skip to main content
10.1145/1236360.1236375acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Robust message-passing for statistical inference in sensor networks

Published: 25 April 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Large-scale sensor network applications require in-network processing and data fusion to compute statistically relevant summaries of the sensed measurements. This paper studies distributed message-passing algorithms, in which neighboring nodes in the network pass local information relevant to a global computation, for performing statistical inference. We focus on the class of reweighted belief propagation (RBP) algorithms, which includes as special cases the standard sum-product and max-product algorithms for general networks with cycles, but in contrast to standard algorithms has attractive theoretical properties (uniqueness of fixed points, convergence, and robustness). Our main contribution is to design and implement a practical and modular architecture for implementing RBP algorithms in real networks. In addition, we show how intelligent scheduling of RBP messages can be used to minimize communication between motes and prolong the lifetime of the network. Our simulation and Mica2 mote deployment indicate that the proposed algorithms achieve accurate results despite real-world problems such as dying motes, dead and asymmetric links, and dropped messages. Overall, the class of RBP provides provides an ideal fit for sensor networks due to their distributed nature, requiring only local knowledge and coordination, and little requirements on other services such as reliable transmission.

References

[1]
M. Cetin, L. Chen, J. W. Fisher, A. T. Ihler, R. L. Moses, M. J. Wainwright, and A. S. Willsky. Distributed fusion in sensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 23:42--55, 2006.
[2]
L. Chen, M. J. Wainwright, M. Cetin, and A. Willsky. Multitarget-multisensor data association using the tree-reweighted max-product algorithm. In SPIE Aerosense Conference, April 2003.
[3]
C. Crick and A. Pfeffer. Loopy belief propagation as a basis for communication in sensor networks. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, July 2003.
[4]
A. G. Dimakis, V. Prabhakaran, and K. Ramchandran. Ubiquitous access to distributed data in large-scale sensor networks through decentralized erasure codes. In Proc. Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), April 2005.
[5]
A. G. Dimakis, A. D. Sarwate, and M. J. Wainwright. Geographic gossip: Efficient aggregation for sensor networks. In Proc. Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), April 2006.
[6]
A. Ihler, J. Fisher, and A. S. Willsky. Loopy belief propagation: Convergence and effects of message errors. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6:905--936, May 2005.
[7]
V. Kolmogorov. Convergent tree-reweighted message-passing for energy minimization. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 2006. To appear.
[8]
S. L. Lauritzen and D. J. Spiegelhalter. Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 50:155--224, January 1988.
[9]
A. Levin and Y. Weiss. Learning to combine bottom-up and top-down segmentation. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), June 2006.
[10]
E. C. Liu and J. M. F. Moura. Fusion in sensor networks: convergence study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustic, Speech, and Signal Processing, volume 3, pages 865--868, May 2004.
[11]
A. Meliou, D. Chu, C. Guestrin, J. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. Data gathering tours in sensor networks. In Proc. Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), April 2006.
[12]
T. Meltzer, C. Yanover, and Y. Weiss. Globally optimal solutions for energy minimization in stereo vision using reweighted belief propagation. In Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, June 2005.
[13]
J. M. F. Moura, J. Lu, and M. Kleiner. Intelligent sensor fusion: a graphical model approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustic, Speech, and Signal Processing, April 2003.
[14]
M. Paskin, C. Guestrin, and J. McFadden. A robust architecture for distributed inference in sensor networks. In Proc. Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), April 2005.
[15]
T. Roosta, M. J. Wainwright, and S. Sastry. Convergence analysis of reweighted sum-product algorithms. In Int. Conf. Acoustic, Speech and Sig. Proc., April 2007.
[16]
S. Tatikonda and M. I. Jordan. Loopy belief propagation and Gibbs measures. In Proc. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, volume 18, pages 493--500, August 2002.
[17]
M. J. Wainwright. Estimating the "wrong" graphical model: Benefits in the computation-limited regime. Journal of Machine Learning Research, pages 1829--1859, September 2006.
[18]
M. J. Wainwright, T. S. Jaakkola, and A. S. Willsky. Exact MAP estimates via agreement on (hyper)trees: Linear programming and message-passing. IEEE Trans. Information Theory, 51(11):3697--3717, November 2005.
[19]
W. Wiegerinck. Approximations with reweighted generalized belief propagation. In Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, January 2005.
[20]
C. Yanover, T. Meltzer, and Y. Weiss. Linear programming relaxations and belief propagation: An empirical study. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:1887--1907, September 2006.
[21]
J. Yedidia, W. T. Freeman, and Y. Weiss. Constructing free energy approximations and generalized belief propagation algorithms. IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, 51(7):2282--2312, July 2005.
[22]
F. Zhao, J. Liu, J. Liu, L. Guibas, and J. Reich. Collaborative Signal and Information Processing: an Information-Directed Approach. IEEE Trans. Commun., 91(8): 1199--1209, August 2003.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Learning Data Dependency with Communication CostProceedings of the Eighteenth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing10.1145/3209582.3209600(171-180)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2018
  • (2016)Optimizing Graphical Model Structure for Distributed Inference in Wireless Sensor Networks2016 13th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON)10.1109/SAHCN.2016.7733005(1-9)Online publication date: Jun-2016
  • (2015)Energy-Efficient and Robust In-Network Inference in Wireless Sensor NetworksIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics10.1109/TCYB.2014.236554145:10(2105-2118)Online publication date: Oct-2015
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IPSN '07: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks
April 2007
592 pages
ISBN:9781595936387
DOI:10.1145/1236360
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 April 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. message-passing algorithms
  2. reweighted belief propagation
  3. sensor networks
  4. statistical inference

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

IPSN07
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 143 of 593 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Learning Data Dependency with Communication CostProceedings of the Eighteenth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing10.1145/3209582.3209600(171-180)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2018
  • (2016)Optimizing Graphical Model Structure for Distributed Inference in Wireless Sensor Networks2016 13th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON)10.1109/SAHCN.2016.7733005(1-9)Online publication date: Jun-2016
  • (2015)Energy-Efficient and Robust In-Network Inference in Wireless Sensor NetworksIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics10.1109/TCYB.2014.236554145:10(2105-2118)Online publication date: Oct-2015
  • (2014)Distributed data association in smart camera networks using belief propagationACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/253000010:2(1-24)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2014
  • (2013)Distributed Bayesian Inference for Consistent Labeling of Tracked Objects in Nonoverlapping Camera NetworksInternational Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks10.1155/2013/6132469:12(613246)Online publication date: Jan-2013
  • (2012)A unified wireless sensor network framework2012 IEEE International Systems Conference SysCon 201210.1109/SysCon.2012.6189450(1-6)Online publication date: Mar-2012
  • (2012)Inference in wireless sensor networks based on information structure optimizationProceedings of the 2012 IEEE 37th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN 2012)10.1109/LCN.2012.6423674(551-558)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2012
  • (2011)Distributed inference and query processing for RFID tracking and monitoringProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/1952376.19523824:5(326-337)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2011
  • (2011)Trust-assisted anomaly detection and localization in wireless sensor networks2011 8th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks10.1109/SAHCN.2011.5984922(386-394)Online publication date: Jun-2011
  • (2011)Kernel-based Markov random fields learning for wireless sensor networksProceedings of the 2011 IEEE 36th Conference on Local Computer Networks10.1109/LCN.2011.6115175(155-158)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2011
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media