skip to main content
10.1145/1236360.1236372acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Blind calibration of sensor networks

Published: 25 April 2007 Publication History

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of blindly calibrating sensor response using routine sensor network measurements. We show that as long as the sensors slightly oversample the signals of interest, then unknown sensor gains can be perfectly recovered. Remarkably, neither a controlled stimulus nor a dense deployment is required. We also characterize necessary and sufficient conditions for the identification of unknown sensor offsets. Our results exploit incoherence conditions between the basis for the signals and the canonical or natural basis for the sensor measurements. Practical algorithms for gain and offset identification are proposed based on the singular value decomposition and standard least squares techniques. We investigate the robustness of the proposed algorithms to model mismatch and noise on both simulated data and on data from current sensor network deployments.

References

[1]
L. Balzano and N.R. et al. An investigation of sensor integrity. Technical Report UCLA-NESL-200510-01, Networked and Embedded Systems Laboratory, 2005.
[2]
L. Balzano and R. Nowak. Blind calibration. Technical Report TR-UCLA-NESL-200702-01, Networked and suit-Embedded Systems Laboratory, February 2007.
[3]
P. Buonadonna, D. Gay, J. Hellerstein, W. Hong, and S. Madden. Task:Sensor network in a box. Technical Report IRB-TR-04-021, Intel Research Berkeley, January 2005.
[4]
V. Bychkovskiy, S. Megerian, D. Estrin, and M. Potkonjak. A collaborative approach to in-place sensor calibration. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2634:301--316, 2003.
[5]
E. Candes and J. Romberg. Quantitative robust uncertainty principles and optimally sparse decompositions. Foundations of Computational Mathematics 2006.
[6]
J. Feng, S. Megerian, and M. Potkonjak. Model-based calibration for sensor networks. Sensors pages 737--742, October 2003.
[7]
G. Harikumar and Y. Bresler. Perfect blind restoration of images blurred by multiple filters: Theory and efficient algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 8(2):202--219, February 1999.
[8]
B. Hoadley. A bayesian look at inverse linear regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65(329):356--369, March 1970.
[9]
A. Ihler, J. Fisher, R. Moses, and A. Willsky. Nonparametric belief propagation for self-calibration in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks 2004.
[10]
N. Ramanathan and L.B. et al. Rapid deployment with confidence: Calibration and fault detection in environmental sensor networks. Technical Report CENS TR 62, Center for Embedded Networked Sensing, 2006.
[11]
O. Shalvi and E. Weinstein. New criteria for blind deconvolution of nonmimimum phase systems (channels). IEEE Trans. on Information Theory IT-36(2):312--321, March 1990.
[12]
C. Taylor, A. Rahimi, J. Bachrach, H. Shrobe, and A. Grue. Simultaneous localization, calibration, and tracking in an ad hoc sensor network. In IPSN'06: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks pages 27--33, 2006.
[13]
G. Tolle and J.P. et al. A macroscope in the redwoods. In Proceedings of Sensys 2005.
[14]
K. Whitehouse and D. Culler. Calibration as parameter estimation in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications pages 59--67, 2002.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Meta-learning for few-shot sensor self-calibration to increase stress robustnessEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109171138:PAOnline publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2023)A dynamic spatial filtering approach to mitigate underestimation bias in field calibrated low-cost sensor air pollution dataThe Annals of Applied Statistics10.1214/23-AOAS175117:4Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Strategies to obtain a better quality of environmental data gathered by low cost systemsEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment10.1007/s10661-022-10805-2195:2Online publication date: 11-Jan-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IPSN '07: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks
April 2007
592 pages
ISBN:9781595936387
DOI:10.1145/1236360
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 April 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. calibration
  2. sampling
  3. sensor networks

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

IPSN07
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 143 of 593 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)70
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Meta-learning for few-shot sensor self-calibration to increase stress robustnessEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109171138:PAOnline publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2023)A dynamic spatial filtering approach to mitigate underestimation bias in field calibrated low-cost sensor air pollution dataThe Annals of Applied Statistics10.1214/23-AOAS175117:4Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Strategies to obtain a better quality of environmental data gathered by low cost systemsEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment10.1007/s10661-022-10805-2195:2Online publication date: 11-Jan-2023
  • (2022)A scalable, self‐supervised calibration and confounder removal model for opportunistic monitoring of road degradationComputer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering10.1111/mice.1282137:13(1703-1720)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2022
  • (2021)Compensating Altered Sensitivity of Duty-Cycled MOX Gas Sensors with Machine Learning2021 18th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON)10.1109/SECON52354.2021.9491586(1-9)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2021
  • (2021)CrowdsourcingSpringer Handbook of Atmospheric Measurements10.1007/978-3-030-52171-4_44(1207-1239)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2020)Framework for the Simulation of Sensor Networks Aimed at Evaluating In Situ Calibration AlgorithmsSensors10.3390/s2016457720:16(4577)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2020
  • (2020)In-situ Calibration of Networked Air-Quality Sensor Nodes2020 XXIX International Scientific Conference Electronics (ET)10.1109/ET50336.2020.9238168(1-4)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2020
  • (2019)Sensor Drift Calibration via Spatial Correlation Model in Smart BuildingProceedings of the 56th Annual Design Automation Conference 201910.1145/3316781.3317909(1-6)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2019
  • (2018)Global geometry of multichannel sparse blind deconvolution on the sphereProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3326943.3327048(1140-1151)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2018
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media