skip to main content
10.1145/1276318.1276358acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicailConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The legal crisis of next generation robots: on safety intelligence

Published:04 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Robot intelligence architecture has advanced from action intelligence to autonomous intelligence, whereby robots can adapt to complex environments and interact with humans. This technology, considered central to next generation robots (NGRs), will become increasingly visible in many human service scenarios in the next two decades. Accordingly, there is an emerging need to predict and address intertwined technological and legal issues that will arise once NGRs become more commonplace. Safety issues will be of particular interest from a legal viewpoint. As robots become more capable of autonomous behavior, regulations associated with industrial robots will no longer be effective. In this paper we will discuss issues associated with autonomous robot behavior regulations associated with the concept of safety intelligence (SI). We believe the SI concept (one of several robot sociability problems) is crucial to the development of "robot law" that will accompany the establishment of a society in which humans and robots co-exist.

References

  1. N. Tajika. The future astro boy. ASCOM, 2001 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Breazeal (2004). Social interactions in HRI: The robot view. IEEE Transactions on Man, Cybernetics and Systems-Part C, 34(2):181, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Y. Anzai. Next generation robots as real world-oriented media. Journal of Robotics Society of Japan, 16(1):15--18, 1998 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Robot Policy Council. Robot policy middle report, May 2005 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Asada and Y. Kuniyoshi. Robot intelligence. Iwanami, 2006 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Robotics Society of Japan Research Committee on Human Friendly Robots. Technical targets of human friendly robots. Journal of Robotics Society of Japan, 16(3):288--294, 1998 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Next Generation Robot Vision Seminar. Toward 2025 Human-Robot Co-Existence Society Report, Apr. 2004 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Robotics Industry Development Council. Founders' statement. http://www.f-robot.com/tokku/tokku.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Robot Policy Council. Robot Policy Council Report, May 2006 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Y. Ishida, A. Neudorfer, K. Futsuhara, and T. Fujita. Importance of inherent safety in human machine interface environment. Report of the Human Interface Society (Japan) Interface Symposium, 2002 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. T. Ojima, S. Hashimoto, and K. Yabuno. The book of Wabot 2. Chuokoron-Shinsha, 2003 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H. A. Simon. The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). MIT Press, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Lyons. Open texture and the possibility of legal interpretation. Law and Philosophy, 18(3):297--309, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. I. Asimov. I, Robot. Doubleday, 1950.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. A. Fodor. (1987). Modules, frames, fridgeons, sleeping dogs and the music of the spheres. In Z. Pylyshyn (ed.), The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. Ablex Publishers, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TextualistGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Hirose. A robot dialog. Journal of Japan Robotics Society, 7(4):121--126, 1989 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. R. A. Brooks. Flesh and machines: How robots will change us. Eurasian Publishing, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. Kurogawa. Nonverbal Interface. Ohmsha, 1994 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. Sugano and K. Shibuya. Anthropomorphic robots for nonverbal communication. Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, 15(7): 975--978, 1997 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. H. Aldsersey-Williams. Zoomorphic: New animal architecture. Laurence King Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. "Japanese robots will change the world" (unsigned editorial). Yazhou Zhoukan: 14--23, March 25, 2002 (in Chinese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Tachi. How to construct future society: Tele-remote controlled robots. Meme No. 4, Fuji Research Institute Corporation, Apr. 2003 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. The legal crisis of next generation robots: on safety intelligence

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICAIL '07: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
          June 2007
          302 pages
          ISBN:9781595936806
          DOI:10.1145/1276318
          • Conference Chair:
          • Anne Gardner,
          • Program Chair:
          • Radboud Winkels

          Copyright © 2007 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 June 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate69of169submissions,41%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader