          • Bill Hefley
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1991 Author

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 January 1991

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader