skip to main content
10.1145/1292491.1292503acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Providing a holistic perspective to evaluating e-service quality in web-based systems: a multi-stakeholder approach

Published:02 October 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over a period spanning approximately twenty five years IS researchers have been plagued by the problem of how to evaluate IS effectiveness or success. After the advent of the WWW in the 1990s, questions have arisen regarding the relevance of previously established evaluation approaches to the evaluation of web-based IS. In this paper, we describe a holistic approach to Information Systems (IS) evaluation, focusing on web-based applications. In this context, a holistic perspective refers to a multi-stakeholder evaluation regarding perceptions of IS Success. The paper presents the results of a study in which a web-based IS at a national telecommunications company in South Africa was evaluated using e-Service Quality (e-SQ) constructs. The study demonstrates the operationalisation of an e-SQ instrument for the purposes of evaluating IS effectiveness amongst multi-stakeholders. Evidence is provided that measuring attitudes of different stakeholders provides a more holistic perspective of IS success.

References

  1. Babbie, E. & Mouton, J. 2004. The practice of social research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Delone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. 1992. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3, 1, 60--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Delone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. 2002. Information systems success revisited. Proceeding of the 35th Hawaai international conference of system sciences. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Delone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. 2003. The Delone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4, 9--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Grover, G., Jeong, S. R. & Segars, A. H. 1996. Information systems effectiveness: the construct space and patterns of application. Information and Management, 31, 4, 177--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Grover, V., Purvis, R. & Coffey, J. (eds). 2004. Information systems effectiveness. http://business.clemson.edu/ISE/ {14 June 2004}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Molla, A. & Licker P. S. 2001. E-Commerce Systems Success: An Attempt to Extend and Respecify the Delone and McLean Model of IS Success. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2, 4, 131--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Myers, M. D. (ed). 1997. Qualitative research in information systems. http://www.qual.auckland.ac.nz {29 January 2005}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Leonard, L. L. 1988. SERVQUAL: a multi-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 1, 12--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Malhotra, A. 2005. E-S-QUAL: A Multi-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality. Journal of Service Research, 7, 3, 213--233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Pather, S., Erwin, G. & Remenyi, D. 2004. E-commerce success: the quest for IS effectiveness measurement: a conceptual framework for the e-commerce environment. South African Computer Journal, 32, 34--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Santos, J. 2003. E-service quality: a model of virtual service quality dimensions. Managing Service Quality, 13, 3, 233--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Saunders, M. N. K., & Williams, C. S. 2002. Towards an Informed Evaluation of Information Systems Services' Quality: The Development and Application of the Template Process. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 1, 1, 42--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Seddon, P. B., Staples, S., Patnayakuni R. & Bowtell, M. 1999. Dimensions of information systems success. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2, 3. http://cais.aisnet.org/articles/2-20/article.htm {23 June 2004}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Smithson, S. & Hirschheim, R. 1998. Analysing information system evaluation: another look at an old problem. European Journal of Information Systems, 7, 3, 158--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Van Riel, A. C. R, Liljander, V. & Jurriens, P. 2001. Exploring consumer evaluations of e-services: a portal site. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12, 4, 359--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Watson, R. T., Pitt, L. F., Cunningham, C. J. & Nel, D. 1993. User Satisfaction and service quality of the IS department: closing the gaps. Journal of Information Technology, 8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Watson, R. T., Pitt, L. F., & Kavan, C. B. 1998. Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Lessons form two longitudinal case studies. MIS Quarterly, 22, 1, 61--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Whyte, G., and Bytheway, A. 1996. Factors affecting information systems' success. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 7, 1, 74--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Whyte, G., Bytheway, A. & Edwards, C. 1997. Understanding user perceptions of information systems success. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 6, 35--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Yang, Z. 2001. Consumer perceptions of service quality in Internet-based electronic commerce. Proceeding of the 30th EMAC Conference: Bergen, 8--11 May.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research, design and methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Zeithaml, V. A. 2002. Service excellence in electronic channels. Managing Service Quality, 12, 3, 135--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Providing a holistic perspective to evaluating e-service quality in web-based systems: a multi-stakeholder approach

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SAICSIT '07: Proceedings of the 2007 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries
          October 2007
          211 pages
          ISBN:9781595937759
          DOI:10.1145/1292491

          Copyright © 2007 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 October 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate187of439submissions,43%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader