skip to main content
10.1145/1278480.1278655acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Analysis and optimization of sleep modes in subthreshold circuit design

Published:04 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Subthreshold operation is a promising method for reducing power consumption in ultra-low power applications, such as active RFIDs and sensor networks. It was shown in previous works that operating at the Vmin supply voltage results in optimal energy operation, where Vmin typically falls below the threshold voltage. However, all previous subthreshold analyses ignore the leakage current in standby mode. Hence, for applications where operation at Vmin results in completion of the task well ahead of the required deadline, the energy consumption can be significantly under-estimated. In this paper, we investigate the effect of the non-zero standby energy on the optimal energy consumption in subthreshold operation. We first analyze energy consumption both with and without a cutoff technique in standby mode. Two parameters are proposed to capture the cutoff structure's effect on the energy consumption. Second, a methodology to minimize the total energy consumption is addressed. The selection of the cutoff structure is examined by comparing three different structures. Then, a co-optimization method to optimize the size of the cutoff structure concurrently with the supply voltage, is proposed. This approach reduces energy by 99.2% compared to standby-energy-unaware optimization.

References

  1. B. Zhai, D. Blaauw, D. Sylvester, K. Flautner, "Theoretical and Practical Limits of Dynamic Voltage Scaling", DAC, pp. 868--873, June, 2004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. Calhoun, A. Chandrakasan, "Characterizing and modeling minimum energy operation for subthreshold circuits", ISLPED, no.3, pp.90--95, Aug 2004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Wang, A. Chandrakasan, "A 180-mV subthreshold FFT processor using a minimum energy design methodology", IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol.40, no.1, pp.310--319, Jan 2005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. B. Zhai, L. Nazhadili, J. Olson, A Reeves, M Minuth, R Helfand, S. Pant, D. Blaauw, T. Austin, "A 2.60pJ/Inst Subthreshold Sensor Processor for Optimal Energy Efficiency", Symp. On VLSI Circuits, pp. 154--155, 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. L. Nazhadili, M. Minuth, T. Austin, "SenseBench: toward an accurate evaluation of sensor network processors", Workload Characterization Symposium, pp. 197--203, Oct, 2005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Chung, E. Hong, K. Kim, S. Cho, "Optimum Supply Voltage and Sleep Transistor Sizing for Energy Minimization in Latency-Constrained MTCMOS Circuits", International Symposium on System-On-Chip, pp.365--368, Nov, 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Kao, A. Chandrakasan, D. Antoniadis, "Transistor Sizing Issue and Tool for Multi-Threshold CMOS Technology", DAC, pp. 409--414, June, 1997 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. B. C. Paul, A. Raychowdhury, K. Roy, "Device optimization for digital subthreshold logic operation," IEEE Trans. Elect. Devices, pp. 237--247, Feb, 2005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. T. Kim, H. Eom, J. Keane, and C. Kim, "Utilizing Reverse Short Channel Effect for Optimal Subthreshold Circuit Design," International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, Oct, 2006 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Analysis and optimization of sleep modes in subthreshold circuit design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DAC '07: Proceedings of the 44th annual Design Automation Conference
      June 2007
      1016 pages
      ISBN:9781595936271
      DOI:10.1145/1278480

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 June 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      DAC '07 Paper Acceptance Rate152of659submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      DAC '24
      61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
      June 23 - 27, 2024
      San Francisco , CA , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader