skip to main content
10.1145/1288580.1288585acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Attitudes towards computer science-computing experiences as a starting point and barrier to computer science

Published: 15 September 2007 Publication History

Abstract

In which way do computing experiences shape attitudes towards computer science? Why do they foster some students' commitment to the subject while they deter others? By using a qualitative research approach we observed that computing experiences have impacts on several dimensions: They affect the self-image with regard to computing, the world-image with regard to conceptions of the subject, and habits in computing. We determined different perceptions of computing (summarized as: use, professional use and design), which together with attitudes (attributions and concepts) of the field enable or inhibit pathways into the field.

References

[1]
Adams, J. and Bauer, V. and Baichoo, S. (2003). An expanding pipeline: gender in Mauritius. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 59--63.
[2]
Beaubouef, T. (2003). Why computer science students need language. In ACM SIGCSE Bull. 35(4): 51--54.
[3]
Beaubouef, T. and Mason, J. (2005). Why the high attrition rate for computer science students: some thoughts and observations. In ACM SIGCSE Bull. 37(2): 103--106.
[4]
Böhm, A. (2004). Theoretical Coding: Text Analysis in Grounded Theory. In Flick, U., von Kardoff, E. and Steinke, I. (edit.): A Companion to Qualitative Research. Sage Publications Ltd, 270--275.
[5]
Byrne, P. and Lyons, G. (2001). The effect of student attributes on success in programming. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 49--52.
[6]
Camp, T. (2002). The incredible shrinking pipeline. In ACM SIGCSE Bull. 34(2): 129--134.
[7]
Carter, L. (2006). Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 27--31.
[8]
Cohoon, J. McGrath and Aspray, W. (2006). A Critical Review of the Research on Women's Participation in Postsecondary Computing Education. In Cohoon, J. McGrath and Aspray, W. (edit.): Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation. MIT Press, 137--180.
[9]
Cohoon, J. McGrath and Aspray, W. (2006). Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation. MIT Press.
[10]
Computer-Biographies. Webpage of the research project: https://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/w/DDI/ComputerBiographies.
[11]
Crutzen, C. K. M. (2000). Interaction, a world of differences. A vision on informatics from the perspective of gender studies, http://www.cecile-crutzen.de/Downloads/ 2000-Dissertatie-English-Summary.pdf, Open Universiteit Nederland Heerlen.
[12]
Donovan, M. S. (2005). How students learn. History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[13]
Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Ratcliffe, M., Sanders, K., and Zander, C. (2006). Putting threshold concepts into context in computer science education. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 103--107.
[14]
Faulstich-Wieland, H. (2004). Mädchen und Naturwissenschaften in der Schule, Expertise für das Landesinstitut für Lehrerbildung und Schulentwicklung. Hamburg.
[15]
Goode, J., Estrella, R., Margolis, J. (2006). Lost in translation: Gender and High School Computer Science. In Cohoon, J. McGrath and Aspray, W. (edit.): Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation. MIT Press, 89--114.
[16]
Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. In Educational Psychology Review 3(1): 5--39.
[17]
Greening, T. (1998). Computer science: through the eyes of potential students. In Proceedings of the 3rd Australasian Conference on Computer Science Education, ACSE, 145--154.
[18]
Grotlueschen, A. and Root, M. (2003). Klaus Holzkamp's Learning Theory & School Criticism. www.erzwiss.unihamburg.de/personal/grotlueschen/2004/pdf/AG_Holzkamp_englisch.pdf
[19]
Guzdial, M. and Soloway, E. (2002). Teaching the Nintendo generation to program. In Commun. ACM 45(4): 17--21.
[20]
Heublein, U., Schmelzer, R., Sommer, D. et. al. (2005). Studienabbruchstudie 2005. HIS: Hochschul-Informations-System (The Higher Education Information System), http://www.bmbf.de/pub/studienabbruchstudie_2005.pdf.
[21]
Knobelsdorf, M. and Schulte, C. (2005). Computer Biographies - A Biographical Research Perspective on Computer Usage and Attitudes Toward Informatics. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Finnish / Baltic Sea Conference on Computer Science Education, Koli.
[22]
Knobelsdorf, M. and Schulte, C. (2007). Das informatische Weltbild von Studierenden. In Proceedings of the 12th GIFachtagung Informatik und Schule, INFOS 2007.
[23]
Ladd, B. C. (2006). The curse of Monkey Island: holding the attention of students weaned on computer games. J. In Comput. Small Coll. 21(6): 162--174.
[24]
Maaβ, S. and Wiesner, H. (2006). Programmieren, Mathe und ein bisschen Hardware.Wen lockt dies Bild der Informatik? In Informatik Spektrum 29(1): 125--132.
[25]
Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MIT Press.
[26]
Marotzki, W. (2004). Qualitative Biographical Research. In Flick, U., von Kardoff, E. and Steinke, I. (edit.): A Companion to Qualitative Research. Sage Publications Ltd, 101--107.
[27]
Martin, C. D. (2004) Draw a computer scientist. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 11--12.
[28]
McGuffee, J.W. (2000) Defining Computer Science. In ACM SIGCSE Bull. 32(2): 74--76.
[29]
Moorman, P. and Johnson, E. (2003). Still a stranger here: attitudes among secondary school students towards computer science In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 193--197.
[30]
Murphy, L., Richards, B., McCauley, R., Morrison, B. B., Westbrook, S., and Fossum, T. (2006). Women catch up: gender differences in learning programming concepts. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 17--21.
[31]
Romeike, R. and Schwill, A. (2005). Das Studium könnte zu schwierig für mich sein - Langzeitbefragung zur Studienwahl Informatik am Institut für Informatik der Universität Potsdam. Institut für Informatik der Universität Potsdam.
[32]
Rowling, J. K. (1999). Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. Bloomsbury Publishing.
[33]
Schinzel, B. (1993). Zur Gleichstellung von Frauen und Männern in der Informatik: Curriculare Vorschläge. In Infotech (5)4.
[34]
Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The "Warming Trend" in Conceptual Change Research: The Legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. In EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST 40(2): 107--115.
[35]
Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland (Federal Statistical Office Germany). (2005). Hochschulstandort Deutschland 2005. http://www.destatis.de/presse/deutsch/pk/2005/aktuelle_ergebnisse.pdf.
[36]
Teague, J. (2002). Women in computing: what brings them to it, what keeps them in it? In ACM SIGCSE Bull. 34(2): 147--158.
[37]
Tiefel, S. (2005). Coding in terms of Grounded Theory: modifying coding guidelines for the analysis of biographical learning within a theoretical framework of learning and education. In ZBBS: Zeitschrift für qualitative Bildungs-, Beratungs- und Sozialforschung 6(1): 65--84.
[38]
Turkle, S. (2005). The second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. The MIT Press.
[39]
Turner, E. H. and Turner, R. M. (2005). Teaching entering students to think like computer scientists. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 307--311.
[40]
Vegso, J. (2005). Interest in cs as a major drop among incoming freshmen. In Computing Research News 17(3): 126--140.
[41]
Wiedenbeck, S. (2005). Factors affecting the success of nonmajors in learning to program. In Proceedings of the 2005 international Workshop on Computing Education Research, ICER, 13--24.
[42]
Wilson, B. C. and Shrock, S. (2001). Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors. In Proceedings of the 32th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 184--188.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Students' Motivation and Intention to Engage with Data-Driven Technologies from a CS Perspective in Everyday LifeProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653625(646-652)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Learning an Explanatory Model of Data-Driven Technologies can Lead to Empowered Behavior: A Mixed-Methods Study in K-12 Computing EducationProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671118(326-342)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Developing and Validating a Scale on Subjective Factors Affecting Retention of Underrepresented Computer Science Undergrads2024 Black Issues in Computing Education (BICE)10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00010(8-14)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Attitudes towards computer science-computing experiences as a starting point and barrier to computer science

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICER '07: Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research
      September 2007
      172 pages
      ISBN:9781595938411
      DOI:10.1145/1288580
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 15 September 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. CS
      2. CS Ed research
      3. attribution
      4. computer biographies
      5. computers and society
      6. conceptual change
      7. gender
      8. pedagogy
      9. transition
      10. use - professional use - design
      11. wider access

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Conference

      ICER07
      Sponsor:
      ICER07: International Computing Education Research Workshop
      September 15 - 16, 2007
      Georgia, Atlanta, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      ICER '07 Paper Acceptance Rate 14 of 24 submissions, 58%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 189 of 803 submissions, 24%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICER 2025
      ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
      August 3 - 6, 2025
      Charlottesville , VA , USA

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)73
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
      Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Students' Motivation and Intention to Engage with Data-Driven Technologies from a CS Perspective in Everyday LifeProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653625(646-652)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Learning an Explanatory Model of Data-Driven Technologies can Lead to Empowered Behavior: A Mixed-Methods Study in K-12 Computing EducationProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671118(326-342)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Developing and Validating a Scale on Subjective Factors Affecting Retention of Underrepresented Computer Science Undergrads2024 Black Issues in Computing Education (BICE)10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00010(8-14)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
      • (2024)The impact of near-peer virtual agents on computer science attitudes and collaborative dialogueInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.10064640(100646)Online publication date: Jun-2024
      • (2023)Understanding the Impact of Peer Instruction in CS Principles Teacher Professional DevelopmentACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/358507723:2(1-21)Online publication date: 17-Apr-2023
      • (2023)Leveraging Computational Science Students' Coding Strengths for Mathematics LearningProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569861(263-269)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
      • (2023)Foundations of Computer Science in General Teacher Education – Findings and Experiences from a Blended-Learning CourseTowards a Collaborative Society Through Creative Learning10.1007/978-3-031-43393-1_36(389-399)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2023
      • (2022)The Role of Self-Efficacy in Fostering a Sense of Belonging in Computing EducationUsing Self-Efficacy for Improving Retention and Success of Diverse Student Populations10.4018/978-1-6684-5039-0.ch011(222-246)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2022
      • (2022)Student experiences in a university preparatory programming courseFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2022.9832374Online publication date: 12-Dec-2022
      • (2022)Exploring the Influence of Demographic Factors on Progression and Playtime in Educational GamesProceedings of the 17th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games10.1145/3555858.3555873(1-15)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media