skip to main content
10.1145/1226969.1226994acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Explicit interaction for surgical rehabilitation

Published:15 February 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

We discuss the design ideal of explicit interaction, which is a way to approach the dimensions of explicitness versus ambience and explicitness versus obtrusiveness in ubiquitous computing. Explicit interaction refers to interaction techniques designed to make actions and intentions visible, understandable and accountable. We introduce three levels of analysis---usability, materialization, and social performance---and present the design of an explicit interaction assembly of devices for rehabilitation after hand surgery. The assembly, intended to support video recording during patient-therapist consultations, is evaluated and we find that it provides superior usability and the potential to improve rehabilitation outcomes through materialization. Moreover, we find that the design of cues to support the social practice in the rehabilitation ward needs to be improved since the assembly allowed for uses unanticipated during the design.

References

  1. Chalmers, M., Dieberger, A., Höök, K., Rudström, Å. (2004). Social navigation and seamful design. Cognitive Studies 11(3):171--181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hallnäs, L., Redström, J. (2002). From use to presence: On the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction 9(2):106--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Iacucci, G. (2004). Interaction as performance. PhD dissertation, Oulu, Finland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Monö, R. (1997). Design for product understanding. Liber.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Norman, D. (2004). Affordances and design. At <www.jnd.org/dn.mss/affordances_and.html>, accessed Sept 1, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Palcom project website. <www.ist-palcom.org>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Poynor, R. (1995). The hand that rocks the cradle. I.D. -- The International Design Magazine, May/June, pp. 60--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ullmer, B., Ishii, H. (2001). Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Systems Journal 39(3/4):915--931. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Explicit interaction for surgical rehabilitation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          TEI '07: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction
          February 2007
          296 pages
          ISBN:9781595936196
          DOI:10.1145/1226969
          • Conference Chairs:
          • Brygg Ullmer,
          • Albrecht Schmidt

          Copyright © 2007 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 February 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader