skip to main content
10.1145/1240624.1240811acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Capturing, sharing, and using local place information

Published:29 April 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

With new technology, people can share information about everyday places they go; the resulting data helps others find and evaluate places. Recent applications like Dodgeball and Sharescape repurpose everyday place information: users create local place data for personal use, and the systems display it for public use. We explore both the opportunities -- new local knowledge, and concerns -- privacy risks, raised by this implicit information sharing. We conduct two empirical studies: subjects create place data when using PlaceMail, a location-based reminder system, and elect whether to share it on Sharescape, a community map-building system. We contribute by: (1) showing location-based reminders yield new local knowledge about a variety of places, (2) identifying heuristics people use when deciding what place-related information to share (and their prevalence), (3) detailing how these decision heuristics can inform local knowledge sharing system design, and (4) identifying new uses of shared place information, notably opportunistic errand planning.

References

  1. Ackerman, M., Cranor, L. (1999). Privacy Critics: UI components to safeguard users' privacy. Proc. CHI, 258--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ackerman, M. S. (2000). The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requriements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15 (2--3). 181--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alt, C., Astrachan, O., Forbes, J., Lucic, R., Rodger, S. (2006). Social networks generate interest in computer science. Proc. SIGCSE, 438--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ashbrook, D., Starner, T. (2003). Using GPS to Learn Significant Locations and Predict Movements Across Multiple Users. Pers./Ubiq. Computing, V7, n5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Barkhuus, L., Dey, A. (2003). Location-Based Services for Mobile Telephony: a Study of Users' Privacy Concerns. Proc., INTERACT, 709--712.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Buyukkokten, O., Cho, J., Garcia-Molina, H., Gravano, L., Shivakumar, N. (1999). Exploiting geographical location information of web pages. ACM SIGMOD Workshop on the Web and Databases.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Consolvo, S., Smith, I., Matthews, T., LaMarca, A., Tabert, J., Powledge, P. (2005) Location Disclosure to Social Relations: Why, When, & What People Want to Share. Proc. CHI, 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Finder, A. (2006). For Some, Online Persona Undermines a Résumé. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/11/us/11recruit.html?ei=5090&en=ddfbe1e3b386090b&ex=1307678400Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedman, B., Howe, D., (2002). Informed Consent in the Mozilla Browser: Implementing Value-Sensitive Design. Proc. Hawaii Intl. Conf. on System Sciences. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Froehlich, J., Chen, M., Smith, I., Potter, F. (2006). Voting With Your Feet: An Investigative Study of the Relationship Between Place Visit Behavior and Preference. Proc. Ubicomp.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Goetz, S., Swaminathan, H. (2006). WalMart and County-Wide Poverty. Social Science Quarterly (87) 2, 211--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gross, R., Acquisti, A. (2005). Information Revelation and Privacy in Online Social Networks, Workshop, Privacy in Electronic Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hill, W.C., Hollan, J.D., Wroblewski, D., and McCandless, T., (1992). Edit Wear and Read Wear, Proc. CHI, 3--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Himmelstein, M., (2005). Local Search: The Internet Is the Yellow Pages, IEEE Computing: 38, 2. 26--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hong, J., Ng, J., Lederer, S., Landay, J. (2004) Privacy risk models for designing privacy-sensitive ubiquitous computing systems. Proc DIS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Iachello, G., Smith, I., Consolvo, S., Abowd, G., Hughes, J., Howard, J., Potter, F., Scott, J., Sohn, T., Hightower, J., Lamarca, A. (2005) Control, Deception and Communication: Evaluating the Deployment of a Location-Enhanced Messaging Service. Proc. Intl. Conf. on Ubiquitous Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Klepis, N., Nelson, W., Ott, W., Robinson, J., Tsang, A., Switzer, P., Behar, J., Hern, S., Engelmann, W. (2001). The National Human Activity Pattern Survey, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, May-June, v. 11, 3, 231--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lederer, S., J.I. Hong, A. Dey, and J.A. Landay, (2004). Personal Privacy through Understanding and Action: Five Pitfalls for Designers. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 8(6): 440--454. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ludford, P., Frankowski, D., Reily, K., Wilms, K., Terveen, L. (2006). Because I Carry My Cell Phone Anyway: Effective Everyday Task Management. Proc. CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Olson, J.S., Grudin, J., and Horvitz, E. (2005). A study of preferences for sharing and privacy. CHI Tech Note.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Palen, L., Dourish, P. (2003). Privacy and trust: Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world. Proc. CHI. 129--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Pillsbury, R. (1987). From Hamburger Alley to Hedgerose Heights: Toward a Model of Restaurant Location Dynamics. The Professional Geographer v 39, Issue 3, 326--346.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Rettig, M. (1994). Prototyping for tiny fingers. Communications of the ACM, v 37, issue 4, 21--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Salter, C. (2003). How MapQuest Gets You From Here to There. FastCompany Magazine Issue 76. www.fastcompany.com/magazine/76/mapquest.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sherif, M., Murphy, G. (1936). The Psychology of Social Norms. Harper and Brother: New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Terry, M., Mynatt, E.D., Ryall, K., and Leigh, D. (2002). Social Net: Using Patterns of Physical Proximity over Time to Infer Shared Interests. Extended Abstracts of CHI 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Terveen, L. and McDonald, D. Social Matching: A Framework and Research Agenda. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12, 3 401--434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Tse, A., Sin, L., Yim, F. (2002). How a crowded restaurant affects consumers' attribution behavior. Intl. Journal of Hospitality Mgmt. 21, 449--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Capturing, sharing, and using local place information

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2007
      1654 pages
      ISBN:9781595935939
      DOI:10.1145/1240624

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 April 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate182of840submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader