skip to main content
10.1145/1287748.1287755acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Proactive traffic merging strategies for sensor-enabled cars

Published:10 September 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Congestion is a major challenge in today's road traffic. This paper addresses the issue of how to optimize traffic throughput on highways, in particular for intersections where a ramp leads onto the highway. In our work we assume that cars are equipped with sensors: they can detect the distance to the neighboring cars and communicate their velocity and acceleration among each other. We present proactive traffic control algorithms for merging different streams of sensor-enabled cars into a single stream. The main idea of a proactive merging algorithm is to decouple the decision point from the actual merging point. Sensor-enabled cars allow us to decide where and when a car merges before it arrives at the actual merging point. This leads to a significant throughput improvement for the traffic as the speed can be adjusted proactively. Sensor-enabled cars can locally exchange sensed information about the traffic and adapt their behavior much earlier than regular cars. We compare the traffic merging algorithms against a conventional priority-based merging algorithm in a controlled simulation environment. We show that proactive merging algorithms outperform the priority-based merging algorithm in terms of throughput and delay. Our experiments demonstrate that the traffic throughput can be increased by up to 200% and the delay can be reduced by 30%.

References

  1. GM develops vehicles with a sixth sense. http://www.automotoportal.com/article/gm-develops-vehicles-with-a-sixth-sense, last accessed: July 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci. Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer Networks, 38(4):393--422, March 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Anda, J. LeBrun, C-N. Chuah, D. Ghosal, and H. M. Zhang. VGrid: Vehicular ad hoc networking and computing grid for intelligent traffic control. In Proc. IEEE VTC 2005-Spring, volume 5, pages 2905--2909, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. Antoniotti, A. Deshpande, and A. Girault. Microsimulation analysis of automated vehicles on multiple merge junction highways. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pages 839--844, Orlando, FL, U.S.A., October 12-15, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Bose and P. A. Ioannou. Analysis of traffic flow with mixed manual and semiautomated vehicles. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst., 4(4):173--188, December 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Chen, Z. Jia, and P. Varaiya. Causes and cures of highway congestion. IEEE Control Syst. Mag., 21(6):26--32, December 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. European Commission. White paper - European transport policy for 2010: Time to decide, 2001. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/white_paper/index_en.htm, last accessed: July 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Cowan. The uncontrolled traffic merge. J. Appl. Prob., 16:384--392, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. L. C. Davis. Effect of adaptive cruise control systems on mixed traffic flow near an on-ramp, June 2005. http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0506147, last accessed: July 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. ElBatt, S. K. Goel, G. Holland, H. Krishnan, and J. Parikh. Safety: Cooperative collision warning using dedicated short range wireless communications. In Proc. VANET '06, pages 30--39, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. W. J. Fleming. Overview of automotive sensors. IEEE Sens. J., 1(4):296--308, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. Kato and S. Tsugawa. Cooperative driving of autonomous vehicles based on localization, inter-vehicle communications and vision systems. JSAE Review, 22(4):503--509, October 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Kesting, M. Treiber, M. Schonhof, F. Kranke, and D. Helbing. Jam-avoiding adaptive cruise control (ACC) and its impact on traffic dynamics, 2006. http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0601/0601096v1.pdf, last accessed: July 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. L. Li, J. Song, F. Y. Wang, W. Niehsen, and N. N. Zheng. IVS 05: New developments and research trends for intelligent vehicles. IEEE Intell. Syst., 20(4):10--14, Jul-Aug 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. X. Y. Lu, H. S. Tan, S. E. Shladover, and J. K. Hedrick. Automated vehicle merging maneuver implementation for AHS. Vehicle Syst. Dyn., 41(2):85--107, February 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Papageorgiou and A. Kotsialos. Freeway ramp metering: an overview. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst., 3(4):271--281, December 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. E. Russell, C. A. Drubin, A. S. Marinilli, and W. G. Woodington. Integrated automotive sensors. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 50(3):674--677, March 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. D. Schrank and T. Lomax. 2005 annual urban mobility report, 2005. http://mobility.tamu.edu/ums/, last accessed: July 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Treiber and D. Helbing. Microsimulations of freeway traffic including control measures, October 04 2002. http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0210096.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Treiber, A. Hennecke, and D. Helbing. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys. Rev. E, 62(2):1805--1824, August 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. P. Varaiya. Smart cars on smart roads: Problems of control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 38(2):195--207, February 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Q. Xu and R. Sengupta. Simulation, analysis, and comparison of ACC and CACC in highway merging control. In Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pages 237--242, June 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Proactive traffic merging strategies for sensor-enabled cars

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          VANET '07: Proceedings of the fourth ACM international workshop on Vehicular ad hoc networks
          September 2007
          90 pages
          ISBN:9781595937391
          DOI:10.1145/1287748

          Copyright © 2007 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 September 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate26of64submissions,41%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader