skip to main content
article

Localization using boundary sensors: An analysis based on graph theory

Published:01 October 2007Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We consider sensors, such as fibers, lasers, and pyroelectric motion detectors, that fire when objects cross a boundary. A moving object can be localized by analyzing sequences of boundary crossings. We consider the number of distinct sequences and object positions that can be achieved using boundary sensors in one- and two-dimensional spaces. For 1D systems we use representations of sensor sequences on graphs to derive limits on the number of object locations that can be monitored by a given sensor population and sequence length. For 2D systems we show that in certain circumstances the ratio of the number of unique sensor sequences to the number of unique object paths is exponential in the sequence length and we argue that the probability of unique identification is high for sufficiently large sequences. We also prove the triangle grid can track an object with error limited to a small neighborhood.

References

  1. Aigner, M. and Ziegler, G. M. 1998. Proofs from the Book. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellutta, P., Ancona, N., and Poggio, T. 1991. A floor boundary sensor for autonomous robot navigation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollobas, B. 1979. Graph Theory: An Introductory Course. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Chung, F. R. K. 1997. Spectral Graph Theory. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Clouqueur, T., Phipatanasuphorn, V., Ramanathan, P., and Saluja, K. K. 2003. Sensor deployment strategy for detection of targets traversing a region. Mob. Netw. Appl. 8, 4, 453--461. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. de Bruijn, N. and van Aardenne-Ehrenfest, T. 1951. Circuits and trees in oriented linear graphs. Simon Stevin 28, 203--217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dougherty, B. C., Bunch, R. M., Lukens, R. E., Nagel, J., and Wolfe, W. L. 2004. Passive infrared device for detection of boundary crossings. United States Patent Application 20040129883.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gopinathan, U., Brady, D. J., and Pitsianis, N. P. 2003. Coded apertures for efficient pyroelectric motion tracking. Optics Express 11, 18, 2142--2152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Harary, F. 1994. Graph Theory. Addison-Wesley, 376--379.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang, C.-F. and Tseng, Y.-C. 2003. The coverage problem in a wireless sensor network. In ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lucas, E. 1891. Recreations Mathematiques. Gauthier-Villares, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Meguerdichian, S., Koushanfar, F., Potkonjak, M., and Srivastava, M. 2001a. Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of INFOCOM. 1380--1387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Meguerdichian, S., Koushanfar, F., Qu, G., and Potkonjak, M. 2001b. Exposure in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of MOBICOM. 139--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Meguerdichian, S., Slijepcevic, S., Karayan, V., and Potkonjak, M. 2001c. Localized algorithms in wireless ad-hoc networks: Location discovery and sensor exposure. In Proceedings of MOBIHOC. 106--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Potuluri, P., Gopinathan, U., Adleman, J. R., and Brady, D. J. 2003. Lensless sensor system using a reference structure. Optics Express 11, 8, 965--974.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Smith, C. and Tutte, W. 1941. On unicursal paths in a network of degree 4. Amer. Math. Month. 48, 233--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Tian, D. and Georganas, N. D. 2002. A coverage-preserving node scheduling scheme for large wireless sensor networks. In ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ye, F., Zhong, G., Lu, S., and Zhang, L. 2003. A robust energy conserving protocol for long-lived sensor networks. In International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Zahnd, S., Lichtsteiner, P., and Delbruck, T. 2003. Integrated vision sensor for detecting boundary crossings. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. 376--379.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zheng, Y., Brady, D. J., Sullivan, M. E., and Guenther, B. 2005. Fiber optical localization by geometric space coding with 2d gray code. Appl. Optics 44, 20, 4306--4314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Zheng, Y., Pitsianis, N. P., and Brady, D. J. 2006. A fiber sensor floor web for multi-person tracking. IEEE Sensor J. To appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Localization using boundary sensors: An analysis based on graph theory

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader