skip to main content
10.1145/1274892.1274904acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Role-playing exercises to strengthen the resilience of command and control systems

Published:20 September 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe how role-playing exercises can be used to strengthen the resilience of command and control systems in emergency management. Through role-playing exercises, the participants gain experience with adapting to changing demands and risk relative to challenges to their ability to predict future risk, adapt, and recover from harmful events. Role-playing exercises at the same time enable researchers to analyse how resilient behaviour emerges, or how the resilience of complex socio-technical systems may be improved. Two role-playing exercises, one concerning forest fire fighting, the other concerning power grid restoration, are discussed to illustrate these concepts.

References

  1. Adamski, A. and Westrum, R. (2003). Requisite imagination. The fine art of anticipating what might go wrong. In E. Hollnagel (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task design (pp. 193--220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, D. (2000) Scenario methodology for teaching principles of emergency management. Disaster Prevention and Management, 9, 89--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Burgess, R. G. (1984). In the Field: An Introduction to Field Research. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, N. W. (1991). Disaster management: A disaster manager's handbook. Asian Development Bank.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Comfort, L. K., Sungu, Y., Johnson, D., and Dunn, M. (2001). Complex systems in crisis: Anticipation and resilience in dynamic environments. Journal of Crisis and Contingency Management, 9(3), 144--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Crichton, M. T., Flin, R. and Rattray, W. A. R. (2000). Training decision makers -- Tactical decision games. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 8(4), 208--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Crichton, M. and Flin, R. (2001). Training for emergency management. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 88, 254--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Dekker, S. W. A. (2005). Ten questions about human error: A new view of human factors and system safety. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Downs, C. W., Johnson, K. M. and Fallesen, J. J. (1987). Analysis of feedback in after action reviews (ARI Technical Report 745). U. S. Army Research Institute for Behavioural and Social Sciences (AD A188 336). Alexandria, VA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fleishman, E. A. & Zaccaro, S. J. (1992) Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions. In R. W. Swezey, & E. Salas (Eds.) Teams: Their Training and Performance (pp. 31--56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gestrelius, K. (1998). Simulering och utbildning: Upplevelsebaserad uppbyggnad av erfarenheter (3rd ed.). SAAB Training Systems. AB.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hannestad, S. E. (2005). Incident command system: A developing national standard of incident management in the U.S. Proceedings of the 2nd ISCRAM conference (Brussels, Belgium).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hills, A. (2000). Revisiting institutional resilience as a tool in crisis management. Journal of Crisis and Contingency Management, 8(2), 109--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hollnagel, E. (2000). Performance variability management. Proceedings of the People in Digitized Command and Control Symposium (Royal Military College of Science at Shrivenham, UK, 12--14 December 2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hollnagel, E. (2004). Barriers and accident prevention. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (Eds.). (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ikeda, Y., Beroggi, G. E. G. and Wallace, W. A. (1998). Supporting multi-group emergency management with multimedia. Safety Science, 30(1), 223--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jaiswal, N. K. (1997). Military operations research: Quantitative decision making. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Klein, J. H. and Cooper, D. F. (1982). Cognitive maps of decision-makers in a complex game. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 33(1), 63--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kaji, H., Matsumura, K., Kaneda, T., Kanegae, H., Ishibashi, K., Yahagi, M. and Mihira, J. (2005). Use of gaming for training emergency headquarters in responding to earthquake damage: EQRES/SAITAI -- Virtual earthquake responses., In R. Shiratori, K. Arai, and F. Kato (Eds.), Gaming, Simulations and Society: Research Scope and Perspective. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis, E. and Barlow, M. (2005). The use of games to investigate tactical decision-making. Proceedings of the SimTecT 05 (Sydney, Australia).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Persson, P-A. (2004). Toward an understanding of the service-based command system. Proceedings of the 9th ICCRTS Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (Monterey, CA).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Rankin, W. J., Gentner, F. C., and Crissey, M. J. (1995). After action review and debriefing methods: technique and technology. Proceedings of The 17th Interservice/Industry Training Systems and Education Conference (Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rubel, R. C. (2001). War-gaming network-centric warfare. Naval War College Review, 54(2), 61--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Thomas, L. C. (1984). Games, theory and applications. Courier Dover Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Trnka, J., Johansson, B. and Granlund, R. (2006). Information support in collaborative command and control work -- An empirical research using a role-playing exercise approach. Proceedings of the 11th ICCRTS - Int. Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (Cambridge, UK).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Trnka, J. and Jenvald, J. (2006). A real-time role-playing exercise as a methodology to support command and control research. Proceedings of the 3rd ISCRAM (Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management) (New Jersey Institute of technology, Newark, NJ, USA, 14--17 May 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Turoff, M., Chumer, M., Yao, X., Konopka, J. and Van de Walle, B. (2005). Crisis planning via scenario development gaming. Proceedings of the 2nd ISCRAM conference (Brussels, Belgium).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Waugh, W. L. (2000). Living with hazards, dealing with disasters: an introduction to emergency management., M. E. Sharpe.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Westrum, R. (2006). A typology of resilience situations. In E. Hollnagel, D. D. Woods, and N. Leveson, (Eds.), Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts (pp. 55--65). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wildavsky, A. (1988). Searching for safety. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Woltjer, R., Lindgren, I., and Smith, K. (in press). A case study of information and communication technology in emergency management training. International Journal of Emergency Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Woods, D. D. (2006). Essential characteristics of resilience. In E. Hollnagel, D. D. Woods, and N. Leveson, (Eds.), Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts (pp. 21--34). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ECCE '06: Proceedings of the 13th Eurpoean conference on Cognitive ergonomics: trust and control in complex socio-technical systems
    September 2006
    174 pages
    ISBN:9783906509235
    DOI:10.1145/1274892

    Copyright © 2006 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 20 September 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader