Article

Through the eyes of instructors: a phenomenographic investigation of student success

Authors:

Päivi Kinnunen,

Robert McCartney,

Lynda ThomasAuthors Info & Claims

ICER '07: Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research

Pages 61 - 72

https://doi.org/10.1145/1288580.1288589

Published: 15 September 2007 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we present a phenomenographic analysis of computer science instructors' perceptions of student success. The factors instructors believe influence student success fell into five categories which were related to: 1) the subject being taught, 2) intrinsic characteristics of the student, 3) student background, 4) student attitudes and behaviour and 5) instructor influence on student development. These categories provide insights not only into how instructors perceive students, but also how they perceive their own roles in the learning process. We found significant overlap between these qualitative results, obtained through analysis of semi-structured interviews, and the vast body of quantitative research on factors predicting student success. Studying faculty rather than students provides an alternative way to examine these questions, and using qualitative methods may provide a richer understanding of student success factors.

References

[1]

M. Ben-Ari. Constructivism in computer science education. In SIGCSE '98: Proc. of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE technical symposium on Comp. sci. educ., pages 257--261, 1998.

Digital Library

[2]

J. Bennedsen and M. Caspersen. An investigation of potential success factors for an introductory model-driven programming course. In Proc. of the 1st Intl. Computing Education Research Workshop (ICER 2005), pages 155--164, 2005.

Digital Library

[3]

J. Bennedsen and M. E. Caspersen. Abstraction ability as an indicator of success for learning object-oriented programming? SIGCSE Bull., 38(2):39--43, 2006.

Digital Library

[4]

S. Bergin and R. Reilly. Programming: factors that influence success. SIGCSE Bull., 37(1):411--415, 2005.

Digital Library

[5]

S. Bergin, R. Reilly, and D. Traynor. Examining the role of self-regulated learning on introductory programming performance. In ICER '05: Proc. of the 2005 Intl. workshop on Computing education research, pages 81--86, 2005.

Digital Library

[6]

A. Berglund and M. Wiggberg. Students learn CS in different ways: insights from an empirical study. In ITICSE '06: Proc. of the 11th annual SIGCSE conf. on Innovation and technology in comp. sci. education, pages 265--269, 2006.

Digital Library

[7]

J. Biggs. What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1):57--75, 1999.

[8]

C. Bishop-Clark and D. D. Wheeler. The Myers-Briggs personality type and its relationship to computer programming. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2):358--371, Spring 1994.

[9]

R. Boyle, J. Carter, and M. Clark. What Makes Them Succeed? Entry, progression and graduation in Computer Science. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(1):3--18, 2002.

[10]

P. Byrne and G. Lyons. The effect of student attributes on success in programming. In ITiCSE '01: Proc. of the 6th annual conf. on Innovation and technology in comp. sci. education, pages 49--52, 2001.

Digital Library

[11]

S. Dehnadi and R. Bornat. The camel has two humps (working title). Draft paper. Retrieved at http://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/research/PhDArea/saeed/paper1.pdf, 2/23/07, February 2006.

[12]

E. Dijkstra. On the cruelty of really teaching computer science. Commun. ACM, 32(12):1398--1404, 1989.

[13]

A. Eckerdal and A. Berglund. What does it take to learn 'programming thinking'? In Proc. of the 1st Intl. Computing Education Research Workshop (ICER 2005), pages 135--143, 2005.

Digital Library

[14]

A. Eckerdal and M. Thuné. Novice java programmers' conceptions of "object" and "class", and variation theory. In ITiCSE '05: Proc. of the 10th annual SIGCSE conf. on Innovation and technology in comp. sci. education, pages 89--93, 2005.

Digital Library

[15]

D. Fox. Personal theories of teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 8(2):151--163, 1983.

[16]

A. Goold and R. Rimmer. Factors affecting performance in first-year computing. SIGCSE Bull., 32(2):39--43, 2000.

Digital Library

[17]

O. Hazzan. How Students Attempt to Reduce Abstraction in the Learning of Mathematics and in the Learning of Computer Science. Computer Science Education, 13(2):95--122, June 2003.

[18]

B. Johnson and L. Christensen. Educational Research. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Pearson, Boston, 2004.

[19]

P. Kansanen. Teaching as teaching-studying-learning interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(1):81--89, 1999.

[20]

P. Kansanen. Studying -- the realistic bridge between instruction and learning. an attempt to a conceptual whole of the teaching-studying-learning process. Educational Studies, 29(2/3):221--232, 2003.

