skip to main content
10.1145/1236360.1236403acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Distributed sparse random projections for refinable approximation

Published:25 April 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Consider a large-scale wireless sensor network measuring compressible data, where n distributed data values can be well-approximated using only k « n coefficients of some known transform. We address the problem of recovering an approximation of the n data values by querying any L sensors, so that the reconstruction error is comparable to the optimal k-term approximation. To solve this problem, we present a novel distributed algorithm based on sparse random projections, which requires no global coordination or knowledge. The key idea is that the sparsity of the random projections greatly reduces the communication cost of pre-processing the data. Our algorithm allows the collector to choose the number of sensors to query according to the desired approximation error. The reconstruction quality depends only on the number of sensors queried, enabling robust refinable approximation.

References

  1. E. Candes and T. Tao. Near Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(12), pp. 5406--5425, December 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Donoho. Compressed Sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(4), pp. 1289--1306, April 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. http://www.dsp.ece.rice.edu/CS/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Rabbat, J. Haupt, A. Singh, and R. Nowak. Decentralized Compression and Predistribution via Randomized Gossiping. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. W. Bajwa, J. Haupt, A. Sayeed, and R. Nowak. Compressive Wireless Sensing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Baron, M.F. Duarte, S. Sarvotham, M.B. Wakin, and R. Baraniuk. An Information-Theoretic Approach to Distributed Compressed Sensing. Proceedings of the 43rd Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. N. Alon, Y. Matias, and M. Szegedy. The space complexity of approximating the frequency moments. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A.C. Gilbert, Y. Kotidis, S. Muthukrishnan, and M.J. Strauss. One-Pass Wavelet Decompositions of Data Streams. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15(3), pp. 541--554, May 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Cormode, M. Garofalakis, and D. Sacharidis. Fast Approximate Wavelet Tracking on Streams. Proceedings of the International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. W.B. Johnson and J. Lindenstrauss. Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into a Hilbert space. Proceedings of the Conference in Modern Analysis and Probability, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. D. Achlioptas. Database-friendly random projections: Johnson-Lindenstrauss with binary coins. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 66(4), pp. 671--687, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Li, T.J. Hastie, and K.W. Church. Very Sparse Random Projections. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Ailon and B. Chazelle. Approximate Nearest Neighbors and the Fast Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R.A. Horn and C.R. Johnson. Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Vetterli and J. KovačeviĆ. Wavelets and Subband Coding. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Mallat. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Penrose. Random Geometric Graphs. Oxford University Press, UK, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. W. Wang and K. Ramchandran. Random Distributed Multiresolution Representations with Significance Querying. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A.G. Dimakis, V. Prabhakaran, and K. Ramchandran. Ubiquitous Access to Distributed Data in Large-Scale Sensor Networks through Decentralized Erasure Codes. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. G. Gallager. Low Density Parity-Check Codes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M. Luby. LT Codes. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Distributed sparse random projections for refinable approximation

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            IPSN '07: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks
            April 2007
            592 pages
            ISBN:9781595936387
            DOI:10.1145/1236360

            Copyright © 2007 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 25 April 2007

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate143of593submissions,24%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader