Michelle Craig
ABSTRACT
Trying to improve undergraduate teaching based on feedback collected by traditional student course evaluations can be a frustrating experience. Unclear, contradictory and ill-informed student comments leave instructors confused and discouraged. We designed and then implemented an evaluation mechanism where an independent CS faculty peer visits a lecture and holds an evaluation discussion with the students. These facilitated discussions begin by looking at overall strengths and weaknesses for the course but quickly focus on the key student concerns and suggestions for improvement. After conducting thirty four facilitated discussions, we find them appreciated by students who feel heard and valued. A survey of participating faculty indicates that the written discussion report is more useful to them than standard student survey results. Faculty report that they have made changes based on the recommendations and limited quantitative data suggests that teaching has improved and its value in the departmental culture has increased. In this paper we describe the evaluation process, discuss our experiences and offer some concrete suggestions for those who might want to try this approach in their own department.
- R. A. Arreola. Developing a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System. Anker Publishing Company, Bolton, Massachusetts, 1995.Google Scholar
- K. T. Brinko. Instructional consultation with feedback in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 61(1):65--83, Jan/Feb 1990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Hutchings. Making Teaching Community Property: A Menu for Peer Collaboration and Peer Review. Americal Association for Higher Education, Washington, D.C., 1996.Google Scholar
- F. Lyman. The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all students. In A. Anderson, editor, Mainstreaming Digest, pages 109--113. College Park: University of Maryland Press., 1981.Google Scholar
- H. W. Marsh and L. Roche. The use of students' evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 30(1):217--251, Spring 1993.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Overall and H. W. Marsh. Midterm feedback from students: Its relationship to instrutional improvement and students' cognitive and affective outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(6):856--865, June 1979.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. M. R. L'Hommedieu and K. Brinko. Methodological explanations for the modest effects of feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1):232--241, 1990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Redmond and D. Clark. A practical approach to improving teaching. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 1:9--10, 1982.Google Scholar
- P. Seldin. The use and abuse of student ratings of professors. The Chronicle of Higher Education, July 1993.Google Scholar
- P. Seldin. Using student feedback to improve teaching. To Improve the Academy, 16:335--345, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Weimer. Improving College Teaching: Strategies for Developing Instructional Effectiveness. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1990.Google Scholar
- R. C. Wilson. Improving faculty teaching: Effective use of student evaluations and consultants. Journal of Higher Education, 57(2):196--211, March 1986.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Facilitated student discussions for evaluating teaching
Recommendations
Facilitated student discussions for evaluating teaching
Trying to improve undergraduate teaching based on feedback collected by traditional student course evaluations can be a frustrating experience. Unclear, contradictory and ill-informed student comments leave instructors confused and discouraged. We ...
Using daily student presentations to address attitudes and communication skills in CS1
SIGCSE '09: Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science educationMany CS1 courses lack a breadth in coverage of computing-related topics and do not actively engage in non-programming computer science topics. In addition, many introductory (and advanced) courses fail to help students develop oral communication skills. ...
Design and Implementation of Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation System for Teaching Effect of Physical Education in Colleges and Universities
CONF-CDS 2021: The 2nd International Conference on Computing and Data ScienceIn recent years, with the development of modern education in China, higher requirements are put forward for physical education. At present, the evaluation of education effect mainly depends on the teaching evaluation system, but the evaluation of the ...
Comments