[21]

P. Kansanen and M. Meri. The didactic relation in the teaching-studying-learning process. In B. Hudson, F. Buchberger, P. Kansanen, and H. Seel, editors, Didaktik/Fachdidaktik as Science(-s)of the Teaching profession, pages 107--116. TNTEE Publications, 1999.

[22]

J. Kramer. Is abstraction the key to computing? Commun. of the ACM, 50(4):36--42, 2007.

Digital Library

[23]

R. Lister, A. Berglund, I. Box, C. Cope, A. Pears, C. Avram, M. Bower, A. Carbone, B. Davey, M. de Raadt, B. Doyle, S. Fitzgerald, L. Mannila, C. Kutay, M. Peltomaki, J. Sheard, Simon, K. Sutton, D. Traynor, J. Tutty, and A. Venables. Differing ways that computing academics understand teaching. In Proc. of the Ninth Australasian Comp. Educ. Conf. (ACE2007), 2007.

Digital Library

[24]

R. Lister, I. Box, B. Morrison, J. Tenenberg, and D. S. Westbrook. The dimensions of variation in the teaching of data structures. In ITiCSE '04: Proc. of the 9th annual SIGCSE conf. on Innovation and technology in comp. sci. education, pages 92--96, 2004.

Digital Library

[25]

R. Mancy and N. Reid. Aspects of cognitive style and programming. In E. Dunican and T. Green, editors, Proc. of the 16th Workshop of the Psycology of Programming Interest Group, pages 1--9, 2004.

[26]

F. Marton and S. Booth. Learning and Awareness. Lawrence Erbaum Assoc., Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1997.

[27]

L. Murphy, B. Richards, R. McCauley, B. B. Morrison, S. Westbrook, and T. Fossum. Women catch up: gender differences in learning programming concepts. In SIGCSE '06: Proc. of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Comp. sci. educ., pages 17--21, 2006.

Digital Library

[28]

B. T. Pioro. Introductory computer programming: gender, major, discrete mathematics, and calculus. J. Comput. Small Coll., 21(5):123--129, 2006.

Digital Library

[29]

A. Robins, J. Rountree, and N. Rountree. Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion. Computer Science Education, 13(2):137--172, 2003.

[30]

N. Rountree, J. Rountree, A. Robins, and R. Hannah. Interacting factors that predict success and failure in a CS1 course. SIGCSE Bull., 36(4):101--104, 2004.

Digital Library

[31]

C. Schulte and J. Magenheim. Novices' expectations and prior knowledge of software development: results of a study with high school students. In Proc. of the 1st Intl. Computing Education Research Workshop (ICER 2005), pages 143--153, 2005.

Digital Library

[32]

Simon, S. Fincher, A. Robins, B. Baker, I. Box, Q. Cutts, M. de Raadt, P. Haden, J. Hamer, M. Hamilton, R. Lister, M. Petre, K. Sutton, D. Tolhurst, and J. Tutty. Predictors of success in a first programming course. In ACE '06: Proc. of the 8th Austalian conf. on Comp. educ., pages 189--196, 2006.

Digital Library

[33]

H. G. Taylor and L. C. Moundfield. Exploration of the relationship between prior computing experience and gender on success in college computer science. Educational Computing Research, 11(4):291--306, 1994.

[34]

L. Thomas, M. Ratcliffe, J. Woodbury, and E. Jarman. Learning styles and performance in the introductory programming sequence. In SIGCSE '02: Proc. of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Comp. sci. educ., pages 33--37, 2002.

Digital Library

[35]

S. Turkle and S. Papert. Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11:3--33, 1992.

[36]

P. Ventura and B. Ramamurthy. Wanted: CS1 students. no experience required. SIGCSE Bull., 36(1):240--244, 2004.

Digital Library

[37]

P. R. Ventura. Identifying Predictors of Success for an Objects-First CS1. Computer Science Education, 15(3):223--243, 2005.

[38]

S. Wiedenbeck. Factors affecting the success of non-majors in learning to program. In Proc. of the 1st Intl. Computing Education Research Workshop (ICER 2005), pages 13--24, 2005.

Digital Library

[39]

B. C. Wilson. A study of factors promoting success in computer science including gender differences. Computer Science Education, 12(1-2):141--164, 2002.

[40]

B. C. Wilson and S. Shrock. Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors. SIGCSE Bull., 33(1):184--188, 2001.

Digital Library

[41]

J. M. Wolfe. Perspectives on testing for programming aptitude. In Proc. of the 1971 26th annual conf., pages 268--277, 1971.

Digital Library

[42]

M. Xenos, C. Pierrakeas, and P. Pintelas. A survey on student dropout rates and dropout causes concerning the students in the Course of Informatics of the Hellenic Open University. Computers & Education, 39:361--194, 2002.

[43]

G. S. Åkerlind. Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4):321--334, 2005.

Cited By

Flores PRivas ITorres J(2023)Difficulties in Object-Oriented Design and its relationship with Abstraction: A Systematic Review of LiteratureProceedings of the 4th European Symposium on Software Engineering10.1145/3651640.3651643(1-13)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3651640.3651643
Riese EBälter O(2022)A Qualitative Study of Experienced Course Coordinators’ Perspectives on Assessment in Introductory Programming Courses for Non-CS MajorsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/351713422:4(1-29)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3517134
Navickiene VDagiene VJasute EButkiene RGudoniene D(2021)Pandemic-Induced Qualitative Changes in the Process of University Studies from the Perspective of University AuthoritiesSustainability10.3390/su1317988713:17(9887)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179887
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Through the eyes of instructors: a phenomenographic investigation of student success
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education

Recommendations

A phenomenographic approach on teacher conceptions of teaching Artificial Intelligence (AI) in K-12 schools
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) education for K-12 students is an emerging necessity, owing to the rapid advancement and deployment of AI technologies. It is essential to take teachers’ perspectives into account when creating ecologically valid AI ...
Students’ Experience of Participation in a Discipline—A Longitudinal Study of Computer Science and IT Engineering Students

This article concludes a longitudinal study with the broader aim to explore learner development as a long-term, social process. One goal has been to inform the endeavours of improving student engagement, retention, as well as under-representation of ...
Learning Computer Science: Dimensions of Variation Within What Chinese Students Learn

We know from research that there is an intimate relationship between student learning and the context of learning. What is not known or understood well enough is the relationship of the students’ background and previous studies to the understanding and ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ICER '07: Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research

September 2007

172 pages

ISBN:9781595938411

DOI:10.1145/1288580

General Chairs:
Richard Anderson
University of Washington, Seattle, WA
,
Sally Fincher
University of Kent at Canterbury, UK
,
Mark Guzdial
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA

Copyright © 2007 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 September 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

ICER07

Sponsor:

ICER07: International Computing Education Research Workshop

September 15 - 16, 2007

Georgia, Atlanta, USA

Acceptance Rates

ICER '07 Paper Acceptance Rate 14 of 24 submissions, 58%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 189 of 803 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

ICER 2025

Sponsor:
sigcse

ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research

August 3 - 6, 2025

Charlottesville , VA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

65
Total Citations
View Citations
836
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)3
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Flores PRivas ITorres J(2023)Difficulties in Object-Oriented Design and its relationship with Abstraction: A Systematic Review of LiteratureProceedings of the 4th European Symposium on Software Engineering10.1145/3651640.3651643(1-13)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3651640.3651643
Riese EBälter O(2022)A Qualitative Study of Experienced Course Coordinators’ Perspectives on Assessment in Introductory Programming Courses for Non-CS MajorsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/351713422:4(1-29)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3517134
Navickiene VDagiene VJasute EButkiene RGudoniene D(2021)Pandemic-Induced Qualitative Changes in the Process of University Studies from the Perspective of University AuthoritiesSustainability10.3390/su1317988713:17(9887)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179887
Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė ŽValantinaitė IKliukas R(2021)Communion, Care, and Leadership in Computer-Mediated Learning during the Early Stage of COVID-19Sustainability10.3390/su1308423413:8(4234)Online publication date: 10-Apr-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084234
Lorås MSindre GTrætteberg HAalberg T(2021)Study Behavior in Computing Education—A Systematic Literature ReviewACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/346912922:1(1-40)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3469129
Nachatar Singh J(2020)Challenges in obtaining employment in China: Lived experiences of Australian Chinese graduatesAustralian Journal of Career Development10.1177/103841622094708529:3(153-163)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2020
https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416220947085
Malmi LSheard JKinnunen PSimon Sinclair J(2020)Computing education theoriesACM Inroads10.1145/338188911:1(54-64)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3381889
Adamopoulos F(2020)Learning Programming, Student MotivationEncyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_182(1058-1067)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_182
Griffin JCarter JBecker BBrown N(2019)Designing Intentional Bugs for LearningProceedings of the 2019 Conference on United Kingdom & Ireland Computing Education Research10.1145/3351287.3351289(1-7)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3351287.3351289
Malmi LSheard JKinnunen PSimon Sinclair JMcCartney RPetersen ARobins AMoskal AMcCartney RRobins A(2019)Computing Education TheoriesProceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research10.1145/3291279.3339409(187-197)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3291279.3339409
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten